2025年8月22日 周五
Construction of macro-ecological regulation mechanism of river basin under the background of enactment of Yellow River Protection Law
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D922.682;X321

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [50]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Guided by the national strategic goals of ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin, in view of the integrity, complexity and super-large scale of ecological protection and management of Yellow River Basin, simply relying on the traditional administrative control means aimed at environmental protection elements is not enough to achieve the established goals and tasks of ecological protection and high-quality development. According to the national goal and strategic orientation of ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin, and based on the natural, economic and social attributes of the ecosystem, it is necessary for the state to play the role of macro-ecological regulation with "high promotion". The driving force of overall, systematic and coordinated guiding regulation means should be used to strengthen the means, tools and mechanisms of ecological protection and management in the Yellow River Basin at the macro level. The macro-ecological regulation of the Yellow River Basin is to play the role of the state in the systematic regulation of the overall spatial governance and legal management, based on the logical relationship of "strategic needs - overall goals of ecological protection-state responsibilities". The application of "target + planning + tools" is the core element of the establishment of macro-ecological regulation mechanism. Under the objective requirement of advancing law-based governance in all respects, the macro-ecological regulation mechanism of the Yellow River Basin, which is centered on the axis of "target + planning + tools", should be confirmed, guaranteed and standardized by law, in order to realize the standardization, institutionalization and rule of law of the main body of power, the use of tools and the procedure of macro-ecological regulation in the Yellow River Basin, and achieve the strategic goals of ecological protection and high-quality development.

    Reference
    [1] 郭晗.黄河流域高质量发展中的可持续发展与环境保护[J].人文杂志,2020(1):17-21.
    [2] 习近平.在黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会上的讲话[J]. 求是,2019(20):4-11.
    [3] 王旭.当前生态环境责任落实的新思路[J].人民论坛,2020(34):81-83.
    [4] 徐澜波.规范意义的"宏观调控"概念与内涵辨析[J].政治与法律,2014(2):84-95.
    [5] 张震,石逸群.新时代黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展之生态法治保障三论[J].重庆大学学报( 社会科学版),2020(5):167-176.
    [6] 董战峰,邱秋,李雅婷.《黄河保护法》立法思路与框架研究[J].生态经济,2020,36(7):22-28.
    [7] 李小强.生态补偿制度的肇始、演进及其未来展望[J/OL].重庆大学学报(社会科学版):1-12[2021-06-16].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1023.C.20210412.1836.002.html.
    [8] 任保平.黄河流域高质量发展的特殊性及其模式选择[J].人文杂志,2020(1):1-4.
    [9] 邱秋.多重流域统筹协调:《长江保护法》流域管理体制创新[J].环境保护,2021(Z1):30-35.
    [10] 薛澜,杨越,陈玲,等.黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展战略立法的策略[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020 (12):1-7.
    [11] 左其亭.黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展研究框架[J].人民黄河,2019(11):1-6,16.
    [12] 大桥洋一.行政法学的结构性变革[M].吕艳滨,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:12-16.
    [13] 王旭.重大传染病危机应对的行政组织法调控[J].法学,2020(3):76-93.
    [14] 毛锋,曾香.生态补偿的机理与准则[J].生态学报,2006(11):3841-3846.
    [15] 张翔.基本权利的规范建构[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2008:18.
    [16] 高鹏程.国家义务析论[J].理论探讨,2004(1):19-20.
    [17] 陈海嵩.实现环境质量改善目标的国家义务构造[J].法治研究,2018(6):66-74.
    [18] 张守文.宏观调控权的法律解析[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(3):123-131.
    [19] 吕忠梅.流域综合控制:水污染防治的法律机制重构[M].北京:法律出版社,2009:72.
    [20] 王旭.论自然资源国家所有权的宪法规制功能[J].中国法学,2013(6):5-19.
    [21] 陈海嵩.中国环境法治中的政党、国家与社会[J].法学研究,2018(3):3-20.
    [22] 徐澜波.宏观调控权的法律属性辨析[J].法学,2013(6):93-104.
    [23] 张震.宪法环境条款的规范构造与实施路径[J].当代法学,2017(3):31-41.
    [24] 杜群.环境法与自然资源法的融合[J].法学研究.2000(6):119-128.
    [25] 陈海嵩.国家环境保护义务的溯源及展开[J].法学研究,2014(3):62-81.
    [26] 郑春燕.基本权利的功能体系与行政法治的进路[J].法学研究,2015(5):28-38.
    [27] 徐澜波,张辉.论宏观调控法体系的构成:兼论宏观调控法与财政税收法、金融法的关系[J].经济法论丛,2013(2):147-164.
    [28] 吕忠梅.关于制定《长江保护法》的法理思考[J].东方法学,2020(2):79-90.
    [29] 曾凡军.论整体性治理的深层内核与碎片化问题的解决之道[J].学术论坛,2010(10):32-36,56.
    [30] 邱秋.域外流域立法的发展变迁及其对长江保护立法的启示[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019(10):11-17.
    [31] 金泽良雄.经济法概论[M].满达人,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2005:68.
    [32] 漆多俊.宏观调控法研究[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2002:18.
    [33] 徐澜波.我国宏观调控权配置论辨正:兼论宏观调控手段体系的规范化[J].法学,2014(5):44-57.
    [34] 董战锋,郝春旭,璩爱玉,等.黄河流域生态补偿机制建设的思路与重点[J].生态经济,2020(2):196-201.
    [35] 车东晟.政策与法律双重维度下生态补偿的法理溯源与制度重构[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020(8):148-157..
    [36] 杨润高.环境剥夺与环境补偿论[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2011:189.
    [37] 乔家君,朱乾坤,辛向阳.黄河流域农区贫困特征及其影响因素[J].资源科学, 2020(1):184-196.
    [38] 刘学敏,张生玲,王诺.效率、社会公平与中国减贫方略[J].中国软科学,2018(5):49-55.
    [39] 管睿,王倩,余劲.扶贫资源输入对贫困地区分配公平的影响[J].资源科学,2020 (4):735-748.
    [40] 陈海嵩.绿色发展法治化的基本构想[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2018(6):20-26.
    [41] 葛察忠,龙凤,董战锋,等.中国环境税收政策发展报告2018[M].北京:中国环境出版集团,2019.
    [42] 柯坚,吴凯.新安江生态补偿协议:法律机制检视与实践理性透视[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2015(2):119-123.
    [43] 习近平.推进全面依法治国,发挥法治在国家治理体系和治理能力现代化中的积极作用[J].求是,2020(22):4-7.
    [44] 陈爱娥.行政法学作为调控科学[M].台北:元照出版社,2018:28.
    [45] 徐澜波.我国宏观调控程序规范的法律属性[J].法学,2017(11):139-153.
    [46] 中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于全面深化改革论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2014:104.
    [47] 徐澜波.论宏观调控法的调整方法:从经济法的调整方法切入[J].法学,2020(7):84-99.
    [48] 陈海嵩.生态环境政党法治的生成及其规范化[J].法学,2019(5):75-87.
    [49] NICASIO K.States rise to the front of climate legislation,but can a state-level carbon tax work?[J]. Indiana Law Journal,2019,94(2).
    [50] 王金南.黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展战略思考[J].环境保护,2020,48(Z1):18-21.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

肖融,柯坚.《黄河保护法》制定背景下流域宏观生态调控机制建构[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2022,28(2):195~206

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:351
  • PDF: 1033
  • HTML: 1497
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Online: April 25,2022
Article QR Code