The new draft revision of China Patent Law has published officially in December,2015.Article 63 of this draft,particularly its Section 1&2,caused extensive concerns.It seems that the problem of whether ISPs have the patent examination obligation has solved,which represents a great progress in the development process of Patent Law.Regrettably,Article 63 imitated Article 36 of the Tort Liability Law directly,making it unable to adjust to the special condition of patent protecting completely.There are still plenty of details need to be fixed.In this article,what the "internet service provider" exactly means,what the limitations of "patent examination obligation" are,and how the "notice-takedown" rule works,are all associated to whether and how ISPs take legal responsibilities,and all these issues need to be considered carefully.