土压平衡盾构隧道施工引起的地层损失及影响因素
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

TU43

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(41572275、51478213、51278237);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2012EEM006、ZR2012EEM010)


Analysis of ground loss and its factors induced by EPB shield tunnel construction
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [31]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    收集中国已有地表沉降监测数据及土体损失率统计分析数据,结合长株潭城际高铁Ⅱ标树木岭盾构隧道进口树木林车站区间16个监测断面数据及其详细地层信息,分析土压平衡盾构隧道施工引起的地层损失规律影响因素。分析表明,土压平衡盾构隧道施工引起的土体损失率的累积概率较好的服从对数正态分布;土体损失率随着埋深或深径比的增大,呈现逐渐减小并趋于稳定的趋势,且两者关系可近似采用幂函数拟合;当H大于20 m或H/D大于3.25时,土体损失率基本稳定在0.75%附近,且对应地层信息表明盾构隧道施工时其上覆岩层呈现拱效应,说明盾构隧道施工中其顶部土层成拱效应可较好的控制土体损失;土体损失率或名义土体损失率随着盾构开挖通过时间的增加而逐渐增大,且趋于稳定,说明固结变形对名义土体损失率的影响较大,最大可达瞬时沉降所引起土体损失率的4.58倍。

    Abstract:

    The observed data of surface settlement and the statistical analysis data of ground loss ratio caused by EPB shield tunnel construction are collected. Combining with the monitoring data and stratigraphic information of the sixteen sections in the interval from tunnel import to Shumuling station of the Chang-Zhu-Tan intercity high-speed rail Ⅱ standard, the ground loss and its factors induced by EPB shield tunnel construction are analyzed. The results show that the cumulative probability of ground loss ratio caused by EPB shield tunnel construction better obeys lognormal distribution; with the buried depth and the depth to diameter ratio increasing, the ground loss ratio decreases and tends to be stable, and the relationship between the ground loss ratio and the tunnel buried depth & the depth to diameter ratio can be approximately expressed by power functions; when H greater than 20m or H/D greater than 3.25, the ground loss ratio is basically stable near 0.75%, and the corresponding stratigraphic information indicates that the overlying strata in the shield tunnel is in the arch effect when constructing. So, it shows that the arch effect of the upper soil layer in the shield tunnel construction can be better control the ground loss ratio. With the increase of the time of shield tunneling through face, loss rate and nominal loss rate of the soil mass gradually increase and tend to be stable. It indicates that the consolidation deformation has great influence on the nominal ground loss ratio, and the maximum value is 4.58 times of the ground loss ratio caused by instantaneous settlement.

    参考文献
    [1] 王梦恕. 中国盾构和掘进机隧道技术现状、存在的问题及发展思路[J].隧道建设,2014,34(3):179-187. WANG M S. Tunneling by TBM/shield in China:state-of-art, problems and proposals[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2014,34(3):179-187.(in Chinese)
    [2] 杨三资,张顶立,王剑晨,等.北京粘性土地层大直径土压平衡盾构施工地层变形规律研究[J].土木工程学报,2015,48(Sup1):297-301. YANG S Z, ZHANG D L, WANG J C, et al. Ground deformation characteristic due to large diameter slurry shield construction in clay in Beijing[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2015,48(Sup1):297-301.(in Chinese)
    [3] 郭玉海.大直径土压平衡盾构引起的地表变形规律研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2013,46(11):128-137. GUO Y H. Study on ground surface movement induced by large-diameter earth pressure balance shield tunneling[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2013,46(11):128-137.(in Chinese)
    [4] PECK R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,1969:225-290.
    [5] VU M N, BROERE W, BOSCH J. Volume loss in shallow tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2016,59:77-90.
    [6] VU N N,BROERE W,BOSCH J W. Effects of cover depth on ground movements induced by shallow tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2015,50:499-560.
    [7] FANG Q, ZHANG D L,LI Q Q, et al. Effects of twin tunnels construction beneath existing shield-driven twin tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2015,45:128-137.
    [8] MA L, DING L Y, LUO H B. Non-linear description of ground settlement over twin tunnels in soil[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2014,42(5):144-151.
    [9] 严键,何川,吴海彬,等.基于Peck公式的藏区公路隧道施工地面沉降预测[J].公路交通科技,2015,32(1):110-115,139. YANG J, HE C, WU H B, et al. Prediction of ground settlement for highway tunnel construction in Tibet based on Peck formula[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2015,32(1):110-115,139.(in Chinese)
    [10] 顾其波,郑荣跃,杨芬,等.宁波软土盾构隧道施工地表沉降分析[J].水位地质工程地质,2016,43(1):85-93. GU Q B, ZHENG R Y, YANG F, et al. An analysis of the surface settlement in the shield construction on the Ningbo urban rail transit[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2016,43(1):85-93.(in Chinese)
    [11] 胡斌,刘永林,唐辉明,等.武汉地铁虎泉-名都区间隧道开挖引起的地表沉降研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(5):908-913. HU B, LIU Y L, TANG H M, et al. Research on ground subsidence due to tunnel excavation in Huquan-Mingdu section of Wuhan subway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012,31(5):908-913.(in Chinese)
    [12] 邱明明,杨果林,姜安龙,等.地铁盾构施工地层变形预测及数值分析[J].深圳大学学报(理工版),2016,33(4):377-386. QIU M M, YANG G L, JIANG A L, et al. Numerical analysis of stratum deformation induced by tunnel boring machine construction for metro[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Science and Engineering), 2016,33(4):377-386.(in Chinese)
    [13] 梁荣柱,夏唐代,林存刚,等.盾构推进引起地表变形及深层土体水平位移分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(3):583-593. LIANG R Z, XIA T D, LIN C G, et al. Analysis of ground surface displacement and horizontal movement of deep soils induced by shield adwancing[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015,34(3):583-593.(in Chinese)
    [14] 于德海,张涛,姜谙男.考虑施工过程的地铁盾构仿真模拟及沉降分析[J].铁道工程学报,2015,7:88-93. YU D H, ZHANG T, JIANG A N. Numerical analysis of shield tunnel settlement considering construction process[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015,7:88-93.(in Chinese)
    [15] 孙兵,仇文革.双孔盾构隧道地表位移离心机模型试验研究[J].铁道建筑,2010(2):38-41. SUN B, QIU W G. Study on surface displacement induced by parallel twin shield tunnel with centrifuge model test[J]. Railway Engineering, 2010(2):38-41.(in Chinese)
    [16] 魏纲,庞思远.双线平行盾构隧道施工引起的三维土体变形研究[J].岩土力学,2014,35(9):2562-2568. WEI G, PANG S Y. Study of three-dimensional soil deformation caused by double-line parallel shield tunnel construction[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014,35(9):2562-2568.(in Chinese)
    [17] 韩煊,李宁,J.R.Standing. Peck公式在我国隧道施工地面变形预测中的适用性分析[J].2007,28(1):23-29. HAN X,LI N,STANDING J R. An adaptability study of gaussian equation applied to Predicting ground settlements induced by tunneling in China[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2007,28(1):23-29.(in Chinese)
    [18] 白海卫,宋守信,王剑晨.Peck公式在双线盾构隧道施工地层变形中的适应性分析[J].北京交通大学学报,2015,39(3):30-34. BAI H W, SONG S X, WANG J C. An adaptability study of Peck formula applied to predicting ground settlements induced by double shield tunneling[J].Journal of Beijing Jiatong University,2015,39(3):30-34.(in Chinese)
    [19] 魏纲. 盾构隧道施工引起的土体损失率取值及分布研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(9):1354-1361. WEI G. Selection and distribution of ground loss ratio induced by shield tunnel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2010,32(9):1354-1361.(in Chinese)
    [20] 晁峰,王明年,刘大刚,等.长沙起伏板岩地层盾构施工地表沉降预测研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2016,13(1):125-130. CHAO F, WANG M N, LIU D G, et al. A study on prediciting the surface settlement caused by shield tunneling in slate-based fluctuated strata in Changsha[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016,13(1):125-130.(in Chinese)
    [21] 蒋彪,皮圣,阳军生,等. 长沙地铁典型地层盾构施工地表沉降分析与预测[J].地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(1):181-187. JIANG B, PI S, YANG J S, et al. Analysis and prediction of ground surface settlements due to EPB shield tunneling of Changsha metro[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2016,12(1):181-187.(in Chinese)
    [22] ATTEWELL P B. Ground movements caused by tunneling in soil[C]//Conference on Large Ground Movements and Structures, London,1978:812-948.
    [23] RANKIN W J. Ground movement resulting from urban tunneling:predictions and effects[C]//Bell eds. Engineering Geology of Underground Movements. Proc. of the 23rd Annual Conf of the Eng.[S.l.]:[s.n.],1988:79-92.
    [24] CHI S Y, CHERN J C, LIN C C. Optimized back-analysis for tunneling-induced ground movement using equivalent ground loss model[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2001,16(3):159-165.
    [25] LEE K M, ROWE R K, LO K Y. Subsidence owing to tunneling. I:Estimating the gap parameter[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1992,29(6):929-940.
    [26] O'REILLY M P, NEW B M. Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom-their magnitude and prediction[C]//Proc Tunnelling 82, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 1982:173-181.
    [27] MAIR R J. Settlement effects of bored tunnels[C]//Proceedings of International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, London,1996:43-53.
    [28] 王振信.盾构施工对环境的影响[C]//海峡两岸轨道交通建设与环境工程高级技术论坛.北京:人民交通出版社,2008. WANG Z X. The environmental impact of shield tunnel construction[C]//Strait Rail Construction and Environmental Engineering Advanced Technology Forum, Beijing:China Communications Press,2008.(in Chinese)
    [29] FANG Y S, LIN S J, LIN J S. Time and settlement in EPB shield tunneling[J]. Tunnels and Tunnelling,1993,25(11):27-28.
    [30] 梁睿.北京地铁隧道施工引起的地表沉降统计分析与预测[D].北京:北京交通大学,2007. LIANG R. Statistical analysis and prediction for ground surface settlement due to tunnel construction in Beijing[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2007.(in Chinese)
    [31] 张书丰.地铁盾构隧道施工期地表沉降监测研究[D]. 南京:河海大学,2004. ZHANG S F. Study on ground settlement monitoring due to shield construction in metro tunnel[D].Nanjing:Hohai Uniersity,2004.(in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘金慧,丁万涛,戴尊勇,王焕,贾开民.土压平衡盾构隧道施工引起的地层损失及影响因素[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2017,39(5):1-8. Liu Jinhui, Ding Wantao, Dai Zunyong, Wang Huan, Jia Kaimin. Analysis of ground loss and its factors induced by EPB shield tunnel construction[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2017,39(5):1-8.10.11835/j. issn.1674-4764.2017.05.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1393
  • 下载次数: 1473
  • HTML阅读次数: 660
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-10-11
文章二维码