2025年4月25日 周五
On features and distribution of the power of procuratorate to bring public interest litigation
CSTR:
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [26]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The core issue on public interest litigation instituted by procuratorate is a constitutional problem about the features and distribution of procuratorial power. Based on procuratorial power's position in Constitution of the People's Republic of China and process of development and transformation for procuratorial supervision system in China, the features of procuratorial power to bring public interest litigation is neither an excessively broad interpretation of legal supervision power nor an extension of litigation supervision power, but the exercise of procuratorate's general supervision power. The reform and innovation of procuratorial supervision creates a new opportunity for resurrecting and updating general procuratorate's supervision power. Featured as general supervision power, procuratorial power to bring public interest litigation can be distributed more appropriately. Because of this, system design in supervision way, supervision process and supervision content will be more proper.

    Reference
    [1] 吕忠梅.吕忠梅:八问检察院试点环境公益诉讼[DB/OL].[2015-11-01].http://www.h2o-china.com/news/227101.html.
    [2] 王蓉,陈世寅.关于检察机关不应作为环境民事公益诉讼原告的法理分析[J].法学杂志,2010(6):68-70.
    [3] 熊明.检察机关不宜成为民事公益诉讼的主体——以新修订的民事诉讼法为视角[J].辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报,2013(2):63-65.
    [4] 王琦,崔声波.检察机关民事公益起诉权探究[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009(3)283-290.
    [5] 廖中洪.我国民诉法基本原则规定的问题及其重构设想(上)[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2002(5):53-58.
    [6] 晁岳强.人民检察院在刑事附带民事诉讼中的法律地位问题[J].山东审判,2013(5):45-46.
    [7] 徐运平.民事公诉亟待立法[N].人民日报, 2003-01-22(13).
    [8] 何燕.检察机关提起民事公益诉讼之权力解析及程序构建[J].法学论坛,2012(4):130-137.
    [9] 田成有,李来孺.重构还是超越: 法律解释的客观性探询——以德沃金和波斯纳的法律解释论为主[J].法制与社会发展,2003(1):57-63.
    [10] 姜伟.公诉制度的历史沿革和发展趋势[J].浙江社会科学,2002(4):72-80.
    [11] 郑贤君.论检察权与行政权的关系[J].河南社会科学,2011(6):10-14.
    [12] 傅郁林.我国民事检察权的权能与程序配置[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2012 (6):176-185.
    [13] 雷小政.往返流盼:检察机关一般监督权的考证与展望[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2012(2):75-82.
    [14] 李红燕.探析公益诉讼[J].理论界,2005(2):90-91.
    [15] 江伟,邵明,陈刚,等.民事诉权研究[M].法律出版社,2002:9-13.
    [16] 单锋.公益诉权论[J].河北法学,2007(3):141-145.
    [17] 甘雷,谢志强.检察机关"一般监督权"的反思与重构[J].河北法学,2010(4):190-195.
    [18] 刘松山.彭真与1979年人民检察院组织法的制定[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2015(1):47-57.
    [19] 徐益初.实践中探索中国特色的检察制度[J].国家检察官学院学报,2005(1):154-158.
    [20] 周叶中,叶正国.我国宪法检察制度若干关键问题辨析[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015(2):49-61.
    [21] 夏邦.关于检察院体制存废的讨论 [J].法学,1999(7):47-48.
    [22] 韩成军.人民代表大会制度下检察机关一般监督权的配置[J].当代法学,2012(6):31-37.
    [23] 韩大元,刘松山.论我国检察机关的宪法地位[J].中国人民大学学报,2002(5):69-77.
    [24] 郑贤君.论检察权与行政权的关系[J].河南社会科学,2011(6):10-14.
    [25] 谭炜杰.行政合理性原则审查强度之类型化——基于行政诉讼典型案例的解析与整合[J].法律适用,2014(12):49-54.
    [26] 张守增.论行政诉讼合理性审查的引入及标准[N].法制日报,2008-05-11(12).
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

李爱年,刘爱良.论检察机关提起公益诉讼的权力属性及职权配置[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(3):142~150

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1057
  • PDF: 926
  • HTML: 691
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:March 17,2016
  • Online: June 17,2016
Article QR Code