2025年11月13日 周四
Study on separate legislation of natural regionalization: Taking “Yangtze River Protection Law” as an example
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

D922.68

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [21]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The Yangtze River Protection Law is the first independent law in China specifically focused on natural zoning. However, existing research has mainly emphasized its impact on environmental protection in the Yangtze River Basin, while neglecting its significance as a guide and reference for independent laws on natural zoning. In fact, the Yangtze River Protection Law provides important insights into three key questions regarding environmental rule of law:why does natural zoning require separate legislation? What kind of natural zoning can be subject to independent laws? How should laws on natural zoning be formulated? Particularly in the current emphasis on legislative restraint, enacting a separate law for the Yangtze River's natural zoning instead of amending existing environmental laws related to its protection reflects profound legislative considerations and rich research value.Using the Yangtze River Protection Law as a basis, conducting an in-depth exploration of these three questions not only benefits future innovations and developments of this law but also provides more comprehensive theoretical support for newly enacted environmental laws such as the Yellow River Protection Law and Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Protection Law. Ultimately, this will contribute to the development and improvement of environmental rule of law.The reason why the Yangtze River Protection Law was formulated and promulgated is due to the environmental uniqueness of natural zoning areas such as the Yangtze River does not align with existing universal laws, and there is a mismatch between environmental governance in natural zoning areas and the jurisdictional linkages of environmental laws. As a result, universal environmental laws cannot meet the specific needs for environmental protection in natural zoning areas, leading to a disconnect between the implementation process and effectiveness of environmental governance in these areas.While it is necessary to have separate legislation for natural zoning, not all natural zones require individual legislation.The Yangtze River Basin provides a standard model for legislating on natural zones.On one hand, the Yangtze River Basin possesses geographical and cultural uniqueness, which requires special measures for its environmental protection.On the other hand, it spans multiple administrative regions while functioning as an integrated ecosystem.Therefore, only those natural zones that possess both uniqueness and broad coverage will experience mismatches with existing environmental laws mentioned above and necessitate separate legislation.In order to make sure that legislation on natural zones can adapt to current legal frameworks concerning environment while better utilizing their unique advantages and roles, it is necessary to grant special legal status within the framework of environmental law systems by prioritizing their application during legal proceedings.Furthermore, legislation on natural zones has a principle distinct from existing environmental laws-integrity principle.Under this guiding principle, legislation on natural zones needs to adopt a legislative approach different from current ones by establishing local governments as regulatory targets rather than individual regulation, and assign legal responsibilities to local governments.

    Reference
    [1] 吕忠梅.长江流域水资源保护统一立法刻不容缓[J].内部文稿,2000(8):27-29.
    [2] 顾爱平.节制是立法者的美德:兼论立法理念的错位与变革[J].江苏社会科学,2010(5):117-122.
    [3] 徐以祥.论我国环境法律的体系化[J].现代法学,2019(3):83-95.
    [4] 吕忠梅.中国环境立法法典化模式选择及其展开[J].东方法学,2021(6):70-82.
    [5] 高中意.长江保护立法的理论建构:基于整体论的分析[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):34-41.
    [6] 徐海俊,秦鹏.流域立法视角下生态流量保障的制度供给:以长江流域为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021(2):183-192.
    [7] 吕忠梅.《长江保护法》适用的基础性问题[J].环境保护,2021(S1):23-29.
    [8] 夏勇,范煜.论《长江保护法》与《刑法》的对接[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022(2):111-118,185-186.
    [9] 长江流域水资源保护立法研究课题组.长江流域水资源保护立法问题研究[J].中国法学,1999(2):39-47.
    [10] 姜渊.探寻与建构中央和地方同时"在场"的环境质量目标制度:以环保督察常态化之争为切入点[J].政法论丛,2021(2):140-149.
    [11] 张祥伟.环境法研究的未来指向:环境行为:以本位之争为视角[J].现代法学,2014(3):102-115.
    [12] 徐祥民,宛佳欣.环境的自然空间规定性对环境立法的挑战[J].华东政法大学学报,2017(4):105-115.
    [13] 刘竹梅,孙茜,徐阳.《最高人民法院贯彻实施<长江保护法>工作推进会会议纪要》理解与适用[J].法律适用,2022(1):159-167.
    [14] 马世骏.环境保护与生态系统[J].环境保护,1978(2):9-11.
    [15] 陈金木,谢浩然,汪贻飞.《长江保护法》实施后联动修订《水法》的思考和建议[J].水利发展研究,2021(3):11-15.
    [16] 上海海事法院审判监督庭课题组,沈军,王岩,等.涉长江大保护海事行政审判疑难前瞻与规制路径[J].法律适用,2022(12):133-141.
    [17] 王彬辉.从碎片化到整体性:长江流域跨界饮用水水源保护的立法建议[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(5):16-29,111.
    [18] 邱秋.多重流域统筹协调:《长江保护法》的流域管理体制创新[J].环境保护,2021(S1):30-35.
    [19] 姜渊.政府环境法律责任的反思与重构[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2020(2):33-40.
    [20] 徐祥民.环境质量目标主义:关于环境法直接规制目标的思考[J].中国法学,2015(6):116-135.
    [21] 江苏省人民政府办公厅关于印发江苏省"十四五"生态环境保护规划的通知(苏政办发[2021]84号)[J].江苏省人民政府公报,2022(1):5-33.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

姜渊.自然区划单独立法研究——以《长江保护法》为例[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(2):223~232

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:304
  • PDF: 705
  • HTML: 2135
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Online: May 08,2024
Article QR Code