山西稷王山砖塔地震动力响应及损伤分析
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

TU365

基金项目:

山西省自然科学基金(201901D111089)


Seismic response and damage analysis of the pagoda on Shanxi Jiwang Mountain
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用数值分析方法对山西稷王山古塔在不同地震作用下的破坏形态及损伤进行计算分析,为古塔的抗震加固提供依据,采用塑性损伤本构计算模型描述地震作用下砌体结构的损伤失效,给出古塔在不同调幅系数地震波作用下的位移形态,获得层间位移、加速度放大系数等地震响应数值,讨论了地震引起的损伤分布规律。结果表明,稷王山古塔整体刚度分布均匀,塔顶加速度放大系数最大,尽管古塔底部墙体厚于上部,但在地震作用下仍在底层首先出现受拉损伤,并随地震强度提高而向上扩展;应力云图显示,地震作用下古塔底层最大主拉应力区呈斜向上扩展形态,易使塔体形成斜向裂缝;古塔薄弱层为底部3层及顶层。

    Abstract:

    In this paper, the failure mode and damage of pagoda on Shanxi Jiwang Mountain under different earthquakes were calculated and analyzed by numerical method, which provides a basis for the seismic reinforcement of Jiwang pagoda. The plastic damage constitutive model was applied to describe the damage failure of masonry structures under earthquake. The displacement forms of the ancient pagoda under the action of seismic waves with different amplitude-modulation coefficients were given,the seismic responses values such as interlayer displacement and acceleration amplification factors were obtained, and the distribution rules of earthquake-induced damage were discussed. The results show that the overall stiffness distribution of the pagoda on Jiwang Mountain is uniform, and the acceleration amplification factor at the top pagoda is the greatest. Although the bottom wall of the pagoda is thicker than that on top, the tensile damage still initiated from the bottom under earthquake, and it expands upward with increase of seismic intensity. The stress contours show that the maximum principal tensile stress area at the bottom of the pagoda under earthquake expands obliquely, which easily leads to the formation of oblique cracks in the pagoda. The weak layers of the pagoda are the bottom three layers and the top layer.

    参考文献
    [1] 潘毅, 王超, 季晨龙, 等. 汶川地震中砖石结构古塔的震害调查与分析[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2012, 38(6):156-159.PAN Y, WANG C, JI C L, et al. Seismic damage investigation and analysis of Chinese ancient masonry buildings in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2012, 38(6):156-159. (in Chinese)
    [2] 潘毅, 李玲娇, 姚蕴艺, 等. 砖石结构古建筑震后破坏状态评估方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2016, 51(4):704-713.PAN Y, LI L J, YAO Y Y, et al. Evaluation methods for post-earthquake damage state of ancient masonry buildings[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 51(4):704-713. (in Chinese)
    [3] 邱洪兴, 蒋永生. 古塔结构损伤的系统识别Ⅰ:理论[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 31(2):81-85.QIU H X, JIANG Y S. System identification for structural damage of ancient tower I:Theory[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2001, 31(2):81-85. (in Chinese)
    [4] 邱洪兴, 蒋永生, 曹双寅. 古塔结构损伤的系统识别Ⅱ:应用[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 31(2):86-90.QIU H X, JIANG Y S, CAO S Y. System identification for structural damage of ancient towerⅡ:Application[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2001, 31(2):86-90. (in Chinese)
    [5] DITOMMASO R, MUCCIARELLI M, PAROLAI S, et al. Monitoring the structural dynamic response of a masonry tower:Comparing classical and time-frequency analyses[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 10(4):1221-1235.
    [6] VALENTE M, MILANI G. Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 108:74-104.
    [7] SARHOSIS V, MILANI G, FORMISANO A, et al. Evaluation of different approaches for the estimation of the seismic vulnerability of masonry towers[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16(3):1511-1545.
    [8] 李胜才, 赵有军, D'Ayala Dina, 等. 砖石古塔地震损伤演化的数值模拟[J]. 扬州大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 17(4):60-63.LI S C, ZHAO Y J, DINA D, et al. Numerical simulation on the seismic damage evolution of masonry ancient pagodas[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 17(4):60-63. (in Chinese)
    [9] 张文芳, 田洲, 李叶, 等. 晋祠舍利生生塔砖结构的地震破坏形态研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2011, 33(3):7-12.ZHANG W F, TIAN Z, LI Y, et al. Research on earthquake failure configuration of the Shelishengsheng Pagoda brick structure in Jinci Temple[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2011, 33(3):7-12. (in Chinese)
    [10] 童丽萍, 唐磊, 王文华. 嵩岳寺塔地震响应及最不利受力状态分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2019, 35(2):147-156.TONG L P, TANG L, WANG W H. Seismic response and the most unfavorable stress state analysis of the pagoda in Songyue Temple[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 35(2):147-156. (in Chinese)
    [11] 卢俊龙, 司建辉, 田鹏刚, 等. 兴教寺基师塔动力特性测试分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2017, 47(21):105-108.LU J L, SI J H, TIAN P G, et al. Dynamic characteristic test analysis of Jishi Pagoda of Xingjiao Temple[J]. Building Structure, 2017, 47(21):105-108. (in Chinese)
    [12] 卢俊龙, 李晓蕾, 崔晓玲, 等. 实心结构古塔模型频域地震响应试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(9):238-245.LU J L, LI X L, CUI X L, et al. Tests for frequency domain seismic responses of masonry pagoda with solid structure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(9):238-245. (in Chinese)
    [13] 卢俊龙, 李传立, 韩鑫, 等.竖向荷载下砖石古塔的损伤性能[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2021, 43(1):164-175.LU J L, LI C L, HAN X, et al. Damage performance of ancient masonry pagodas under the vertical load[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 43(1):164-175. (in Chinese)
    [14] 张永亮, 汪振新, 刘尊稳, 等. 砖石古塔抗震性能评估方法及抗震加固措施研究[J]. 世界地震工程, 2019, 35(2):41-47.ZHANG Y L, WANG Z X, LIU Z W, et al. Research on seismic performance assessment method and seismic strengthening measures for masonry Pagodas[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 35(2):41-47. (in Chinese)
    [15] 汤永净, 赵红, 叶真华, 等. 古代砖砌体风化性能分析及风化程度评定[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2017, 39(3):67-74.TANG Y J, ZHAO H, YE Z H, et al. Ancient brick masonry behavior and weathering degree evaluation[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2017,39(3):67-74. (in Chinese)
    [16] 沈继美. 砌体匀质化过程的数值模拟方法与应用研究[D]. 长沙:长沙理工大学, 2012.SHEN J M. Study on homogenization process of masonry and its applications using numerical simulation[D]. Changsha:Changsha University of Science & Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [17] 杨卫忠, 樊濬. 砌体受压应力-应变关系[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2007, 28(1):47-50.YANG W Z, FAN J. A generic stress-strain equation for masonry materials in compression[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2007, 28(1):47-50. (in Chinese)
    [18] 韩鑫, 卢俊龙, 韦俊, 等. 西安八云塔动力性能与地震损伤机制[J]. 应用力学学报, 2020, 37(3):1305-1313,1408.HAN X, LU J L, WEI J, et al. Dynamic performance and seismic damage mechanism of Xi'an Bayun pagoda[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2020, 37(3):1305-1313,1408. (in Chinese)
    [19] 古建筑防工业振动技术规范:GB/T 50452-2008[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. Technical specifications for protection of historic buildings against man-made vibration:GB/T 50452-2008[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
    [20] 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.Code for seismic design of buildings:GB 50011-2010[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

姜珊,李建博,赵慧强,肖迎九,路国运.山西稷王山砖塔地震动力响应及损伤分析[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2022,44(2):165-173. JIANG Shan, LI Jianbo, ZHAO Huiqiang, XIAO Yingjiu, LU Guoyun. Seismic response and damage analysis of the pagoda on Shanxi Jiwang Mountain[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2022,44(2):165-173.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2021.122

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:364
  • 下载次数: 796
  • HTML阅读次数: 534
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-31
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-02-14
文章二维码