In this paper, the 40 kinds of social science journals, which are included in "Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Science Evaluation Report 2014", are studied. Combined with one hand survey data and some public data, this paper establishes the evaluation index system of the comprehensive influence of academic journals to analyze and evaluate the comprehensive influence of the authority academic journals. The research finds that the ratio of funded papers, online download rates, overseas papers, the composite total citation, the reprint rate of the three main abstracts, and the rate of reprint and copy of information center for social sciences of Renmin University of China, have a positive correlation with the composite impact factor of the authoritative journals. The higher the digital level of journals, the higher the composite impact factor, but authority journals have a relatively low proportion of micro blog and micro channel platforms, and only a few of them are published in priority. Authoritative journals are mostly cited by other publications. The composite impact factor of authoritative journals are closely related to the influence of journals, the popular degree of the subject, the setting of columns and the quality of the articles. There are always differences of impact factor between the different disciplines journals. Finally, according to the conclusion, the relevant policy suggestions are put forward to improve the comprehensive influence of academic journals.