The appearance of new characteristics of the social science of the humanities research confronts its academic evaluation mechanism with new challenges. The new characteristics include the blending and further subdivision of the disciplines as well as the abundant adoption of empirical research methodology. A consummate and scientific academic evaluation mechanism can improve the quality if the social science of the humanities research effectively while an unscientific and nonnormative academic evaluation mechanism will obstruct the development of the social science of the humanities research. In the process of academic evaluation, the citation, acceptation and feasibility of achievement transformation should become the main basis of the evaluation and the adoption of the “magnum opus” system will improve the quality if the social science of the humanities research effectively as well.