2025年4月1日 周二
Search Advanced Search
Total result 7
    Select All
    Display Type:|
    • Innovation elements agglomeration, anti-corruption and innovation efficiency promotion

      2024, 30(2):51-64.DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.jg.2022.10.003

      Keywords:innovation factor agglomerationcorruptioninnovation efficiencyspatial spillover effectanti-corruption
      Abstract (215)HTML (683)PDF 1.64 M (754)Favorites

      Abstract:How to realize the transformation from high-speed economic growth to high-quality development is an important proposition that needs to be solved urgently in the socialist economy with Chinese characteristics in the new era. The existing theoretical research and practical experience show that innovation-driven is the key breakthrough of the structural reform of supply-side, and effective clustering of innovative elements is a necessary condition to achieve innovation-driven. Thus, from the central government to local governments are vigorously promoting the effective accumulation of innovative elements. Existing research shows that government plays a very important role in the process of government-led innovation, and corruption, as a kind of government behavior that hinders the allocation of resources, may not be conducive to the effective accumulation of innovative elements. Based on this, this paper first introduces corruption into the theoretical analysis framework of innovation factor agglomeration and innovation efficiency. The conclusion of theoretical analysis preliminarily shows that innovation factor agglomeration is conducive to improving innovation efficiency, while administrative corruption inhibits this positive effect. Meanwhile, when anti-corruption efforts are strengthened, this inhibition effect may be eased to some extent. On the basis of theoretical analysis, this paper further uses Tobit spatial panel regression model and IV Tobit model to empirically test the above conclusions based on Chinas provincial panel data from 2002 to 2016. The empirical results show that the government-led innovation factor agglomeration effectively promotes the improvement of innovation efficiency, while the existence of corruption inhibits this positive effect. The conclusions of this study remain consistent after considering endogenous problems and conducting a series of robustness tests. At the same time, the analysis results of the spatial econometric model show that the spatial spillover effect of innovation factor agglomeration is significantly negative, that is, there is a phenomenon of separate governance among regions, indicating the lack of regional collaborative innovation. Further research found that the strengthening of anti-corruption efforts after the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China has effectively alleviated the negative effects caused by corruption, and also corrected the negative spatial spillover effects of the concentration of innovation elements, indicating that the anti-corruption actions after the 18th National Congress released the system dividend for the innovation driven strategy, and provided a living soil conducive to the effective concentration and allocation of innovation elements. The above findings have certain reference value for the path choice of high-quality economic development in the new development stage of China. Therefore, this paper argues that the innovation inhibition effect of corruption means that strengthening anti-corruption efforts and streamlining administration and delegating power can improve the institutional environment of innovation factor agglomeration. Notably, although anti-corruption can reduce the incentive to seek political connection and improve innovation efficiency, the distortion of market mechanism is the root cause. Therefore, we should handle the relationship between the government and the market well, transform the functions of the government, further improve the market mechanism, and finally form a model of innovation element gathering that focuses on market allocation and is supplemented by government guidance.

    • Theoretical logic of discipline inspection and supervision as a first-level discipline

      2022, 28(6):191-206.DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.fx.2022.09.003

      Keywords:discipline inspection and supervisiondiscipline inspection and supervision sciencefirst-level disciplinetheoretical logicParty-law relationshipanti-corruption under the rule of lawstate governance
      Abstract (285)HTML (464)PDF 1.77 M (592)Favorites

      Abstract:Discipline inspection and supervision as a first-level discipline contains unique theoretical logic, which is also the theoretical support for its standing under the category of law with other first-level disciplines. At the institutional level of discipline inspection and supervision, on the whole, it has gone through the discipline inspection stage dominated by intra-Party supervision, the supervision stage in which intra-Party supervision and administrative supervision are parallel, and the discipline inspection and supervision stage in which intra-Party supervision and state supervision are integrated. The development context of the three stages clearly presents the general trend of the development of discipline inspection and supervision, that is, the integration of discipline inspection and supervision. The evolution of the system from discipline inspection to supervision and then to discipline inspection and supervision reflects the growing maturity of the concept of national governance with the joint efforts of the Party and the law, laying the foundation for the discipline construction of discipline inspection and supervision. Discipline inspection and supervision, as a first-level discipline, has its special theoretical essence, theoretical significance and governance value. The three together build a theoretical gradient of discipline inspection and supervision disciplines. Disciplines such as traditional law, political science and Marxist theory are difficult to fully reflect the connotation of the new era of discipline inspection and supervision. Only by positioning discipline inspection and supervision as a first-class discipline and establishing a special theoretical system, can the theoretical essence of discipline inspection and supervision be fully explained. The significance of the first-level discipline of discipline inspection and supervision is that it is an innovative cognition of state power, which helps to promote a smoother relationship between the Party and the law, and build China’s independent discipline system, academic system and discourse system. Discipline inspection and supervision, as a first-level discipline, can show higher governance value, help to better transform the advantages of the anti-corruption system into the effectiveness of supervision and governance, and also open up an innovative model of national governance to provide the world with Chinese solutions. The theoretical category system of discipline inspection and supervision as a first-level discipline includes the cornerstone category and the core category. The fundamental purpose of discipline inspection and supervision is to ensure that the Party is in power for a long time. For this reason, the supervision mode should be transitioned from binary supervision to monopoly supervision to achieve more authoritative and efficient supervision. This is the cornerstone category of discipline inspection and supervision. Anti-corruption under the rule of law is the key means to consolidate the Party’s ruling position. Adhering to self-revolution as the center, striving to achieve high-efficiency anti-corruption, whole-process anti-corruption and full-coverage anti-corruption is the core essence of anti-corruption under the rule of law, which also constitutes the core category of discipline inspection and supervision. The next step in the construction of discipline inspection and supervision disciplines should focus on the division of secondary disciplines, the design of the curriculum system and the planning of talent training, and at the same time do a good job in the docking of practical directions to promote the efficient transformation of research results.

    • On the thought system of the rule of supervision law in Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law

      2021, 27(4):14-25.DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.fx.2021.03.001

      Keywords:Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Lawthe rule of supervision lawthought system of the rule of supervision lawreform of supervision systemanti-corruption legalizationhigh-quality supervision
      Abstract (400)HTML (889)PDF 1.62 M (1022)Favorites

      Abstract:Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law contains profound thoughts on the rule of law in supervision, and has formed a three-dimensional and multi-level system of thoughts on the rule of law in supervision on both theoretical and practical levels. From a theoretical perspective, it includes the Partys leadership thinking, thinking of the people as main body, the Chinese rule of law thinking, and the overall anti-corruption thinking; from a practical perspective, it emphasizes the implementation of the Partys leadership in anti-corruption practices, enhancing the peoples happiness through anti-corruption legalization, promoting the transformation of the advantages of the supervision system into the effectiveness of supervision and governance, and promoting the high-quality development of anti-corruption work with high-quality supervision. The legal thought system of supervision expresses the basic logic and core meaning of the continuous deepening of the reform of the state supervision system in the new era, that is, the Party uses the rule of law to realize the comprehensive supervision of the operation of public power. Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law has developed the thinking on the rule of law in supervision and led the practice of the rule of law in supervision to a new height. The Partys leadership is more embodied in systems in promoting the comprehensive rule of law, anti-corruption is more effective for the people, the rule of law is more supported by talents, and the comprehensive anti-corruption is more guaranteed by the rule of law.

    • Grid-based governance mechanism of internet public opinion about corruption cases

      2020, 26(6):211-221.DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.gg.2019.06.001

      Keywords:combat corruption and build a clean governmentnetwork anti-corruptioninternet public opinion about corruption casesgrid-based managementsocial governancesystem innovation
      Abstract (659)HTML (1864)PDF 1.69 M (1380)Favorites

      Abstract:In the era of big data, the internet has become an important tool for the public to participate in anti-corruption campaign. Internet public opinion about corruption cases is becoming more and more important in the work of combating corruption and building a clean government. However, this kind of online opinion is uncertain as it is prone to trigger derivative effect. Effective response to internet public opinion about corruption cases has become an important issue to be solved in combating corruption and building a clean government. The response mechanism of internet public opinion about corruption cases implemented by local governments provides new ways and methods for innovating public opinion monitoring mode, improving the efficiency of research, analysis and disposal, and realizing the active response to internet public opinion about corruption cases. The study concludes that the grid-based governance mechanism of internet public opinion about corruption cases is a set of mechanisms including grid-based monitoring technology platform and grid-based public opinion monitoring, early warning, studying and judging, and guiding and handling. The popularization and application of grid-based governance mechanism need to further change the public opinion response concept, optimize the information technology platform, and improve the corresponding system guarantee.

    • The cognition of the judicial facts and the media reality on the Network anti-corruption

      2016, 22(5):130-134.DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2016.05.013

      Keywords:Network anti-corruptionjudicial factsmedia realityrationality
      Abstract (1055)HTML (472)PDF 1.23 M (1155)Favorites

      Abstract:Nowadays, the prosperity of the Network anti-corruption is playing great promotion roles in combating corruption and in building a clean government. Considering the current situation of anti-corruption, there are still some gaps between the focus of the Network anti-corruption and the judicial facts, and the judicial decisions that house sister had no a single room caused so much doubts. How was the gulf between the media realities and the judicial facts caused? How to confront the difference between the media reality and the judicial facts rationally? All of these problems are involved in the cognition of the judicial facts and the media reality.

    • Current Situation and Countermeasure Research of Network Anti-corruption in China Based on Ten Typical Cases Analysis of Network Anti-corruption

      2014, 20(6):153-159.DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2014.06.021

      Keywords:network anti-corruption supervision by public opinion countermeasure
      Abstract (1552)HTML (768)PDF 1.57 M (1168)Favorites

      Abstract:With the rapid development of modern society, the network technology is applied into the tide of anti-corruption. Through the analysis of 10 typical network anti-corruption cases, it can be reflected that network anti-corruption is the embodiment of general acceptance of civil society, with high anti-corruption efficiency and convenience, and reduces the risk of report. At the same time, there are also some problems in network anti-corruption. Based on these factors, the author proposes that builds the network anti-corruption culture in macro, perfects the network anti-corruption system in meso, and improves network anti-corruption body quality in micro. At last, this paper puts forward some countermeasures.

    • On the Systematization of Anti-corruption of Internet Supervision by Public Opinion

      2013, 19(3):125-132.DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2013.03.020

      Keywords:Internet supervisory by public opinion anti-corruption systematization
      Abstract (2141)HTML (720)PDF 1.80 M (1344)Favorites

      Abstract:The Internet supervision by public opinion has the unique advantage of anti-corruption,but is subject to truth, contingency and tort. These problems are related to system causes, so constructing relevant system is very important for anti-corruption of Internet supervision by public opinion. From the perspective of users, self-discipline based on limited real-name system and heteronomy based on legal norms are equally important. From the perspective of the media, we should establish platform construction mechanism of Internet supervision by public opinion, monitoring and guiding mechanism of Internet public opinion, media cooperation and innovation mechanism. Looked from the government, we should focus on promoting information disclosure mechanism of the government, rapid reaction mechanism of public opinion, investigation and handling mechanism of the incident.

    Prev1Next
    Page 1 Result 7 Jump toPageGO