Main Problems in Academic Journal Evaluation between China and USA and the Future Evaluation Tendency
DOI:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Problems of commercialoriented, prejudice towards region and language, imbalance in disciplines, ideological prejudice towards social and humanities journals exist in American academic journal evaluation. Utilitarian makes Chinese journal evaluation the tool of scientific management and performance evaluation. Problems of overemphasis on bibliometric quantitative evaluation, low objectivity and lack of devleopment and internation of the evaluation data, standardless citation and lack of citation database directly result in the accuracy of the data, inaccuracy of discipline classification of the university journals, the evaluation lag and surveillance mechanism and localization of Chinese science and humanities journals evaluation exist in China’s academic journal evaluation. In the future, evaluation value, the application of text digging in journal evaluation, content relevance evaluation guided by social demand, transition from discipline evaluation to physics speciality evaluation, reasonable evaluation mechanism and harmonious academic atmosphere will be the evaluation tendency.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

李爱群,赵智岗,邱均平.中美学术期刊评价存在的主要问题及未来评价方向[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2010,16(4):73~81

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:March 17,2010
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online:
  • Published: