2025年6月30日 周一
New information dissemination technology and the “empowerment” of judges: An empirical study based on the use and evaluation of new media by judges
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D926.2

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [11]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The application of new information communication technologies in the field of justice in the new media era is profoundly affecting the relationship between justice and the public. Among them, judges are full of expectations for new information communication technologies, and it is a rare opportunity to promote the openness of justice and the realization of judicial justice. The article studies the new media contact and information dissemination status of the "judge" group as one of the "audiences" of judicial publicity. The article finds that the relationship between new information dissemination technology and judges' "empowerment" effect is complex and dynamic. New communication technologies have played an active role in obtaining more social resources for judges, promoting the improvement of the law, and combining the legal and social effects of judgments, but the issue of "empowerment" in the pursuit of the goal of "same judgment in the same case" is complex. At the same time, the "empowerment" of judges by new information dissemination technology is also facing the real dilemma. Therefore, in order to strengthen the "empowerment" effect of new information communication technologies on judges, it is necessary to upgrade the concept and strengthen the system construction, which has become one of the important ways to achieve the goal of judicial openness and justice.

    Reference
    [1] 胡百精.互联网、公共危机与社会认同[J].山东社会科学,2016(4):5-12.
    [2] 王春晓,朱虹,束晓舒.权力感与网络口碑传播:"第二道数字鸿沟"视角下的网络赋权实现[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2015(9):132-138.
    [3] 曼纽尔·卡斯特:传播力[M].汤景泰,星辰,译.北京社科文献出版社2018:8.
    [4] 黄月琴.新媒介技术视野下的传播与赋权研究[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(6):140-145,164.
    [5] 朱逸,李秀玫,郑雯.网络赋权的双重性:形式化增能与实质性缺失:基于对社会底层群体的观察[J].天府新论,2015(5):34-40.
    [6] 丁未.新媒体赋权:理论建构与个案分析:以中国稀有血型群体网络白组织为例[J].开放时代,2011(1):124-145.
    [7] 靳昊.中国裁判文书网累计公布裁判文书4260余万篇访问总量逾132亿次[N].光明日报,2018-02-28(3).
    [8] 高一飞.走向透明的中国司法:兼评中国司法公开改革[J].中州学刊,2012(06):60-64.
    [9] 蒋惠岭.审判公开原则生命力之复兴[J].法制资讯,2010(11):62-65.
    [10] 通木尔,李扬.论信息的对称性对司法公开的影响[C]//王小林.信息化时代司法公开的逻辑与进路.北京:人民法院出版社,2015:159.
    [11] 易前良.平台中心化:网络传播形态变迁中的权力聚集:兼论互联网赋权研究的"平台"视角[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2019(9):6-12.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

杨秀,刘燕,陈瑶.新的信息传播技术与法官的“赋权”问题——基于法官新媒体使用及其评价的实证研究[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2021,27(4):149~159

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Online: August 19,2021
Article QR Code