回到建筑:从“诗意栖居”到公共生活
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Back to the Building: From the “Poetic Dwelling” to the Public Life
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在《筑·居·思》中,海德格尔将建筑的本质理解为栖居,而栖居就是“终有一死者”与“天”、“地”、“神”的统一,建筑就是保护这种统一,让“天地人神四方”保存在其本质之中。海德格尔指出了建筑技艺的手段异化乃至人存在的“无根”状况,这一异化嵌在对“存在的意义”的遗忘史之中。然而,海氏建筑之思的起点与主题是“终有一死者之诗意栖居”,这就意味着,作为起点的“终有一死者”锁闭了开放的交往向度。甚至,其“诗意栖居”与和“他人”的共在是相互冲突的。如果说,筑造标志着人存在的方式,那么,如果它在指向诗意栖居的同时,遗忘了建筑活动发生于其中的城市—历史背景,这作为“大地”的历史背景就在对意义的追寻中被遗忘,从而,对建筑意义的追求依然从根底上就断裂了。

    Abstract:

    In 《Building·Home·Thinking》, Heidegger sees the essence of building as dwelling, and dwelling is the unity of “one of the dead”, “sky”, “land” and “God”. While the building is to protect the united to make them preserved in its essence. Heidegger points out the fact that architectural technology alienation and the “rootless” status, which is embedded in forgetting “the significance of the existence”. However, the architectural thinking of starting point and the theme is “one of the poetic dwelling”, which means, as the starting point of the “mortals” locking up to degree of communication. Even, its “poetic dwelling” and “others” coexistence of conflict.If built symbolizes human existence , then , it is in the direction of poetic dwelling, at the same time, forgetting building activity occurred in the city-the historical background, so the “Earth” as the historical background in the search for meaning in the forgotten, thereby, the pursuit of the meaning of building still fundamentally is broken.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邓明.回到建筑:从“诗意栖居”到公共生活[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2012,34(Z1):267-270. Deng Ming. Back to the Building: From the “Poetic Dwelling” to the Public Life[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2012,34(Z1):267-270.[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2012-09-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码