Comparison of the Citations Statistic Analysis Functions between Google Scholar and CCD: Analysis Based on the Joural Citations
DOI:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Journal Citation is an important index in the journals evaluation. Different citations databases always give different retrieval results. Such difference of citations statistic certainly has considerable influence on the journals evaluation. In this paper, the top 10 journals in the field of “Library, Information and Documentation science” were selected as research subjects. Then we searched each journal’s citations during 2007-2008 from Google Scholar and CCD (Chinese Citation Database). Based on the comparison of their results, it was found that presently CCD is much better than the Google Scholar for Chinese journals citations statistic but Google Scholar may represent the development trend of citation databases.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

邱均平,温芳芳. Google Scholar和CCD的引文统计分析功能比较——从期刊被引频次角度分析[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2011,17(6):84~89

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:October 13,2011
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online:
  • Published: