New perceptions of the sins of aggregated consequential offense
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Traditional theory of aggravated consequential offense emphasizes the decision of aggravated result of crime, blurs the subjective aspect of the crime to the aggravated consequential offense, splits the behavior of the subjective aspect and objective aspect, distorts the concept of behavior, and falls in judgment errors. Therefore, we need to ensure fault principle, correct prejudices in the traditional culpability theory that judges the crime purely due to actor's subjective state of mind, affirm the core role of subjective fault in the identification of crime, and investigate the development process and its realization degree of behavior cause and effect from the subjective fault. At the same time, we need to clearly define the control connotation of behavior concept, reveal the essence of the crime origination and protect the opposite will interests in the criminal law, then grasp aggregated consequential offense from the sins of feason.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

童春荣.结果加重犯之罪过新论[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(4):158~166

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:June 18,2015
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: July 18,2016
  • Published: