2025年4月2日 周三
On the “foreign villager” buyers of homestead and houses with limited property rights: A perspective of household division tradition
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D923.2;F321.1

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [35]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Household division tradition and practice have created a steady demand for spare homestead, which is the root of the surplus homestead of Chinese peasants. "One household one homestead" rule is necessary in the constraint of limited land, but this rule is not in line with the actual situation of rural area, and household division tradition and practice make this rule hard to follow. Buyers of homestead and houses with limited property rights from the outside of the rural collective economic organizations are called "foreign villagers", which implies that their rights and obligations are absent in the collective economic organizations. In the perspective of the members of the collective economic organizations, "foreign villagers" don't participate in various daily activities and major affairs in the community of the certain villagers and fail to comply with relevant obligations, which makes them not a real member of the village and excluded from the right of getting the very same compensation as the villagers of collective economic organization in the expropriation, and buyers of homestead and houses with limited property rights agree to compensate the sellers even when they has already signed a contract if the expropriation happens.

    Reference
    [1] 高海.农村宅基地上房屋买卖司法实证研究[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,35(4):180-189.
    [2] 西敏司.甜与权力:糖在近代历史上的地位[M].王超,朱健刚,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
    [3] 杜希德.唐代财政[M]丁俊,译.上海:中西书局,2016:26.
    [4] 黄仁宇.十六世纪明代中国的财政与税收[M].阿凤,许文继,倪玉平,等,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2007:41.
    [5] 马克斯·韦伯.中国的宗教:儒教与道教[M].康乐,简惠美,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2010.
    [6] 萧公权.中国乡村:论十九世纪的帝国控制[M].张皓,张升,译,台北:联经出版事业股份有限公司,2014.
    [7] 瞿同祖.中国法律与中国社会[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010.
    [8] 费孝通.江村经济[M].戴可景,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
    [9] 沈艾娣.梦醒子:一位华北乡居者的人生[M].赵妍杰,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2013:137-138.
    [10] 俞江.民事习惯对民法典的意义:以分家析产习惯为线索[C]//易继明.私法(第5辑第1卷).北京:北京大学出版社,2005:44.
    [11] 房绍坤.关于修订继承法的三点建议[J].法学论坛,2013,28(2):46-51.
    [12] 龚为纲.农村分家类型与三代直系家庭的变动趋势:基于对全国人口普查数据的分析[J].南方人口,2013,28(1):61-72.
    [13] 印子.分家、代际互动与农村家庭再生产:以鲁西北农村为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(4):21-29, 155.
    [14] 杨龙.独子家庭的财产继承:清代至今家产制的形态及其变迁[C]//苏力.法律和社会科学(第11卷).北京:法律出版社,2013:1-68.
    [15] 王跃生.婚事操办中的代际关系:家庭财产积累与转移:冀东农村的考察[J].中国农村观察,2010(3):60-72.
    [16] 张杨波.无法维权的社会抗争何以可能?:以武汉市东湖村小产权房拆迁补偿纠纷为例[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,44(5):13-22.
    [17] 张杨波.产权界定、拆迁补偿与群体分化研究:一个来自对两个村庄的经验观察[J].山东社会科学,2017(3):49-55.
    [18] 加里·贝克尔.人类行为的经济分析[M].王业宇,陈琪,译.上海:格致出版社,2008:21-36.
    [19] 马克斯·韦伯.学术与政治[M].冯克利,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2013:119.
    [20] 陈忠实.白鹿原[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1993.
    [21] 苏力.齐家:男女有别[J].政法论坛,2016,34(4):3-16.
    [22] 艾约博.以竹为生:一个四川手工造纸村的20世纪社会史[M].韩巍,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2016:44-46.
    [23] 阮智富,郭忠新.现代汉语大词典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2009:1038.
    [24] 王雨磊,王宁.人情债与人情味:农村宴席中的关系再生产[J].中州学刊,2012(4):107-111.
    [25] 马克斯·韦伯.宗教社会学[M].康乐,简惠美,译.林:广西师范大学出版社,2011:52.
    [26] 马克斯·韦伯.支配社会学[M].康乐,简惠美,译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2011:129.
    [27] 杜赞奇.文化、权力与国家:1900—1942年的华北农村[M].王福明,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2010:177.
    [28] 苏力.纲常、礼仪、称呼与秩序建构:追求对儒家的制度性理解[J].中国法学,2007(5):39-51.
    [29] 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室.中华人民共和国物权法条文说明、立法理由及相关规定[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007:279.
    [30] "农地入市"义乌试点:用宅基地贷款[N].南方周末,2017-09-14(B13).
    [31] 苏力.公民权利论的迷思:历史中国的国人、村民和分配正义[J].环球法律评论, 2017,39(5):5-26.
    [32] 苏力.中国司法中的政党[M]//法律和社会科学(第1卷).北京:法律出版社,2006:273.
    [33] 孔飞力.中国现代国家的起源[M].陈兼,陈之宏,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2013:101.
    [34] 詹姆斯.C.斯科特.弱者的武器[M].郑广怀,张敏,何江穗,译.上海:译林出版社,2011:2.
    [35] 韩文龙,谢璐.宅基地"三权分置"的权能困境与实现[J].农业经济问题,2018,39(5):60-69.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

米传振.论宅基地转让和小产权房买卖中的“外来户”——基于分家传统的视角[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2020,26(4):206~215

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:709
  • PDF: 1411
  • HTML: 1113
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 10,2020
  • Online: August 17,2020
Article QR Code