With the rapid spread of new technologies with AI as the core, AI, as the main factor of new quality productivity, is deconstructing traditional production relations and production practice patterns in a revolutionary way, and accelerating the reshaping of the global governance pattern. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the Party Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping at its core has attached great importance to and made systematic plans for the development of AI. The Recommendations for the 15th Five-Year Plan have incorporated the development of AI and digital-intelligence empowerment into the national strategic layout, and the 2026 Government Work Report put forward for the first time the goal of creating new forms of smart economy. The construction of international rules for AI is a key arena for major-country competition and global cooperation, and a core link in improving the global AI governance system. Its fundamental goal is to mitigate systemic risks that may arise from the global diffusion of AI technologies through institutional arrangements, provide institutional safeguards for forging new forms of smart economy, and advance global AI governance toward greater fairness, rationality, inclusiveness and order.Institutional lag, technological monopoly, discourse hegemony, and the alienation of power have created uncertainty and risks for global governance and the development of new forms of smart economy in the era of AI. At the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Plus Meeting, General Secretary Xi Jinping put forward the Global Governance Initiative for the first time, with the core concepts of upholding sovereign equality, abiding by international rule of law, practicing multilateralism, advocating a people-centered approach, and emphasizing action orientation, provides fundamental guidance for improving the global governance system and forging new forms of smart economy. The construction of international rules for AI is an important part of global governance.To deepen the effective alignment and scientific adaptation between the development of international rules on AI and the advancement of AI as a productive force is an inevitable requirement for ensuring the harmony and stability of production relations, the sustained progress of productive forces in the global digital economy era, and consolidating the foundation for the development of the smart economy.Promoting the international rules of AI to be good is an inherent requirement for regulating the reckless expansion of capital logic, safeguarding the common interests of all humanity, and supporting the sound development of new forms of smart economy. It is urgent to establish an institutional link between the globalization of AI technology, the vision of a community with a shared future for mankind, and the new forms of smart economy, so as to transcend the illusory community with a genuine community. However, under the domination of capital, there are some problems in the field of AI global governance, such as the goal alienation of value reversal, the structural alienation of power monopoly, and the discourse alienation of communication imbalance, which are disintegrating the foundation of protecting the public interests of technology, and making the international rules of AI, as the guardian of the public interests of global technology tottering and seriously hindering the development of new forms of smart economy and the evolution of the global landscape. As a responsible major country, China takes Marxism as its theoretical guidance and follows the important expositions of General Secretary Xi Jinping on the Global Governance Initiative. Focusing on the fundamental goals of creating new forms of smart economy and cultivating new quality productive forces in AI, China advocates in the practice of global AI governance: building an inclusive and shared rule foundation through the vision of a community with a shared future for mankind, regulating technological monopoly and power alienation with the theory of capital critique, and enhancing China’s institutional discourse power with historical materialism. It has explored a subjectivity-driven global governance approach for AI, contributing Eastern wisdom to improving the global AI governance system and providing an institutional path for forging new forms of smart economy and enabling digital and intelligent technologies to empower the common development of humanity.