2025年11月13日 周四
Research on institutional collective action in regional cooperation: Taking the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region as an example
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D630

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [17]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Regional governance is an important meso-level of metropolitan area management, and optimizing regional cooperation mechanisms is essential to the modernization of national governance. In order to clarify the difficulties and opportunities for improvement in the current collaboration mechanism, this paper discusses the participants and demands of institutional collective action in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional collaboration, analyzes the issues of concern and action costs of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei governments, as well as the ways in which different levels of official institutions participate in regional cooperation, explores the operating mechanism in the practice of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional cooperation, establishes the interaction logic among regional variables, cooperation mechanisms, cooperation risks and costs,and analyzes the main dilemma and solution mechanism of regional collective action. The study points out that the evolution of regional problems is the main source of promoting the improvement of regional governance, the basic variables of regional cooperation come from the actual situation of the region, and its root is the political, social, and economic network formed in the region for a long time, including: the existing system, regional structure and regional problems to be solved, the demands and urgency of actors involved in regional cooperation, and the spontaneous collaboration and interaction network between local organizations; Intermediary variables are process variables derived from basic variables in cooperative actions, including: the field and scope of cooperation, the composition of participants, the motivation of actors, and the degree of intervention of mandatory power; The basic variables and the intermediary variables act together on the regional cooperation mechanism and have an impact on transaction costs and cooperation risks, and ultimately affect the benefits and effectiveness of cooperation. In order to alleviate the dilemma of institutional collective action in regional cooperation more effectively, it is first necessary to comprehensively analyze the problem areas, local cooperation networks and other variables involved in the ICA dilemma in regional cooperation, and select a cooperation mechanism suitable for the nature of the dilemma by balancing the efficiency and cost of cooperation. Secondly, we should actively foster multilateral and bilateral cooperation between government agencies at all levels, promote the formation of a flexible, orderly and self-adaptable negotiation mechanism, ensure the self-interest and autonomy of collective actors, and develop the relationship of mutual benefit and trust, so as to obtain a stable impetus for ICA action. At the same time, it is also necessary to establish a common regional goal system, and try to achieve the overall regional goal through compromise and concession between individuals.

    Reference
    [1] 曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].陈郁,等译.上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1995.
    [2] FEIOCK R C.The institutional collective action framework[J].Policy Studies Journal,2013,41(3):397-425.
    [3] FEIOCK R C,SCHOLZ J T.Self-organizing federalism:Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2009.
    [4] 姜流,杨龙.制度性集体行动理论研究[J].内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(4):96-104.
    [5] KIM S Y,SWANN W L,WEIBLE C M,et al.Updating the institutional collective action framework[J].Policy Studies Journal,2022,50(1):9-34.
    [6] 崔晶,汪星熹.制度性集体行动、府际协作与经济增长:以成渝城市群为例[J].公共管理与政策评论,2020(4):27-39.
    [7] 锁利铭,阚艳秋,李雪.制度性集体行动、领域差异与府际协作治理[J].公共管理与政策评论,2020(4):3-14.
    [8] 锁利铭.跨省域城市群环境协作治理的行为与结构:基于"京津冀"与"长三角"的比较研究[J].学海,2017(4):60-67.
    [9] 黄晓军,黄馨.基于制度性集体行动的同城化合作机制研究[J].现代城市研究,2016(8):60-66.
    [10] 戴亦欣,孙悦.基于制度性集体行动框架的协同机制长效性研究:以京津冀大气污染联防联控机制为例[J].公共管理与政策评论,2020(4):15-26.
    [11] 陈鹏.城市群协调发展问题研究:基于纵向府际整合治理的视角[D].上海:华东政法大学,2020.
    [12] 穆学明.京津冀区域的结构优化与城镇布局:T字型城市带的规划建设与开发模式[J].城市,1995(1):21-25.
    [13] 孙洪铭.从京津冀更大的地域空间研究北京城市的发展[J].城市问题,1993(4):36-40.
    [14] 北京市 华北地区第七次省市长主席联席会在京召开[M]//任俨.中国横向经济年鉴.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991:255.
    [15] 刘永斌.区域联合的新成果:迅速发展的环京经济协作区[J].中外管理导报,1993(2):52-53.
    [16] 8月20日环京经济协作区在北京正式成立[M]//王振川.中国改革开放新时期年鉴.北京:中国民主法制出版社,1988:615-616.
    [17] 陶希东.美国大都市区"政府跨界协作"的经验与启示[J].城市观察,2020(4):77-87.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

杨卡.区域协作中制度性集体行动研究——以京津冀区域为例[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,(2):50~63

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:504
  • PDF: 1263
  • HTML: 2535
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Online: May 08,2023
Article QR Code