2025年8月11日 周一
Research on the configuration path of urban talent attraction improvement from the perspective of talent ecology:Based onqualitative comparative analysis method of fuzzy sets
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

C964.2

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [53]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The Party Central Committee and the State Council have been deeply involved in the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education for a long time, and have continuously strengthened the talent support for modernization. Cities are "depressions" where talents gather and "highlands" where talents are used. The study of urban talent strategy is conducive to a glimpse of the basic situation of the implementation of the national talent strategy. At the same time, talents are the value source of urban creativity and an important symbol of urban attraction. Party committees and governments across the country usually attach great importance to the formulation and implementation of talent strategies in their own regions, and many cities have achieved competitive advantages in talent competition. It has become an important mission of academic research to explore the internal mechanism of urban talent attraction and scientifically answer why each city has talent attraction. However, the current academic research on the internal mechanism of talent attraction in China’s cities is not deep enough, and there is still a lack of induction and summary of the successful experience of urban talent strategy. In order to explore the basic mode of optimizing urban talent ecology to enhance talent attraction, fsQCA (fuzzy sets QCA) is used to explore and study 32 cities in China from the perspective of configuration about the relationship between talent ecology and talent attraction, and explore the path selection scheme to enhance the city’s talent attraction. The research finds that: (1) A single element of talent ecology does not constitute a necessary condition for a high city’s talent attraction, but optimizing the science and technology innovation ecology has a more general effect on improving the city’s talent attraction. (2) There are four configuration paths for different talent ecological environments to produce high urban talent attraction, namely, the social and cultural driven type under the economic leadership, the technology innovation-life-nature driven type under the economic leadership, the life-driven type under the economic leadership, and the technology-driven type. Through a brief review of talent policies and relevant factor endowments in each city, it is found that the practice of talent ecological construction in each city is highly consistent with the four configuration paths, that is, a mutually corroborating relationship has been formed. In addition, there are also two types of talent ecological configurations in cities that are not highly attractive to talents. One is that all elements of the urban talent ecology are in a non high level. The other is that under a good natural ecological environment, cities do not attach importance to economic development, scientific and technological innovation, ignore the living environment and social and cultural needs of talents, and cannot improve the attractiveness of cities to talents. In general, the induction and summary of urban talent ecological configuration path show that there are many common laws to follow in the realization of urban talent attraction, which has important implications for Chinese cities to precisely optimize talent ecology based on their own resource endowments to enhance the attractiveness to talents.

    Reference
    [1] 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅关于印发《2002-2005年全国人才队伍建设规划纲要》的通知[EB/OL].(2002-06-11)[2022-09-17].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/gk_gbgg/moe_0/moe_8/moe_26/tnull_404.html.
    [2] 习近平.在欧美同学会成立100周年庆祝大会上的讲话 [N]. 人民日报,2013-10-22(02).
    [3] 习近平:在中国科学院第十九次院士大会、中国工程院第十四次院士大会上的讲话[EB/OL].(2018-05-28)[2022-06-11].http://news.youth.cn/sz/201805/t20180528_11630791.htm.
    [4] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告(2022年10月16日)[N]. 人民日报,2022-10-26(01).
    [5] 胡本田, 曹欢.长三角高质量一体化发展研究——基于人才吸引力视角 [J]. 华东经济管理, 2020(10): 1-10.
    [6] BRONFENBRENNER U.Theecology of human development:Experiments by nature and design[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1979.
    [7] DEOLALIKAR A B,HASAN R,KHAN H,et al.Human resource development and the Asian economic crisis:Facts, issues and policy[M].Washington:University of Washington,1999.
    [8] MELLANDER C,FLORIDA R.Creativity,talent,and regional wages in Sweden[J].Annals of Regional Science,2011,46(3):637-660.
    [9] HARRIS L C,OGBONNA E.Strategic human resource management,market orientation,and organizational performance[J].Journal of Business Research,2001,51(2):157-166.
    [10] 陈建俞, 沈慧青.中国人才生态学研究现状及发展趋势 [J]. 科技导报, 2019(10): 74-80.
    [11] PRAHALAD C.The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid:Eradicating poverty through profits[J].International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,2005,54(2):23-27.
    [12] NG P T. Singapore’s response to the global war for talent:Politics and education[J].International Journal of Educational Development,2011,31(3):262-268.
    [13] CHRISTIAN R,SUSANNE M,SASCHA S.Urban attraction policies for international academic talent:Munich and Vienna in comparison[J].Cities,2017,61:27-35.
    [14] 李志,曹雨欣.我国西部地区柔性引才困境及路向研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2022(3):14-24.
    [15] RAVENSTEIN E.The laws of migration[J].Journal of Royal Statistical Society,1889,52(2):241-305.
    [16] JACKSON D,CARR S,EDWARDS M,et al.Exploring the dynamics of New Zealand’s talent flow[J].New Zealand Journal of Psychology,2005,34(2):110-116.
    [17] 孙博,刘善仕,彭璧玉,等.中国城市人才吸引力评价指标体系研究——以35个主要城市为例 [J].管理现代化,2022(1):129-35.
    [18] 王洪才.高等教育评价破"五唯":难点·痛点·突破点[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):44-53.
    [19] 郗永勤,沈佳丽.基于熵值法的福建省人才吸引力评价和提升路径探究 [J].电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2011(4): 14-8,97.
    [20] 姚连营.杭州城市人才吸引力及其提升策略[J].浙江经济,2018(16): 52-3.
    [21] 宋鸿,张培利.城市人才吸引力的影响因素及提升对策[J].湖北社会科学, 2010(2): 43-5.
    [22] 王永乐,李梅香.如何提升区域环境对高层次产业人才的吸引力——来自我国工业转型升级综合配套改革试点城市—绍兴的实证分析[J].人力资源管理,2013(10):143-6.
    [23] 杨勇,肖伟伟.城市人才生态系统运行机理与政策仿真研究[J/OL].科学学研究: 1-16.[2022-12-19].DOI:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220613.007.
    [24] 马茹,王宏伟.中国区域人才资本与经济高质量发展耦合关系研究[J].华东经济管理,2021(4): 1-10.
    [25] 陈井安,王学人.人才红利效应与中国经济持续增长[J].经济学动态,2012(5): 33-6.
    [26] 杜伟,杨志江,夏国平.人力资本推动经济增长的作用机制研究[J].中国软科学,2014(8):173-83.
    [27] 王全纲,张书凤.人才资本与经济协调发展的关系及其调控[J].社会科学家,2017(7):100-6.
    [28] 戴翔,刘梦.人才何以成为红利——源于价值链攀升的证据[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):98-116.
    [29] 徐倪妮,郭俊华.科技人才流动的宏观影响因素研究[J].科学学研究,2019(3):414-21,61.
    [30] 纪建悦,张学海.我国科技人才流动动因的实证研究 [J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2010(3): 65-9.
    [31] 曾建丽,刘兵,张跃胜.中国区域科技人才集聚与创新环境协同度评价研究——基于速度状态与速度趋势动态视角[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022(1): 50-9.
    [32] 朱菁,范颖玲.国外出行幸福感研究进展及其对我国未来研究的启示[J].国际城市规划,2018(4):74-83.
    [33] 琚琼,林蕾.通勤时间对主观幸福感的影响研究——基于CLDS(2016)数据的实证检验[J].中国物价,2021(5): 95-8.
    [34] 柯江林,孙仁斌.驱动经济高质量发展的人才流动双循环系统研究 [J].新视野,2021(6):27-35.
    [35] 潘宁,何土凤.城市房价对人才吸引力的影响分析——基于2019—2020年中国69个样本城市的实证分析[J].价格月刊, 2021(11): 1-7.
    [36] 胡荣华,孙计领.消费能使我们幸福吗[J].统计研究,2015(12): 69-75.
    [37] 聂伟,万鸯鸯.文化适应对少数民族农民工城镇落户意愿的影响——基于全国流动人口动态监测数据的分析[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):46-52.
    [38] 殷金朋,陈永立,倪志良.公共教育投入、社会阶层与居民幸福感——来自微观混合横截面数据的经验证据[J].南开经济研究, 2019(2):147-67.
    [39] 岳磊,刘乾.社会治理效能感与人才定居意愿研究——基于对河南省相关情况的分析[J].领导科学,2021(14):32-6.
    [40] 颜玉凡,叶南客.认同与参与——城市居民的社区公共文化生活逻辑研究[J].社会学研究,2019(2): 147-70+245.
    [41] 许和连,钱愈嘉,邓玉萍.环境污染与劳动力迁移——基于CGSS调查数据的经验研究[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2019(2): 68-76.
    [42] 罗勇根,杨金玉,陈世强.空气污染、人力资本流动与创新活力——基于个体专利发明的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2019 (10): 99-117.
    [43] 肖挺.环境质量是劳动人口流动的主导因素吗?——"逃离北上广"现象的一种解读[J].经济评论,2016(2): 3-17.
    [44] 张海峰,林细细.城市生态文明建设与新一代劳动力流动——劳动力资源竞争的新视角[J].中国工业经济,2019(4):81-97.
    [45] 杜运周,刘秋辰.营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J].管理世界, 2022(9):127-45.
    [46] 张喜峥,周文瑞,宋谊晴.居民消费升级促进产业结构优化研究 [J]. 统计理论与实践,2021(8):28-32.
    [47] 扈爽,朱启贵.城市舒适物吸引了人才吗——基于我国地级市数据的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报, 202244(6):28-41.
    [48] 程建青,罗瑾琏,杜运周.制度环境与心理认知何时激活创业?——一个基于QCA方法的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019(2): 114-31.
    [49] 池毛毛,杜运周,王伟军.组态视角与定性比较分析方法:图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J].情报学报,2021(4):424-34.
    [50] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017(6):155-67.
    [51] 陶克涛,张术丹,赵云辉.什么决定了政府公共卫生治理绩效?——基于QCA方法的联动效应研究[J].管理世界,2021(5): 128-38,56,10.
    [52] 李作学,张蒙.什么样的宏观生态环境影响科技人才集聚——基于中国内地31个省份的模糊集定性比较分析[J].科技进步与对策, 2022(10):131-9.
    [53] 杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020(9): 141-55.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

冉景亮,成浩源.人才生态视角下城市人才吸引力提升组态路径研究——基于模糊集定性比较分析方法[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,(1):151~164

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:531
  • PDF: 1360
  • HTML: 1292
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Online: February 28,2023
Article QR Code