2025年7月23日 周三
Local government competition, FDI and welfare gap between urban and rural residents
CSTR:
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [25]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Under the background of attracting investment among local governments, it has important influence for the uneven distribution of FDI on economic welfare between urban and rural residents. Based on the data of Chinese cities, this paper has an empirical analysis on the relationship between FDI and economic welfare of urban and rural residents under the background of competition of attracting investment among local governments from two aspects of the municipal district and the outskirts of city. The results are as following: in the municipal district, FDI has positive effect on economic welfare of residents, and preferential policies are indirectly good for improving economic welfare of residents. In the outskirts of city, FDI has not significantly positive effect on economic welfare of residents, and preferential policies don't have positive impact on it. At the same time, under the concept of economic development of "heavy city, light country" among local governments, residents in the outskirts of city have assessed the cost of urban economic development and share weakened welfare level of them.

    Reference
    [1] BLOMSTRÖM M, LIPSCY R, ZEJAN M. What explains the growth in developing countries[R].NBER Discussion Paper, No. 1924, 1994.
    [2] BORENSZTEIN E, DE GREGORIO J, LEE J W. How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1998, 45 (1): 115-135.
    [3] REIS A B. On the welfare effect of foreign investment[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2001, 54 (2): 411-428.
    [4] MARKUSON J R, MASKUS K E. Multinational forms:Reconciling theory and evidence[R]. NBER Working Paper, No. 7163, 1999.
    [5] MORAN T H.Foreign direct investment and the development of low-income poorly performing states[M]. Washington: Center for Global Development, 2005.
    [6] SARBAJIT C, DIBYENDU B. FDI in agricultural land, welfare and unemployment in a developing economy[J]. Research in Economics, 2010,25: 229-239.
    [7] 潘文卿. 外商投资对中国工业部门的外溢效应:基于面板数据的分析[J].世界经济,2003(6):3-7.
    [8] 于津平. 外资政策、国民利益与经济发展[J]. 经济研究, 2004 (5): 49-57.
    [9] 应千伟,杨全发.吸引FDI对东道国福利的影响[J].世界经济文汇,2004(5):36-46.
    [10] 周泳宏.漏损、FDI外溢效应弹性和东道国福利[J]. 世界经济研究, 2008,(6):63-68,88.
    [11] 张广胜,周娟.FDI对城乡收入不均等影响的实证研究——基于省际面板数据的GMM分析[J].财经科学, 2009(2):88-91.
    [12] 颜冬.城乡统筹发展背景下FDI与城乡收入差距间关系的实证研究[J].技术经济,2015,34(3):58-62,96.
    [13] 阚大学.外商直接投资、对外贸易与经济福利关系的实证研究——基于省级动态面板数据[J].石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,24(2):56-59.
    [14] 郑少华, 罗丽英.国际直接投资对我国福利水平影响实证研究[J].湖南社会科学, 2013 (3):148-151.
    [15] 魏后凯.外商直接投资对中国区域经济增长的影响[J].经济研究,2002(4):19-26.
    [16] 陶然, 刘明兴.中国城乡收入差距,地方政府开支及财政自主[J].世界经济文汇, 2007(2): 1-21.
    [17] CHOI C.Foreign direct investment and income convergence[J].Applied Economics,2004, 36 (10):1045-1049.
    [18] SEN A.Real national income[J]. Review of Economic Studies,1976,43:19-39.
    [19] 莫亚琳,张志超.城市化进程、公共财政支出与社会收入分配——基于城乡二元结构模型与面板数据计量的分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2011 (3): 79-89.
    [20] UNCTAD. World Investment Report[R]. United Nations: New York, 2012.
    [21] DÉMURGER S, SACHS J D, WOO W T, et al. Geography, economic policy, and regional development in China[J]. Asian Economic Papers, 2002, 1 (1): 146-197.
    [22] 陈刚. FDI竞争、环境规制与污染避难所——对中国式分权的反思[J].世界经济研究,2009,(6): 3-7,43,87.
    [23] 赵奇伟.东道国制度安排、市场分割与FDI溢出效应:来自中国的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2009, 8(3): 891-924.
    [24] 魏玮,宋一弘,刘志红.能源约束、环境规制对FDI流动的经济效应分析[J].审计与经济经济研究,2013(2):106-112.
    [25] 曾国平,彭艳,曹跃群.产业结构调整与全要素生产率增长实证分析[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2015,21(6):77-85.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

王庆华,王瑞君.地方政府竞争、外商直接投资与城乡居民福利差异[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(5):10~20

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:June 16,2016
  • Online: October 14,2016
Article QR Code