2025年7月16日 周三
New quality productivity and urban economic resilience: Theoretical logic and empirical evidence
Author:
Clc Number:

F299.2

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [52]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Modern cities continue to expand in scale and function, but at the same time their own vulnerability is constantly exposed. Natural events and sudden social hot issues may become the opportunity for the rise and fall of cities, and then affect the vitality of urban development. How to enhance the city’s ability to resist risks and develop stably has become an urgent problem to achieve high-quality economic development. The emergence of new quality productivity will profoundly change the environment and conditions faced by urban economy, promote the deep reform of urban economic operation and development mode, and have an important impact on the cultivation of new urban business forms and industrial development. Based on the panel data of 230 cities in China from 2010 to 2021, this paper constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system of new quality productivity around the three components of productivity: labor, labor material and labor object, and adopts a fixed effect model to systematically investigate the impact of new quality productivity on urban economic resilience. It is found that, first of all, new quality productivity can effectively improve the resilience of urban economy, and this conclusion is still valid after the robustness test of endogenous processing, replacement variables, sample elimination and control of interaction effects. Secondly, new quality productivity affects the resilience of urban economy through the internal path of industrial structure upgrading effect, talent aggregation effect and technological innovation effect. Finally, the impact of new quality productivity on urban economic resilience is heterogeneous in terms of resource endowment, government participation and administrative level, and it is more obvious for non-resource-based cities with high government participation and high administrative level. The research conclusions provide a new perspective for exploring ways to improve urban economic resilience in theory, and provide empirical evidence for accelerating the development of new quality productivity in practice. The features and innovations of the article are mainly reflected in: First, taking new quality productivity as the starting point, this paper innovates into the impact of new quality productivity on urban economic resilience, providing new ideas for in-depth understanding and evaluation of economic effects caused by new quality productivity, and enriching and expanding academic discussions on new quality productivity in the field of urban economic resilience. It provides useful policy inspiration for exploring new ways to continuously promote new quality productivity and enhance urban economic resilience. Second, it reveals and elucidates the internal influence mechanism of new quality productivity and urban economic resilience, evaluates the action mechanism of new quality productivity to enhance urban economic resilience from the perspective of industrial structure upgrading effect, talent aggregation effect and technological innovation effect, and expands the research boundary of theoretical black box of urban economic resilience. At the same time, the heterogeneous effects of new quality productivity on urban economic resilience are also explored from the perspective of resource endowment, government participation and administrative level. Accordingly, the research conclusions help to form more specific policy targets, and have important practical guiding significance for accelerating the development of new quality productivity and improving urban economic resilience

    Reference
    [1] MARTIN R,SUNLEY P.On the notion of regional economic resilience:Conceptualization and explanation[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2015,15(1):1-42.
    [2] MARTIN R,SUNLEY P,TYLER P.Local growth evolutions:Recession,resilience and recovery[J].Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,2015,8(2):141-148.
    [3] MARTIN R,SUNLEY P,GARDINER B,et al.How regions react to recessions:Resilience and the role of economic structure[J].Regional Studies,2016,50(4):561-585.
    [4] 刘晓星,张旭,李守伟.中国宏观经济韧性测度:基于系统性风险的视角[J].中国社会科学,2021(1):12-32,204.
    [5] BRIGUGLIO L,CORDINA G,FARRUGIA N,et al.Economic vulnerability and resilience:Concepts and measurements[J].Oxford Development Studies,2009,37(3):229-247.
    [6] 赵春燕,王世平.经济集聚对城市经济韧性的影响[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2021(1):102-114.
    [7] BROWN L,GREENBAUM R T.The role of industrial diversity in economic resilience:An empirical examination across 35 years[J].Urban Studies,2017,54(6):1347-1366.
    [8] 徐圆,邓胡艳.多样化、创新能力与城市经济韧性[J].经济学动态,2020(8):88-104.
    [9] 李建强,朱军,张淑翠.政府债务何去何从:中国财政整顿的逻辑与出路[J].管理世界,2020(7):41-55.
    [10] ADGER W N.Social capital,collective action,and adaptation to climate change[J].Economic Geography,2003,79(4):387-404.
    [11] CRESPO J,SUIRE R,VICENTE J.Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2014,14(1):199-219.
    [12] HUGGINS R,THOMPSON P.Local entrepreneurial resilience and culture:the role of social values in fostering economic recovery[J].Cambridge Journal of Regions,Economy and Society,2015,8(2):313-330.
    [13] 孙久文,孙翔宇.区域经济韧性研究进展和在中国应用的探索[J].经济地理,2017(10):1-9.
    [14] 徐政,郑霖豪,程梦瑶.新质生产力赋能高质量发展的内在逻辑与实践构想[J].当代经济研究,2023(11):51-58.
    [15] 高帆."新质生产力"的提出逻辑、多维内涵及时代意义[J].政治经济学评论,2023(6):127-145.
    [16] 赵峰,季雷.新质生产力的科学内涵、构成要素和制度保障机制[J].学习与探索,2024(1):92-101,175.
    [17] 蒲清平,向往.新质生产力的内涵特征、内在逻辑和实现途径:推进中国式现代化的新动能[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(1):77-85.
    [18] 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023(10):1-13.
    [19] 石建勋,徐玲.加快形成新质生产力的重大战略意义及实现路径研究[J].财经问题研究,2024(1):3-12.
    [20] 任保平,王子月.数字新质生产力推动经济高质量发展的逻辑与路径[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(6):23-30.
    [21] 武峥.新质生产力赋能中国式现代化:理论逻辑、动力机制与未来路径[J].新疆社会科学,2024(2):20-28,148.
    [22] 谭志雄,穆思颖,韩经纬,等.新质生产力推动全球价值链攀升:理论逻辑与现实路径[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2024(4):49-61.
    [23] 贾若祥,王继源,窦红涛.以新质生产力推动区域高质量发展[J].改革,2024(3):38-47.
    [24] 任保平.以数字新质生产力的形成全方位推进新型工业化[J].人文杂志,2024(3):1-7.
    [25] 周洁.以新质生产力保障粮食安全:内在逻辑、机遇挑战与对策建议[J].经济纵横,2024(3):31-40.
    [26] 王珏,王荣基.新质生产力:指标构建与时空演进[J].西安财经大学学报,2024(1):31-47.
    [27] 蒲清平,黄媛媛.习近平总书记关于新质生产力重要论述的生成逻辑、理论创新与时代价值[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2023(6):1-11.
    [28] 袁航,朱承亮.国家高新区推动了中国产业结构转型升级吗[J].中国工业经济,2018(8):60-77.
    [29] 余文涛,吴士炜.互联网平台经济与正在缓解的市场扭曲[J].财贸经济,2020(5):146-160.
    [30] 杨慧梅,江璐.数字经济、空间效应与全要素生产率[J].统计研究,2021(4):3-15.
    [31] 杜传忠,疏爽,李泽浩.新质生产力促进经济高质量发展的机制分析与实现路径[J].经济纵横,2023(12):20-28.
    [32] 黄群慧,余泳泽,张松林.互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J].中国工业经济, 2019(8):5-23.
    [33] 丁志国,赵宣凯,苏治.中国经济增长的核心动力:基于资源配置效率的产业升级方向与路径选择[J].中国工业经济,2012(9):18-30.
    [34] 孙久文,陈超君,孙铮.黄河流域城市经济韧性研究和影响因素分析:基于不同城市类型的视角[J].经济地理,2022(5):1-10.
    [35] 张跃胜,邓帅艳,张寅雪.城市经济韧性研究:理论进展与未来方向[J].管理学刊,2022(2):54-67.
    [36] 李平华,宋灿.人力资本集聚、空间溢出与城市生产率[J].现代经济探讨,2020(11):47-55.
    [37] 杜传忠,李钰葳.强化科技创新能力加快形成新质生产力的机理研究[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024(1):100-109.
    [38] 程广斌,靳瑶.创新能力提升是否能够增强城市经济韧性?[J].现代经济探讨,2022(2):1-11,32.
    [39] BRISTOW G,HEALY A.Innovation and regional economic resilience:An exploratory analysis[J].The Annals of Regional Science,2018,60(2):265-284.
    [40] ROCCHETTA S,MINA A.Technological coherence and the adaptive resilience of regional economies[J].Regional Studies,2019,53(10):1421-1434.
    [41] CASTALDI C,FRENKEN K,LOS B.Related variety,unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs:An analysis of US State-level patenting[J].Regional Studies,2015,49(5):767-781.
    [42] MARTIN R.Regional economic resilience,hysteresis and recessionary shocks[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2012,12(1):1-32.
    [43] 谭俊涛,赵宏波,刘文新,等.中国区域经济韧性特征与影响因素分析[J].地理科学,2020(2):173-181.
    [44] 任宇新,吴艳,伍喆.金融集聚、产学研合作与新质生产力[J].财经理论与实践,2024(3):27-34.
    [45] 陈安平.集聚与中国城市经济韧性[J].世界经济,2022(1):158-181.
    [46] 刘传明,马青山.网络基础设施建设对全要素生产率增长的影响研究:基于"宽带中国" 试点政策的准自然实验[J].中国人口科学,2020(3):75-88,127-128.
    [47] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展:来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020(10):65-76.
    [48] 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120.
    [49] 林春艳,孔凡超.技术创新、模仿创新及技术引进与产业结构转型升级:基于动态空间Durbin模型的研究[J].宏观经济研究,2016(5):106-118.
    [50] 梁丽娜,于渤.经济增长:技术创新与产业结构升级的协同效应[J].科学学研究,2021(9):1574-1583.
    [51] 马海涛,王柯文.城市技术创新与合作对绿色发展的影响研究:以长江经济带三大城市群为例[J].地理研究,2022(12):3287-3304.
    [52] 李政,杨思莹.财政分权、政府创新偏好与区域创新效率[J].管理世界,2018(12):29-42,110,193-194.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

石玉堂,王晓丹,陈凯旋.新质生产力与城市经济韧性:理论逻辑与经验证据[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(5):29~45

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:892
  • PDF: 782
  • HTML: 886
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Online: November 12,2024
Article QR Code