2025年4月28日 周一
Petroleum pollution prevention by law & economics analysis:Based on property rule, liability rule and inalienable rule
CSTR:
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [20]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In variety of remedies for ecological damage which had caused by oil pollution, they can be found corresponding rule model in field of law and economics. Once oil contamination causes ecological damage, analyzing the efficiency of remedial rules has two advantages. On the one hand, it might be contribute to revise the costs & benefits and practical effect of the remedies which are being used to solve oil spill incidents such as the one happened in Bohai. On the other hand, it can provide theoretical basis for further choice when we choose different rules. Liability rule has three superiorities such as ex post relief, guardianship environmental public interest and executive power restriction when it is compared with other remedial rules. At this point, liability rule should come the main regulation for oil spill contamination. However, every relief measure has potential social cost. Therefore, liability rule should be coordinate with other regulations and reduce its valuation cost, then a high quality remedial plan with lower cost and massive benefits would be provided.

    Reference
    [1] 帕特森.布莱克维尔哲学和法律理论指南[M].汪庆华,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2013:315.
    [2] WITTMAN D A.Economic analysis of law[M].Blackwell Publishing,2003:22-23.
    [3] 竺效.生态损害填补责任归责原则的两分法及其配套措施[J].政治与法律,2007(3):89-94.
    [4] 董正爱,王璐璐.迈向回应型环境风险法律规制的变革路径——环境治理多元规范体系的法治重构[J].社会科学研究,2015(4):95-101.
    [5] 孟甜.环境纠纷解决机制的理论分析与实践检视[J].法学评论,2015(2):171-180.
    [6] KRIER J, SCHWAB S.Property rules and liability rules:The cathedral in another light[C].70 New York University Law Review,1995:440.
    [7] 周林彬.物权法新论:一种法律经济分析的观点[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002:268.
    [8] 清华大学环境资源与能源法研究中心课题组.中国能源法(草案)专家建议稿与说明[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008:10.
    [9] 杜辉.环境司法的公共治理面向——基于"环境司法中国模式"的建构[J].法学评论,2015(4):168-176.
    [10] 沈海平.寻求有效率的惩罚:对犯罪刑罚问题的经济分析[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2009:5.
    [11] 陈德敏,鄢德奎.我国"按日计罚"制度裁处程序的规范路径[J].生态经济,2016(2):202-207.
    [12] 蓬莱19-3油田溢油事故联合调查组关于事故调查处理报告[EB/OL].[2012-06-21]. http://native.cnr.cn/news/201206/t20120621_509989271_4.html.
    [13] 代霞.中国能源消费总量:时序演变、影响因素与管控路径[J].求索,2015(1):111-115.
    [14] 秦鹏.关于环境公益诉讼制度实施的若干思考——基于国内首例跨省界环境公益诉讼案的分析[J].环境保护,2015(13):44-47.
    [15] 赵微,王慧.船舶溢油污染海洋的法律问责制研究[J].比较法研究,2012(6):122-133.
    [16] 罗南·佩里.深水地平线钻井平台溢油污染及其民事责任限制[C].乔治·华盛顿大学法律评论(第86卷),2011.
    [17] 刘天齐.环境保护通论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997:82.
    [18] 李伟芳.论我国海洋石油污染中环境损害的范围认定[J].政治与法律,2010(12):117-123.
    [19] 邓海峰.海洋环境容量的物权化及其权利构成[J].政法论坛,2013(2):131-137.
    [20] 郭楠.能源体制改革下油气对外合作开采的规制失灵与规范路径——以《对外合作开采海洋(陆上)石油资源条例》为研究[J].国际经贸探索,2016(3):103-112.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

秦鹏,郭楠.油污损害防治的法经济学解释——基于财产规则、责任规则和不可让渡规则三个维度的分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2016,22(6):162~167

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1177
  • PDF: 959
  • HTML: 1145
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 04,2016
  • Online: January 04,2017
Article QR Code