2025年4月25日 周五
Definition of tort liability in the third party governance of environmental pollution
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D922.68;D923.7

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [22]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The definition of tort liability in third-party environmental pollution control cannot rely on the form division of entrusted management code, custody operation mode, centralized management mode and decentralized governance mode. It should be carried out from the clear relationship between the polluting and pollution control enterprises. According to the pollution control facilities provided by the polluting or pollution control enterprises, the basic relationship between the polluting and pollution control enterprises in third-party environmental pollution control may be the legal relationship of environmental service contracts or work contracts; in addition, the basic relationship between the two may also be an invalid contractual relationship. Under the legal relationship of environmental service contract, the pollution control enterprises should assume joint and several liability with the polluting enterprises if there is any fault in the former. Under work contract, the pollution control enterprises shall bear tort liability if there is no ordering, directing or choosing negligence in the polluting enterprises. Under invalid contract, common infringement, common dangerous behavior, separate infringement with cumulative causality and separate infringement with joint causality should be distinguished, for the polluting and pollution control enterprises to assume joint, or shared, or partly joint and partly shared tort liability. The ultimate liability between the polluting and pollution control enterprises shall be allocated according to the appointed or legal proportion.

    Reference
    [1] 王琪,韩坤.环境污染第三方治理中政企关系的协调[J].中州学刊,2015(6):72-77.
    [2] 董战峰;董玮;田淑英,等.我国环境污染第三方治理机制改革路线图[J].中国环境管理,2016(4):52-59.
    [3] 范战平.论我国环境污染第三方治理机制构建的困境及对策[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(2):41-44.
    [4] 刘畅.环境污染第三方治理的现实障碍及其化解机制探析[J].河北法学,2016(3):164-171.
    [5] 骆建华.环境污染第三方治理的发展及完善建议[J].环境保护,2014(20):15-19.
    [6] 马云.水污染第三方治理机制中第三方的刑事责任[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2015(2):31-34.
    [7] 刘宁,吴卫星."企企合作"模式下环境污染第三方治理民事侵权责任探究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(3):61-68.
    [8] 邓可祝.排污企业与第三方的责任分配[J].山东工商学院学报,2016(3):110-117.
    [9] 常杪,杨亮,王世汶.环境污染第三方治理的应用与面临的挑战[J].环境保护,2014(20):20-22.
    [10] 任卓冉.环境污染第三方治理的困境及法制完善[J].中州学刊,2016(12):49-54.
    [11] 周江洪.服务合同在我国民法典中的定位及其制度构建[J].法学,2008(1):76-83.
    [12] 张宇庆.环境服务合同的概念演进与类型分化[J].河北法学,2013(10):79-86.
    [13] 杨立新.网络交易法律关系构造[J].中国社会科学,2016(2):114-137.
    [14] 王利明,房绍坤,王轶.合同法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:360.
    [15] 崔建远.合同法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:486.
    [16] 杨立新.工伤事故的责任认定和法律适用(上)[J].法律适用,2003(10):8-12.
    [17] 杨立新.法院审理侵权案件观点集成[M].北京:中国法治出版社,2016:246.
    [18] 王利明.侵权责任法研究(下)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
    [19] 张新宝.侵权责任法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.
    [20] 王竹.论数人侵权责任分担中最终责任份额的确定方式[J].法商研究,2010(6):19-22.
    [21] 杨立新.侵权责任法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2010.
    [22] 王利明.论共同危险行为中的加害人不明[J].政治与法律,2010(4):76-83.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

唐绍均,魏雨.环境污染第三方治理的侵权责任界定[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2019,25(1):141~151

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:947
  • PDF: 1439
  • HTML: 895
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Revised:September 16,2018
  • Online: January 08,2019
Article QR Code