2025年7月16日 周三
Theoretical justification and legislative response of “Centre of Obligation” in environmental law
CSTR:
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [25]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Centre of Obligation Theory of environmental law is derived from the aspect of "Law Technology". It is different from "Obligation Standard Theory" which is derived from the aspect of "Law Value". "Centre of Obligation Theory" is neither ignorant of the subject's right nor regression to "Obligation Standard Theory". It is the most powerful protection and enforcement of environmental rights which means to improve the legal efficacy. The objective basis of "Centre of Obligation Theory" in environmental law is actually the objectivity of natural laws, the basal property of human's demand and specialty of environmental problem. In order to enhance the legal efficacy of environmental law by reforming the legislation of environmental law according to "Centre of Obligation Theory", China's environmental law need to reform legal theory and expand legislation path. The reform of legal theory has to be change from forcing by previous errors to precaution of predictable risks. The measures to expand legislation path on "Centre of Obligation Theory" in environmental law include appropriate allocation of each subject's environmental obligation, extension of active obligation contents, addition to fulfillment methods of environment obligation, and aggravation of legal results for violation of environment obligation.

    Reference
    [1] 徐祥民.告别传统,厚筑环境义务之堤[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(6):7-8.
    [2] 莫尔特曼.生态危机:自然界享有真正的和平吗?[M]//刘小枫.20世纪西方宗教哲学文选(下卷).上海:上海三联书店,1991:
    [3] 李爱年,彭本利.环境权应成为环境法体系的重心[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2004(4):78-83.
    [4] 徐祥民.环境权论——从人权发展的历史分期谈起[C]//中国环境资源法学研究会中国海洋大学法学院论文集.青岛:中国海洋大学出版社,2003.
    [5] 张恒山.义务先定论[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1999.
    [6] 周玉华,郭永长.环境法"义务重心论"[C]//环境法治与建设和谐社会——2007年全国环境资源法学年会论文集.2007:409-415.
    [7] 田其云,阳露昭.论节约能源法的义务本位[J].学术交流,2004(5):37-41.
    [8] 刘卫先.环境义务初探[J].兰州学刊,2009(2):198-202.
    [9] 王彬辉.论环境法的逻辑嬗变:从义务本位到权利本位[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:2-27.
    [10] 胡中华.论环境保护之为普遍义务[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2011:1-174.
    [11] 刘明明.从"保护"到"回馈"——论环境义务观的逻辑嬗变[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009(3):47-48.
    [12] 范正伟.论企业的环境法律义务——以"环境法律义务重心论"为基础[D].北京:北京大学,2003:1-43.
    [13] 田圣斌.环境法律义务重心论[DB/OL].[2012-1-02].http://www.btophr.com/s_mfile/6157.shtml.
    [14] 北岳."义务重心"与"权利本位"辨析[J].中外法学,1992(3):17-18.
    [15] 孙笑侠."权利本位说"的基点、方法与理念——兼评"法本位"论战三方观点与方法[J].中国法学,1991(4):49-50.
    [16] 吕忠梅.环境法学研究的转身——以环境与健康法律问题调查为例[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):23-29.
    [17] 莱恩·多亚尔,伊恩·高夫.人的基本需要[M].汪淳波,张宝莹,译.北京:商务印书馆,2008:45.
    [18] 池田大作,奥锐里欧·贝恰.二十一世纪的警钟[M].卞立强,译.北京:中国国际广播出版社,1988.
    [19] 徐祥民.被决定的法理——法学理论在生态文明中的革命[J].法学论坛,2007(1):30-31.
    [20] 蔡守秋.论政府环境责任的缺陷与健全[J].河北法学,2008(3):17-25.
    [21] 焦君红.人对自然的权利与义务问题研究[D].石家庄:河北经贸大学;2008:5
    [22] 徐祥民.关于修改环境法的八大看法——人与自然和谐的视角[M]//环境资源法论丛(第3卷).北京:人民出版社, 2007年.
    [23] 郭永长.论公司环境义务[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2007:17.
    [24] 秦鹏.消费者环境义务的法律确立[J].法学论坛,2010(1):76-82.
    [25] 刘耀辉,龚向和.环境法调整机制变革中之政府环境义务嬗变[J].法学杂志,2011(5):112-114.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

唐绍均,蒋云飞.环境法“义务重心”的理论证成与立法回应[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(2):139~145

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1757
  • PDF: 1201
  • HTML: 548
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:November 20,2015
  • Online: April 07,2016
Article QR Code