人工智能时代的刑法关切:自动驾驶汽车造成的犯罪及其认定
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D924.3

基金项目:

教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"刑法目的解释研究"(18YJC820057)


The attention of criminal law in the era of artificial intelligence: The crimes caused by self-driving automobiles and their judgment
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对自动驾驶汽车造成的犯罪,需要根据刑法作出具体的认定。如果自动驾驶汽车由于行驶造成他人伤亡、数额较大的财物毁坏,应先确定行为主体。辅助驾驶型自动驾驶汽车的行为主体是辅助驾驶人,完全自动型驾驶汽车的行为主体是汽车生产商。在认定辅助驾驶型自动驾驶汽车造成的犯罪时,根据辅助驾驶人所具备故意或过失的具体形式,其驾驶行为构成不同的犯罪。在认定完全自动型自动驾驶汽车造成的犯罪时,汽车生产商的行为只能构成过失致人死亡罪或过失致人重伤罪且只能是作为犯,定罪的核心在于汽车生厂商的注意义务和注意能力。

    Abstract:

    It should be concretely judged for the crimes caused by self-driving automobiles. If self-driving automobiles cause casualties and make properties with a relatively large amount be damaged, conduct subject should be defined. The conduct subject of self-driving automobiles of help-driving type is the help-driver. The conduct subject of self-driving automobiles of completely automatic type is the manufacturer of the automobile. When we judge the crimes caused by self-driving automobiles of help-driving type, the driving conducts of the help-drivers are different crimes in terms of the concrete forms of their intention and negligence. When we judge the crimes caused by self-driving automobiles of completely automatic type, the conducts of the manufacturer of the automobile are only crime of negligent homicide or crime of negligently causing serious injury and are only conduct crime. The core of judgment is the care duty and care ability of the manufacturer.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王德政.人工智能时代的刑法关切:自动驾驶汽车造成的犯罪及其认定[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(3):131-141. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. fx.2018.12.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-04
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-01
  • 出版日期: