早龄期混凝土蠕变模型比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费科研专项(CDJZR12245501)


Comparison of creep models for early-age concrete
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China(No.CDJZR12245501)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对早龄期混凝土的蠕变松弛特性,以配比、强度以及不同加载龄期的混凝土蠕变试验数据为依据,对比研究了CEB-FIP模型、Muller模型、B3模型与笔者所建立变系数四参数Burgers模型的蠕变预测差异。研究结果表明:常用经验模型中,CEB-FIP模型具有较好的适应性,Muller模型对于高强混凝土的蠕变预测较好,基于固化理论的B3模型对于早龄期混凝土的蠕变预测值偏大,准确性较差。对比研究验证了变系数四参数Burgers模型中参数的物理意义与经验取值范围及其合理性与适用性。

    Abstract:

    Based on creep relaxation properties of the early-age concrete and concrete creep experimental data of different proportions strengths and loading age conditions, we carried out a comparative study of models for predicting creep CEB-FIP model, Muller model, B3 model and the presented Burgers model. The results show that, the CEB-FIP model has the best adaptability; Muller model is good for the creep prediction of high strength concrete; and the B3 model, which is based on the solidification theory, overestimates the creep for early-age concrete and shows poor accuracy. The results of the comparative study verify the physical significance and experience data range of parameters, as well as the rationality and applicability of the presented Burgers model with variable coefficient and four parameters.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏成俊,陈朝晖,陈珂,陈科.早龄期混凝土蠕变模型比较[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2016,38(1):61-68. Xia Chengjun, Chen Zhaohui, Chen Ke, Chen Ke. Comparison of creep models for early-age concrete[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2016,38(1):61-68.10.11835/j. issn.1674-4764.2016.01.009

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-03-01
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码