2025年4月5日 周六
The criminal protection about biological identification information: Current situation and perfection ways——Taking the case of “face identification” in Sichuan as starting point
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D294.34

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [44]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Currently the application of biological identification information in our society shows a more and more increasing tendency. Biological identification information has its own particularity and social particularity, which decides that it has an importance which is different from common personal information of citizens, so it deserves to be specially protected by criminal law. However, there is not any form of special protection about biological identification information in current criminal law of China. Substantial interpretation method could be used to sufficiently take advantage of the two miscellaneous provisions of paragraph 1, item 10 and paragraph 2, item 4 in Article 5 of "Interpretation" of Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate under the premise of obeying principle of legality. We could consider "violating 5 or more pieces of biological identification information" as "gravity of the circumstances", and consider "violating 50 or more pieces of biological identification information" as "especially serious circumstances". By this way could the original quantities of conviction and promotion of legal penalty about biological identification information decrease. Finally, the special protection of biological identification information could be achieved.

    Reference
    [1] 刘春泉.换脸软件涉嫌公众安全人体生物识别信息管理要跟上[N].第一财经日报,2019-09-24(A11).
    [2] 王丽.生物识别信息滥用催生灰色产业[J].方圆,2019(24):18-23.
    [3] 付微明.大数据时代个人生物识别信息法律保护的重要意义[J].研究生法学,2019(4):134-140.
    [4] 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会刑法室.中华人民共和国刑法条文说明、立法理由及相关规定[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009:515.
    [5] ZIESCHANG F.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil[M].Berlin:Richard Boorberg Verlag,2017:24.
    [6] 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会刑法室.中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)条文说明、立法理由及相关规定[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2016:127.
    [7] 魏东.刑法各论[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:152.
    [8] 魏东.刑法:原理·图解·案例·司考[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社,2016:534.
    [9] 张明楷.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2016:921.
    [10] 王震.刑法的宣示性:犯罪黑数给我们带来的思考[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(5):34-43.
    [11] SCHÖNKE A, SCHRÖDER H.Strafgesetzbuch kommentar[M].Berlin:C.H. BECK, 2014:2485.
    [12] 山口厚.刑法各论[M].王昭武,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:248.
    [13] 陈璇.论侵占罪处罚漏洞之填补[J].法商研究,2015(1):136-146.
    [14] KUNDLICH H.Strafrecht besonderer teilⅡ:Delikte gegen die person und die allgemeinheit[M].Berlin:C. H.Beck,2009:51.
    [15] 鲁道夫·冯·耶琳.为权利而斗争[M].郑永流,译.北京:法律出版社,2007:9.
    [16] 黎宏.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2012:688.
    [17] 林钰雄.刑事法理论与实践[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:309.
    [18] 宋子晴.生物识别信息安全新主张[J].中国公共安全(综合版),2006(10):84-87.
    [19] 赵军.侵犯公民个人信息犯罪法益研究:兼析《刑法修正案(七)》的相关争议问题[J].江西财经大学学报,2011(2):108-113.
    [20] 王肃之.被害人教义学核心原则的发展:基于侵犯公民个人信息罪法益的反思[J].政治与法律,2017(10):27-38.
    [21] 江海洋.侵犯公民个人信息罪超个人法益之提倡[J].交大法学,2018(3):139-155.
    [22] 凌萍萍,焦冶.侵犯公民个人信息罪的刑法法益重析[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(6):66-71.
    [23] 王昭武,肖凯.侵犯公民个人信息犯罪认定中的若干问题[J].法学,2009(12):146-155.
    [24] 高富平,王文祥.出售或提供公民个人信息入罪的边界:以侵犯公民个人信息罪所保护的法益为视角[J].政治与法律,2017(2):46-55.
    [25] 冀洋.法益自决权与侵犯公民个人信息罪的司法边界[J].中国法学,2019(4):66-83.
    [26] 刘艳红.民法编纂背景下侵犯公民个人信息罪的保护法益:信息自决权——以刑民一体化及《民法总则》第111条为视角[J].浙江工商大学学报,2019(6):20-32.
    [27] 敬力嘉.大数据环境下侵犯公民个人信息罪法益的应然转向[J].法学评论:2018(2):116-127.
    [28] KINDHÄUSER U.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil[M].Berlin:Nomos,2015:43.
    [29] FREUND G,ROSTALSKI F.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil[M].Berlin Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2019.
    [30] 赵淑钰.生物识别信息法律规制的国际经验与启示[J].中国信息安全,2019(11):37-39,43.
    [31] 马斯蒙.美国个人生物识别信息法律保护路径探析[J].法制博览,2019(4):258.
    [32] 付微明.个人生物识别信息的法律保护模式与中国选择[J].华东政法大学学报,2019(6):78-88.
    [33] 董悦.公民个人信息分类保护的刑法模式构建[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020(2):80-89.
    [34] 陈兴良.规范刑法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013:196.
    [35] FRISTER H.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil[M].Berlin:C. H.Beck,2015:91.
    [36] FRISTER H.Vorsatzdogmatik in deutschland[J].Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik,2018, 7:381-386.
    [37] STRATENWERTH G,KUHLEN L.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil[M].Berlin:Vahlen,2011:46.
    [38] MAURACH R,ZIPF H.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil 1 grund lehren des strafrechts und aufbau der straftat[M].Berlin:C.F.Müller,1992:116.
    [39] HOFFMANN-HOLLLAND K.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil[M].Berlin:Mohr Siebeck,2015:9.
    [40] 刘沐阳.兜底条款的局限性及其实践运用[J].人民检察,2014(8):58-60.
    [41] JESCHECK H,WEIGEND T,STRAFRECHTS L,et al[M].Berlin:Duncker & Humblot,1996:53.
    [42] SCHMIDHAUSER E.Strafrecht allgemeiner teil lehrbuch[M].Berlin:J.C.B Mohr(Paul Siebeck) Tübingen,1970:110.
    [43] EUROPEAN UNION.General Data Protection Regulation[EB/OL].(2018-05-25)[2020-2-12].http://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.119.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2016:119:TOC.
    [44] 全国信息安全标准化技术委员会.网络安全实践指南-欧盟GDPR关注点[EB/OL].(2018-05-25)[2020-2-12]. https://www.tc260.org.cn/upload/2018-05-25/1527251794595094938.pdf.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

王德政.针对生物识别信息的刑法保护:现实境遇与完善路径——以四川“人脸识别案”为切入点[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(2):133~143

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:624
  • PDF: 1626
  • HTML: 2170
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Revised:December 10,2020
  • Online: March 13,2021
Article QR Code