单向预应力混凝土空间框架弹塑性时程分析
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

TU378.4

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费(2015CDJXY);国家自然科学基金(51178487)


Elastoplastic time history analysis of unidirectional prestressed concrete space frame
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    参照中国现行结构设计规范,按不同抗震等级设计4个处于结构临界高度(24 m)和临界跨度(18 m)的7度二、三级和8度一、二级单向预应力空间框架(一级框架中柱"强柱弱梁"级差调整按建议公式弱化设计),然后基于OpenSEES有限元分析平台,进行双向地震动下的弹塑性时程分析,研究其在罕遇地震下的抗震性能和能力。结果表明:各框架沿两个方向屈服程度均不高、具有较好的整体抗震能力。其中,取较低抗震等级的7度三级和8度二级框架,其整体地震反应较取较高抗震等级的7度二级和8度一级框架略大,但差异并不明显。RC框架方向形成理想的"梁铰机制",PC框架方向形成"柱铰机制",PC框架抗侧刚度更大、抗震能力更强。抗震等级为一级的PC框架经弱化中柱设计后,可以有效引导框架在中柱出铰,但仍不能避免边柱少量出铰,可考虑适当加强边柱予以控制。

    Abstract:

    Four unidirectional prestressed space frames set at the critical height (24 m) and the critical span (18 m) were designed according to the Chinese codes, including two frames of the second, third seismic grade in intensity-category seven and two frames of the first, second seismic grade in intensity-category eight ("strong column-weak beam" in the middle nodes of the first seismic grade frame was weakened by the suggested method), based on the OpenSEES framework, elastoplastic time history analysis method was used to analyze the structural seismic performance and capacity under the bi-directional seismic waves. The results showed the yielding degree of every frames in both directions was acceptable and the global seismic capability was good. Besides, the frames which took a lower seismic grade had a slightly larger global seismic response. but the difference was not obvious. An ideal "beam hinge mechanism" was formed in the direction of RC frames and a "column hinge mechanism" was formed in the direction of PC frames, the lateral stiffness and seismic capability of PC frames were better than RC frames'. The PC frame of the first seismic grade formed hinges in middle columns effectively after weakening "Strong Column-Weak Beam", but hinges in side columns were still unavoidable, thus it was considerable to strengthen side columns.

    参考文献
    [1] 刘庆文, 王方斌. 预应力混凝土扁梁框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程震动, 2016, 36(2):42-48. LIU Q W, WANG F B. Experimental study on seismic behavior of prestressed concrete flat beam frame joints[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Dynamics, 2016, 36(2):42-48. (in Chinese)
    [2] 种迅, 孟少平, 张林振. 后张预应力预制混凝土框架节点抗震性能数值模拟与理论分析[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(5):153-159. ZHONG X, MENG S P, ZHANG L Z. ExperimentaI studies and fem anaiysis of seismic behavior of prestressed and non-prestressed high performance concrete beams[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(5):153-159. (in Chinese)
    [3] RAKA I G P, TAVIO, ASTAWA M D. State-of-the-Art report on partially-prestressed concrete earthquake-resistant building structures for highly-seismic region[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 95:43-53.
    [4] 王国林, 丁文胜. 现浇预应力混凝土框架节点抗震性能研究进展[J]. 上海应用技术学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 13(3):216-220. WANG G L, DING W S. State of research on seismic behavior of cast in place prestressed concrete beam column[J]. Journal of Shanghai Institute of Technology (Natural Science),2013, 13(3):216-220. (in Chinese)
    [5] 柳炳康,宋满荣,黄慎江,等.三层预压装配式预应力混凝土框架抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(9):99-107. LIU B K, SONG M R, HUANG S J, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of post-tensioned precast prestressed concrete frame[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2011, 32(2):24-32. (in Chinese)
    [6] 预应力混凝土结构抗震设计规程:JGJ 140-2004[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2004. Specification for seismic design of prestressed concrete structures:JGJ 140-2004[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2004. (in Chinese)
    [7] 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. Code for seismic design of buildings:GB 50011-2010[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
    [8] 王春武, 孟少平. 预应力混凝土框架结构的抗震设计探讨[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2005, 27(5):33-36. WANG C W, MENG S P. Discussion on aseismic design of prestressed concrete frame structures[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2005, 27(5):33-36. (in Chinese)
    [9] Building code requirement for structural concrete:ACI318-14[S]. ACI Committee 318, 2014.
    [10] CEN. Eurocode 8:Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part1:General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings:BS EN 1998-1:2004[S]. London:British Standards Institution, 2005.
    [11] 蒋薇. 中美钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震破坏模式控制方法对比[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2012. JIANG W. Comparative analysis on control methods of earthquake-induced failure patterns of RC frame structures in China and USA[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [12] 中国建筑标准设计研究院.后张预应力混凝土结构施工图表示方法及构造详图:06SG429[G]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2006.
    [13] 黄鹏. 单向预应力混凝土空间框架弹塑性时程分析[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2015. HUANG P. Elastoplastic time history analysis of unidirectional prestressed concrete space frame[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2015.(in Chinese)
    [14] MCKENNA F, FENVES G L. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees)[Z]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, 2013.
    [15] 郑文忠, 王英, 郝燕茹. 对预应力混凝土结构的几点认识与建议[J]. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2001, 34(2):12-15. ZHENG W Z, WANG Y, HAO Y R. Thoughts about prestressd concrete structures[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2001, 34(2):12-15. (in Chinese)
    [16] 杨红, 任小军, 徐海英. 双向水平地震下时程分析法中输入波的选择[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(11):40-46. YANG H, REN X J, XU H Y. Selection of input waves in time-history analysis under bi-direction horizontal seismic action[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2010, 38(11):40-46. (in Chinese)
    [17] Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures:ASCE/SEI 7-05[S]. USA American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005
    [18] 罗文文, 李英民, 韩军,等. 不同倒塌判定准则对评价RC框架结构抗倒塌能力的影响[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014(Sup2):241-246. LUO W W, LI Y M, HAN J, et al. Study on the effect of different collapse criteria on evaluating the collapse-resistant capacity of RC frames[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014(Sup2):241-246. (in Chinese)
    [19] HUSSIEN O F, ELAFANDY T H K, ABDELRAHMAN A A, et al. Behavior of bonded and unbonded prestressed normal and high strength concrete beams[J]. HBRC Journal, 2012, 8(3):239-251.
    [20] 刘光明, 杨红, 邹胜斌,等. 基于新规范的钢筋混凝土框架抗震性能评价[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报, 2004, 26(1):40-49. LIU G M, YANG H, ZOU S B, et al. Seismic Assessment of RC frame structure based on new design codes[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University, 2004, 26(1):40-49. (in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

简斌,汤甜恬,黄鹏.单向预应力混凝土空间框架弹塑性时程分析[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2018,40(1):1-8. Jian Bin, Tang Tiantian, Huang Peng. Elastoplastic time history analysis of unidirectional prestressed concrete space frame[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2018,40(1):1-8.10.11835/j. issn.1674-4764.2018.01.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1944
  • 下载次数: 1130
  • HTML阅读次数: 405
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-12-27
文章二维码