人文社会科学研究过程中研究伦理的风险防控
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C1;B82-05

基金项目:

天津市科技发展战略研究计划项目"协同治理视域下我国科研伦理治理体系研究"(19ZLZXZF00220)


Study on preventing and controlling the ethic risk in the process of humanities and social sciences research
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于研究主导权与研究能力的缺乏,人文社会科学研究者往往面临着各种研究伦理风险。现有研究主要关注实证研究风险与结果呈现风险两个方面,忽视了作为"总开关"的研究问题风险与极具科学性的研究设计风险。文章应用文献荟萃分析法,基于过程视角将研究伦理风险细分为研究问题风险、研究设计风险、实证研究风险和结果公开风险,根据意识与行为、局部与整体的内在关联将其归因于研究者缺乏风险防控意识,受到学术利益驱使,缺乏风险防控技巧以及缺乏总体防控观念,进而提出一系列风险防控对策。

    Abstract:

    Due to the lack of research leadership and research capacity, the researchers in humanities and social sciences often face various research ethical risks. The existing researches mainly focus on two kinds of risks, that is, empirical research risks and results presentation risks, and ignore the risks of problems selecting as master switch and the risks of scientific research design. By literature meta-analysis, this study divides the ethic risk into problem risk, design risk, empirical research risk and result disclosure risk with a perspective of process. It is attributed to lack of awareness of risk prevention and control, driving by academic interests, lack of risk prevention and control skills, and lack of overall prevention and control concepts based on the internal relationship of consciousness and behavior as well as part and whole. And then, a series of risk prevention and control countermeasures are proposed.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

唐权.人文社会科学研究过程中研究伦理的风险防控[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(5):121-129. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2020.04.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-06
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-09-24
  • 出版日期: