2025年4月3日 周四
期刊社主页编辑部首页编委会期刊简介过刊浏览
首页 > 过刊浏览>2022年第44卷第2期 >158-164. DOI:10.11835/j.issn.2096-6717.2021.083
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
基于模糊层次法的藏式砌体劣化风险权重系数试验标定研究
CSTR:
[cstr]
作者:
中图分类号:

TU362

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费（2020JBM039）；国家自然科学基金（52008020、51178045）；中国博士后基金（2020M680330）；高等学校学科创新引智计划（B13002）


Experimental calibration of risk weight coefficient of Tibetan masonry based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy method
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [17]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • |
  • 引证文献
    • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    藏式砌体广泛应用于藏式建筑墙体中，在自然灾害、人为损坏等赋存环境影响作用下，出现了裂缝、倾斜及材料损伤等多种劣化形式。基于科学手段对劣化藏式墙体的健康状况进行合理评估一直是藏式古建砌体保护的难点。基于模糊评价法和层次分析法，对影响藏式砌体墙的几种主要损伤形式进行综合研究，通过参数分析迭代耦合，得到裂缝、倾斜及材料损伤等多种影响因素的权重系数及层次排序，并通过两个砖砌体试验模型进行验证。结合砌体结构安全评价规范，给出砌体结构墙体性能的量化评价标准，解决了利用模糊评价法评估藏式墙体时损伤形式权重系数难以客观确定的问题。

    Abstract:

    Tibetan masonry is widely used in Tibetan building walls. Various forms of deterioration such as cracks, tilt and material damage have occurred under the influence of natural disasters, man-made damage and other environmental impacts. A reasonable assessment of the health of deteriorated Tibetan walls by using scientific methods has always been a difficult point for protection of ancient Tibetan masonry structures. This paper conducts a comprehensive study on several main damage forms that affect Tibetan masonry walls relied on the fuzzy evaluation method and the analytic hierarchy process. The weight coefficients of various influencing factors such as cracks, tilt and material damage are obtained through the parameter iterative process and verified by two brick masonry test models. A quantitative evaluation standard for performance of the masonry structure wall is given. It also gives the weight coefficient that objectively determine using fuzzy evaluation method.The research results can be used for the rapid comprehensive evaluation of the damage state of the dual-purpose Tibetan masonry structure, and provide a reference for daily inspection and safety assessment of Tibetan building walls.

    参考文献
    [1] 姜怀英. 布达拉宫一期工程维修理念和方法[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2009(6):77-83.JIANG H Y. Ideas and methods of maintenance of the Potala Palace phase I project[J]. China Cultural Heritage, 2009(6):77-83. (in Chinese)
    [2] 姜怀英. 从布达拉宫看西藏寺庙建筑演变中的几个问题[J]. 古建园林技术, 1994(4):9-20.JIANG H Y. Viewing several issues in the evolution of Tibetan temple architecture from the Potala Palace[J]. Traditional Chinese Architecture and Gardens, 1994(4):9-20. (in Chinese)
    [3] 滕东宇. 藏式石砌体静力性能研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2019.TENG D Y. Study on static performance of Tibetan-style stone masonry[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [4] 滕东宇, 杨娜. 藏式石砌体受压应力-应变全曲线特征研究[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(11):172-180.TENG D Y, YANG N.Research on the features of complete stress-strain curves of Tibetan-style stone masonry under compressive load[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(11):172-180. (in Chinese)
    [5] 滕东宇, 杨娜. 基于分层匀质化的砌体等效弹性模量的计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(2):408-415.TENG D Y, YANG N. Equivalent elastic modulus method of masonry based on stratified homogenization[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition),2019, 49(2):408-415. (in Chinese)
    [6] 傅雷, 贾彬, 蒙乃庆, 等. 西藏民居毛石墙抗压性能试验研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2015, 37(5):119-122, 63.FU L, JIA B, MENG N Q,et al. Experimental study on compressive performance of the rubble masonry walls of Tibet folk dwelling[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2015, 37(5):119-122, 63. (in Chinese)
    [7] 吉喆, 王汝恒, 邓传力, 等. 藏式石墙抗压性能试验[J]. 西南科技大学学报, 2017, 32(2):46-49.JI Z, WANG R H, DENG C L,et al. Experimental study on compressive performance of Tibet stone wall[J]. Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2017, 32(2):46-49. (in Chinese)
    [8] 刘伟兵, 崔利富, 孙建刚, 等. 藏族民居石砌体基本力学性能试验与数值仿真[J]. 大连民族学院学报, 2015, 17(3):252-256.LIU W B, CUI L F, SUN J G,et al. Tests and numerical simulation of basic mechanical properties of Tibetan dwellings stone masonry[J]. Journal of Dalian Nationalities University, 2015, 17(3):252-256. (in Chinese)
    [9] 蒋宇洪, 杨娜, 白凡. 基于RVE单元的藏式古建石砌体均质化研究[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(7):110-124.JIANG Y H, YANG N, BAI F. Research on the homogenization of Tibetan ancient stone masonry based on RVE elements[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(7):110-124. (in Chinese)
    [10] 常鹏, 吴楠楠, 王钊, 等. 藏式山地结构有限元模型修正及动力可靠度分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(6):13-20, 41.CHANG P, WU N N, WANG Z, et al. Finite element model updating and dynamic reliability analysis of Tibetan structure on the slope[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(6):13-20, 41. (in Chinese)
    [11] 刘威, 杨娜, 白凡, 等. 基于敏感性分析的协方差随机子空间方法参数优化[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(2):157-167, 178.LIU W, YANG N, BAI F,et al. Parameter optimization of covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification method based on sensitivity analysis[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(2):157-167, 178. (in Chinese)
    [12] 潘毅, 李玲娇, 姚蕴艺, 等. 砖石结构古建筑震后破坏状态评估方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2016, 51(4):704-713.PAN Y, LI L J, YAO Y Y, et al. Evaluation methods for post-earthquake damage state of ancient masonry buildings[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 51(4):704-713. (in Chinese)
    [13] 潘毅, 谢丹, 袁双, 等. 尼泊尔文化遗产建筑震害特征及加固对策:以尼泊尔Ms8.1级地震中3个杜巴广场为例[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2016, 48(12):172-182.PAN Y, XIE D, YUAN S, et al. Seismic damages of Nepalese cultural heritage buildings and strengthening measures:Case studies on three Durbar Squares in Ms 8.1 Gorkha earthquake[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(12):172-182. (in Chinese)
    [14] 魏智辉, 潘毅, 邱洪兴, 等. 勾缝加固砖砌体墙的抗压性能试验[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 49(12):184-188.WEI Z H, PAN Y, QIU H X, et al. Experimental study on compressive behavior of masonry walls strengthened with pointing mortar[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 49(12):184-188. (in Chinese)
    [15] 魏智辉, 潘毅, 邱洪兴, 等. 安庆市某基督教堂加固改造设计方案[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2011, 33(Sup1):209-211.WEI Z H, PAN Y, QIU H X, et al. Reinforcement and reconstruction design of a Christ church in Anqing City[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2011, 33(Sup1):209-211. (in Chinese)
    [16] 危险房屋鉴定标准:JGJ 125-2016[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2016. Standard for dangerous building appraisal:JGJ 125-2016[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [17] 民用建筑可靠性鉴定标准:GB 50292-2015[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.Standard for appraisal of reliability of civil buildings:GB 50292-2015[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
    引证文献
引用本文

白凡,杨娜,常鹏,旦增格桑,旦增卓嘎,滕东宇.基于模糊层次法的藏式砌体劣化风险权重系数试验标定研究[J].土木与环境工程学报（中英文）,2022,44(2):158-164. BAI Fan, YANG Na, CHANG Peng, Tenzin Kelsang, Tenzin Dolker, TENG Dongyu. Experimental calibration of risk weight coefficient of Tibetan masonry based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy method[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2022,44(2):158-164.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2021.083

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-02-14
文章二维码

您是本站第 4754718 访问者

通信地址：重庆市沙坪坝区沙正街174号，重庆大学A区     邮编：400044

电话：023-65111322；023-65111863     E-mail：xuebao@cqu.edu.cn

版权所有：土木与环境工程学报（中英文） ® 2025 版权所有