2025年3月30日 周日
Illumination of national governance in the new era:In the perspective of discourse
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D630;D922.182

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [35]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In the perspective of discourse theory, the connotation of state governance in the new era should be based on the value core of people's work led by the Communist Party of China. Rising from the file Investigation of Xing Guo in the period of revolutionary power building, the value is laid foundation during times of establishment of the PRC, which was described in the article of People's Letters Must Be Taken Seriously of. After the reform and opening up, people's work was seen in the progress of rule of law, as Regulation of Visit and Letters was revised in 2005. The discourse has been totally founded after the fourth plenary session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, with the recognition of context and value of taking people as the basis. Therefore, the whole discourse can only be developed in balance of three paths, which are total system and fragment technology, tradition of mobilization and value of stability in reform, static policy and unknown risk, and those three paths can only be fixed by law, fairness and collaborative governance.

    Reference
    [1] 徐亚清.论新时代中国特色社会主义国家治理的话语建构[J].云南社会科学,2018(2):39-46,186.
    [2] 中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定(辅导读本)[M].北京:人民出版社,2019.
    [3] 亓光,徐金梅.新时代中国国家治理现代化的整体性探析:基于"关系性论题"的视角[J].探索,2019(2):58-66,193.
    [4] 彼得·埃文斯,迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,西达·斯考切波.找回国家[M].方力维,等译.上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008:3.
    [5] GUENTHER R, WITTICH C.Economy and society[M].New York:Bedminster Press,1968:9.
    [6] 理查德·拉克曼.国家与权力[M].郦菁,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2013.
    [7] 迈克尔·曼.社会权力的来源(第四卷下)[M]. 郭忠华,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015:505-541.
    [8] 查尔斯·蒂利.强制、资本和欧洲国家(公元990-1992年)[M].魏洪钟,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2012:81-83.
    [9] SNYDER J.Political order and political decay:From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy[J].Ethics & International Affairs, 2015,29(2):233-236.
    [10] 尤尔根·哈贝马斯.重建历史唯物主义[M].郭文仪,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013:250-254.
    [11] 米歇尔·福柯.词与物[M].莫伟民,译.上海:三联书店,2001:118.
    [12] 米歇尔·福柯.说真话的勇气:治理自我与治理他者[M].钱翰,译.上海:人民出版社,2016:23.
    [13] 马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 1995:81.
    [14] 李昕桐.马克思的现实观对我国国家治理的启示[J].求是学刊,2018(6):1-6.
    [15] 范逢春.国家治理现代化场域中的社会治理话语体系重构:基于话语分析的基本框架[J].行政论坛,2018(6):109-115.
    [16] 王浦劬,汤彬.论国家治理能力生产机制的三重维度[J].学术月刊,2019(4):65-72,120.
    [17] 孟庆延.历史社会学视野下毛泽东农村调查的多重意涵[J].中共党史研究,2018(11):127-128.
    [18] 中国人民解放军政治学院党史调研室.中共党史参考资料(第五册)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
    [19] 孟庆延.理念、策略与实践:毛泽东早期农村调查的历史社会学考察[J].社会学研究,2018(4):1-27,242.
    [20] 中国人民解放军政治学院党史调研室.中共党史参考资料(第六册)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979:611-612.
    [21] 毛泽东选集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:789-790.
    [22] 费正清.剑桥中华民国史(下)[M].刘敬坤,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1994:221.
    [23] 毛泽东文集(第六卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1999:164.
    [24] 中央人民政府法制委员会.中央人民政府法令汇编(1951年)[M].北京:法律出版社,1982.
    [25] 刁杰成.人民信访史略[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1996:23.
    [26] 谢岳.国家治理的法治逻辑[J].天津社会科学,2018(1):84-88.
    [27] 信访条例注解与配套[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2013.
    [28] 张海波.大数据与信访治理[J].社会科学文摘,2017(11):68-70.
    [29] 人民日报.第五次全国信访工作会议举行[EB/OL].(2001-09-30)[2020-01-03]. http://www.people.com.cn/GB/shizheng/16/20010930/573433.html.
    [30] 党的十九大报告(辅导读本)[M].北京:人民出版社,2017.
    [31] 第44次中国互联网发展状况统计报告[R].中国互联网信息中心,2019:1.
    [32] 冯仕政,朱展仪.当代中国阶级阶层政策的转变与社会治理[J].江苏行政学院学报,2018(3):74-79.
    [33] 徐亚清,于水,姜凯宜.新时代网络治理的历史缘起与话语转向[J].中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报,2019(2):110-118.
    [34] 杨立华.建设强政府与强社会组成的强国家:国家治理现代化的必然目标[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(6):57-62,188.
    [35] 乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译.南京:译林出版社,2004:1-2.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

徐亚清,于水.新时代国家治理的内涵阐释——基于话语理论分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(1):215~226

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:581
  • PDF: 1189
  • HTML: 1274
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Revised:January 16,2020
  • Online: February 01,2021
Article QR Code