2025年3月22日 周六
Discussion on the annual salary system reform of scientific research institutes adapted to the development of new quality productive forces
Author:
Clc Number:

F287.6

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [39]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The reform of the salary distribution system for scientific researchers is an important starting point for promoting the coordinated development of education, science and technology, and talent undertakings. As an important salary means for talent incentive in the new era, the annual salary system emphasizes goal and contribution orientation, takes trust as the principle, and has characteristics such as matching rights and responsibilities, equal emphasis on incentive and restraint, facing the future, and having certain flexibility. It can change the traditional way of evaluating talents by one-sided quantification, is conducive to stimulating talent innovation vitality and attracting high-level international talents, and is of great significance for promoting the development of new quality productive forces. Scientific research institutes are an important base for talent team building and the forefront of the development of new quality productive forces, and can be used as a reform pilot for implementing the annual salary system. However, at present, the implementation of the annual salary system in scientific research institutes still faces challenges such as inconsistent concepts, the determination of annual salary level standards easily falling into the old path of traditional assessment and evaluation, policy implementation being restricted by other policies such as post and personnel, and insufficient internal reform enthusiasm of units, which is not conducive to the cultivation and development of new quality productive forces. Through summarizing the experience and practices of the PI annual salary system of the Institute of Biophysics, Beijing, and the multi-level annual salary system of the British Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), it is found that the implementation of the annual salary system in scientific research institutes generally establishes a scientific research evaluation and assessment mechanism that can fluctuate up and down in line with the characteristics of scientific research. At the same time, a strict selection mechanism is formulated for talents eligible for the annual salary system, providing an important reference for the implementation of the annual salary system in scientific research institutes in China in the future. Based on this, this paper proposes an overall reform idea of combining overall promotion with local pilots, macro coordination with micro exploration, and salary reform with scientific research evaluation. And from promoting the establishment of a scientific talent concept and modern salary concept, clarifying the elements of the annual salary system, and accelerating the construction of an annual salary system, it puts forward the reform path for scientific research institutes to implement the annual salary system, to provide policy references for the income distribution reform of scientific research institutes in China in the new era. Specifically, first, it is necessary to promote scientific research institutes to further emancipate their minds and clearly establish the ideological concept that talents are the first strategic resource and innovation is the first driving force for development. Second, it is necessary to clarify the scope of application of the annual salary system and promote the establishment of a scientific and comparable mechanism for determining the annual salary. Third, it is necessary to strengthen multi-departmental coordination, clarify specific opinions and implementation paths for promoting the implementation of the annual salary system in scientific research institutes from aspects such as overall thinking, goal principles, and specific measures. At the same time, a negative list mechanism and integrity restraint system, and a talent selection system should be established.

    Reference
    [1] 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革 推进中国式现代化的决定[N].人民日报,2024-07-22 (01).
    [2] 何凤秋.科研院所薪酬制度改革的路径探索[J].秘书,2022(1):3-11.
    [3] 吴薇."唯论文"现象的蔓延与破解之道[J].大学教育科学,2023(3):4-12.
    [4] 马一德.新质生产力的知识产权驱动路径与制度协同[J].知识产权,2024(7):3-22.
    [5] 贺德方,陈宝明,汤富强.健全科研人员全职业生涯激励制度研究[J].中国软科学,2023(11): 1-11.
    [6] 王欣,张文静.知识型员工的全面认可激励研究:基于4家科研院所的问卷调查[J].技术经济,2023(10):14-25.
    [7] 习近平主持召开中央全面深化改革委员会第二次会议推动高校教师、科研人员薪酬分配制度改革[J].中国人才,2023(8):4.
    [8] 马永霞,仇笳熙."不唯"≠"不评":论人文社会科学成果评价方式的改进[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):54-66.
    [9] 陈志琴.我国高校年薪制改革初探[J].江苏高教,2003(5):125-126.
    [10] 郭明维,刘德雄.西部高校高层次人才薪酬激励机制初探[J].甘肃省经济管理干部学院学报,2007(2):48-50.
    [11] 孔瑛.艺术类高校战略性薪酬体系构建研究[J].北京教育(高教),2014(11):27-30.
    [12] 熊丙奇.学者"灰色收入"也有"潜规则"[J].人民论坛,2010(27):40-41.
    [13] 韩凤芹,索朗杰措,陈亚平.科研机构创新环境治理过程研究:基于多重螺旋视角的多案例分析[J].科学学研究,2023(11):2016-2026.
    [14] 邹红,肖翰,栾炳江."新财经"视域下导师如何影响博士生科研产出:基于某财经高校人事制度改革的经验证据[J].财经科学,2022(12):117-130.
    [15] 高抒.订立高校年薪制相关政策和规定[J].教育与职业,2013(4):6.
    [16] 邓亚琳.高等学校教师年薪制实行现状、问题及前景展望:以H省七所教育部直属高校为例[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2017.
    [17] 姚苏娟.我国公立医院院长年薪制框架及推行路径分析[J].医学与社会,2018 (4):34-36,42.
    [18] 黄长先,姚利群,罗曼.公立医院年薪制实践及其对人力资源管理的影响研究[J].现代医药卫生,2020(14):2295-2298.
    [19] 苏华.院长年薪制:收入和能力持衡[J].当代医学,2007(10):54-57.
    [20] 魏子柠.建立符合公立医院特点的医务人员薪酬制度:对福建省三明市公立医院年薪制的调研与思考[J].中国研究型医院,2016(3):27-30.
    [21] 陈亚光."年薪制"为什么叫好不叫座[J].中国医院院长,2016(14):86-87.
    [22] 赵映川.年薪制:大学校长职业化的薪酬制度重建[J].中国高教研究,2015(8):27-31.
    [23] 袁川,张婷,董泽芳.新质生产力视域下高校高层次人才流动意愿影响机制研究:以西部地区高校为例[J/OL].重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 1-14[2024-07-29]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1023.c.20240425.1343.004.html.
    [24] 李宗圆,伍山林.发展新质生产力需要处理好五大关系:以革命性创新为视角[J].上海经济研究,2024(10):5-16.
    [25] 贺德方,刘辉.深化科技体制改革增强新质生产力发展内生动力[J].智库理论与实践,2024(5):1-5,9.
    [26] 张杨,刘江彬.知识生产力赋能新质生产力的一般智力机制研究[J].上海经济研究,2024(9):17-27.
    [27] 张昊,彭小宝,宋伟.我国公益类科研院所创新管理:理论框架、实践难题与路径选择[J].科技管理研究,2019(13):110-114.
    [28] 李红锦,李胜会,许林.科技人才分类评价改革能否促进高校科研水平的高质量发展:基于9所高校改革试点的准自然实验[J].中国科技论坛,2021(10):114-123,179.
    [29] 曹洪涛,王威威,曹文军.高校高层次人才实施年薪制的思考与建议[J].经济师,2019(8):263-264.
    [30] 鲍威,姚锦祥,闵维方.法人化改革后日本国立大学教师人事管理制度的变革:从稳定保障型向流动竞争型的过渡[J].清华大学教育研究,2020(2):92-103.
    [31] 刘战.激励机制建设中存在的问题与对策[J].中国党政干部论坛,2005(2):29-30.
    [32] 凌丽敏,单文庆.科研团队薪酬激励机制优化研究[J].当代会计,2021(4):165-167.
    [33] 宋艳辉,朱李,邱均平."破五唯"背景下我国科研评价体系构建的几点思考[J].情报杂志,2022(2):190-197.
    [34] 杨梦婷,潘启亮.我国原创性科研成果产出的影响因素和激励机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2021(9):15-20.
    [35] 韩凤芹,周孝.科研院所绩效工资总量管理的改革创新[J].行政管理改革,2021(7):79-88.
    [36] 易丽丽.基础科研人才管理机制创新:以北生所为例[J].行政管理改革,2017(2):53-57.
    [37] 韩凤芹,李丹.以双层治理推动基础研究类院所改革[J].科研管理,2022(12):198-203.
    [38] 刘娅.英国公共部门研究机构薪酬绩效制度研究[J].中国科技论坛,2014(9):16-22.
    [39] 熊亮.探科研事业单位薪酬制度之变析完善薪酬调查之法[J].中国人力资源社会保障,2022(4):50-52.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

陈亚平,韩凤芹.适应新质生产力发展的科研院所年薪制改革探讨[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2024,30(6):152~163

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:120
  • PDF: 101
  • HTML: 180
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Online: February 13,2025
Article QR Code