毛细管网供冷室内环境对比实验研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU831

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0700303)


Comparative experimental analysis of capillary radiant cooling on indoor environment
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在18℃供水温度下,对重庆地区毛细管网辐射供冷系统进行实验测试,分析了毛细管网顶棚、墙面、地面3种敷设方式的室内热工参数。结果表明:毛细管网顶棚、墙面、地面3种敷设方式供冷稳定时,人员活动区的平均温度依次为26.27、27.22、26.57℃,辐射表面平均温度依次为20.96、21.14、22.76℃,PMV依次为-0.27、0.32、-0.2,PPD依次为7.06%、7.47%、6.34%。在实验条件下,3种敷设方式供冷时室内温度均能满足≤ 28℃的要求,PMV、PPD均能满足《民用建筑室内热湿环境评价标准》(GB/T50785-2012)Ⅰ级热舒适评价指标。

    Abstract:

    Tests of capillary radiant cooling system in Chongqing were carried out and thermal parameter were analyzed in conditions of three different capillary laying modes (ceiling, wall and floor) with 18℃ supply water temperature. It concluded that when capillaries were laid on the ceiling, wall and floor respectively, the average temperature of working area was 26.27, 27.22 and 26.57℃ respectively and the radiation surface temperature was 20.96, 21.14 and 22.76℃ in turn. By calculation, the PMV of three conditions was -0.27, 0.32 and -0.2 PPD results were 7.06%, 7.47% and 6.34% respectively. It illustrated that all three laying ways at this experimental conditions could meet the air temperature requirements (no more than 28℃) and PMV, PPD attain thermal environment category I.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

梁秋锦,陈金华,段坤林,孙海,韩浩然,宋静.毛细管网供冷室内环境对比实验研究[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2019,41(4):185-192. Liang Qiujin, Chen Jinhua, Duan Kunlin, Sun Hai, Han Haoran, Song Jing. Comparative experimental analysis of capillary radiant cooling on indoor environment[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2019,41(4):185-192.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2019.087

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-29
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码