高管薪酬激励与企业创新——基于中国上市公司的经验证据
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F272.92;F273.1

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目"经济发展新常态下中国金融开放、金融安全与全球金融风险研究"(17ZDA037);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"包容性金融发展对农村家庭创业的影响研究:基于放宽农村金融市场准入的视角"(18YJC790177);江苏省社会科学基金青年项目"江苏包容性金融发展对农村家庭企业家精神培育的影响研究"(18EYC008)


Executive compensation incentive and enterprise innovation:An empirical study based on Chinese listed companies
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    创新是经济增长的重要驱动力,在当前我国由"中国制造"迈向"中国智造"的关键阶段,企业要获取更多的利润,必须依靠创新来强化自身的核心竞争力。高管是企业的关键决策者,对企业创新活动具有重要影响。文章利用2010—2017年中国949家上市公司的面板数据,首先,分别采用面板固定效应模型和面板负二项回归模型实证检验了高管薪酬激励对企业研发投入和研发产出的影响,研究发现,高管薪酬激励的三种模式,即货币薪酬、股权和在职消费激励均显著促进了企业创新活动。其次,文章还探讨了高管薪酬激励对企业创新活动的异质性影响。一方面,根据企业所有权性质将样本企业划分为国有和非国有企业样本组,研究发现,与国有企业相比,高管薪酬激励显著促进了非国有企业的创新活动。另一方面,根据企业所属行业类别将样本企业划分为高新技术企业与非高新技术企业样本组,研究发现,股权激励模式显著提高了高新技术企业的研发投入和非高新技术企业的研发产出。为检验上述实证结果的可靠性,文章还采用更换企业研发投入和研发产出指标的衡量方法进行稳健性检验,结果显示,高管薪酬激励与企业研发创新的显著正相关关系依然稳健。高管自身风险厌恶程度和个人能力等因素不仅会影响高管薪酬水平,而且还会影响高管对企业创新的决策。文章以"2014年央企薪酬改革"这一政策事件为时间中点,构造准自然实验,采用双重差分模型实证检验2014年央企薪酬制度改革的外生政策冲击对企业创新的影响。结果显示,高管薪酬管制政策显著降低了国有企业的研发投入,但对其研发产出的影响并不显著。基于此,文章提出了以下政策建议:一是通过设计显性与隐性激励相结合的高管薪酬激励契约,并在对管理层的考核方案中适当引入非短期会计业绩指标来激发企业高管进行主动创新的积极性。二是通过"两权统一"、长期股权激励等方式完善国有企业高管薪酬激励机制从而鼓励企业的创新行为。三是可适度提高在职消费激励手段在高新技术企业中的应用,并辅以审计监督控制从而避免高管机会主义行为的发生。

    Abstract:

    Innovation is an important driving force for economic growth. At the critical stage of the transition from "Made in China" to "Intelligent Manufacturing in China", enterprises must rely on innovation to strengthen their core competitiveness in order to obtain more profits. Executives are the key decision makers of an enterprise and have an important influence on the innovation activities of the enterprise. The article uses the panel data of 949 listed companies in China from 2010 to 2017. First, the panel fixed effects model and the panel negative binomial regression model are used to empirically test the impact of executive compensation incentives on corporate R&D investment and R&D output. The results show that the three modes of executive compensation incentives, namely monetary compensation, equity and on-the-job consumption incentives, have significantly promoted corporate innovation activities. Secondly, this article also explores the heterogeneous impact of executive compensation incentives on corporate innovation activities. On the one hand, the sample enterprises are divided into subsample groups of state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises according to the nature of their ownership. We find that compared with state-owned enterprises, executive compensation incentives significantly promote the innovative activities of non-state-owned enterprises. On the other hand, the sample enterprises are divided into high-tech enterprises and non-high-tech enterprise subsample groups according to their industry categories. We find that the equity incentive model significantly increased the R&D investment of high-tech enterprises and the R&D output of non-high-tech enterprises. In order to test the reliability of the above empirical results, this paper also uses the measurement method of replacing the R&D investment and R&D output indicators of enterprises to conduct a robustness test. The results show that the significant positive correlation between executive compensation incentives and enterprise R&D innovation is still stable. Considering the factors such as the degree of risk aversion and personal ability of the executives will not only affect the level of executive compensation, but also affect the decision-making of the executives on corporate innovation. This paper takes the policy event of "2014 central enterprise compensation reform" as the midpoint of time, constructs a quasi-natural experiment, and uses a double difference model to empirically test the impact of the exogenous policy impact of the 2014 central enterprise compensation system reform on corporate innovation. The results show that the executive compensation control policy has significantly reduced the R&D investment of state-owned enterprises, but the impact on its R&D output is not significant. Therefore, this article puts forward the following policy recommendations:First, to stimulate the enthusiasm of enterprise executives for active innovation, we should design executive compensation incentive contracts that combine explicit and implicit incentives, and appropriately introduce non-short-term accounting performance indicators in the management evaluation plan. Second, to encourage innovative behaviors of enterprises, we should improve the compensation incentive mechanism for state-owned enterprise executives by means of "unification of the two powers" and long-term equity incentives. Third, the application of on-the-job consumption incentives in high-tech enterprises can be appropriately improved, supplemented by auditing supervision and control so as to avoid the occurrence of executive opportunistic behavior.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

翁辰,马良泽.高管薪酬激励与企业创新——基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(3):67-81. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. jg.2022.04.006

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-04
  • 出版日期: