2025年10月1日 周三
期刊社主页编辑部首页编委会期刊简介过刊浏览
首页 > 过刊浏览>2023年第45卷第4期 >41-48. DOI:10.11835/j.issn.2096-6717.2021.192
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
考虑分区各向异性和渗流作用的边坡稳定性研究
CSTR:
[cstr]
作者:
作者单位:

1.兰州交通大学 交通运输学院，兰州 730070;2.中国科学院 西北生态环境资源研究院，兰州 730000;3.重庆大学 资源与安全学院，重庆 400044

作者简介:

张帮鑫(1997- )，男，主要从事边坡工程研究，E-mail：zbx724@qq.com。
brief: ZHANG Bangxin (1997- ), main research interest: slope engineering, E-mail: zbx724@qq.com.

通讯作者:

贾剑青（通信作者），男，教授，博士，E-mail：jqjia@mail.lzjtu.cn。

中图分类号:

TU413.62

基金项目:

甘肃省科技计划（20YF8FA042）；兰州交通大学“百名青年优秀人才培养计划”（152022）


Slope stability considering zonal anisotropy and seepage effects
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, P. R. China;2.Northwest Institute of Ecological and Environmental Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;3.School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, P. R. China

Fund Project:

Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province (No. 20YF8FA042); Foundation of A Hundred Youth Talents Training Program of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (No. 152022)

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    土体强度各向异性和渗流作用是影响边坡稳定性的重要因素。为使稳定性计算时边坡土体强度的各向异性更切合实际，提出对成层边坡土体进行分级加载和分区考虑强度各向异性的方法：将边坡土体最大主应力方向角与成层土相交区域设置为初始分区，然后结合有限元计算结果，推导各成层土各向异性强度参数计算公式，并即时计算各分区内土体强度参数；在逐级施加荷载过程中，根据计算所得土体强度参数，进一步调整初始分区，通过初分、细分和精分3级控制，确定耦合计算分区和各分区土体强度参数。在此基础上，建立考虑土体分区各向异性、未分区各向异性和未分区各向同性3种工况的流固耦合模型，分析边坡体应力场、位移场和渗流场的变化规律和特点，并采用强度折减法计算边坡稳定性。结果表明：考虑土体分区各向异性时，坡体平均应力最大值较未分区各向异性时有所减小，但较未分区各向同性时有所增大，其渗流域和流速较其他两种工况均有所减小；考虑土体分区各向异性时，计算所得边坡稳定性系数为1.109，较其他两种工况分别下降了2.8%和21.3%。

    Abstract:

    Soil strength anisotropy and seepage are important factors affecting the stability of slopes. In order to make the anisotropy of slope soil strength more practical in stability calculation, a method of graded loading and zoning of layered slope soil considering strength anisotropy is proposed. Firstly, the initial zoning is established according to the size distribution of the maximum principal stress direction angle of the slope soil and the intersection area of layered soil, and then, combined with the finite element calculation results, the formula for determining the anisotropy strength parameter of each layered soil is derived and the strength parameter of each zoning is calculated instantly. Secondly, in the process of applying load step by step, the initial partition is further adjusted according to the calculated soil strength parameters, the partition and the corresponding strength parameters of the coupling calculation are determined through three-level control of initial partition, subdivision and fine partition. On this basis, a flow-solid coupling model considering three working conditions: zoned anisotropy, unzoned anisotropy and unzoned isotropy of the soil body is established, and the change laws and characteristics of the stress field, displacement field and seepage field of the slope body are analyzed, and the stability of the slope is calculated using the strength reduction method. The results show that the average stress maximum value of zoned anisotropy is lower than that of unzoned anisotropy, but greater than that of unzoned isotropy, the seepage and flow velocities are lower than those of the other two cases; the calculated slope stability coefficient of zoned anisotropy is 1.109, which is 2.8% and 21.3% lower than those of the other two cases respectively.

    参考文献
    [1] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.SU Y H, LI C C. Stability analysis of slope based on Green-Ampt model under heavy rainfall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 389-398. (in Chinese)
    [2] FROUDE M J, PETLEY D N. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016 [J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 18(8): 2161-2181.
    [3] SUN W J, WANG G X, ZHANG L L. Slope stability analysis by strength reduction method based on average residual displacement increment criterion [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(6): 4367-4378.
    [4] RAO P P, ZHAO L X, CHEN Q S, et al. Three-dimensional limit analysis of slopes reinforced with piles in soils exhibiting heterogeneity and anisotropy in cohesion [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 121: 194-199.
    [5] XU J S, LI Y X, YANG X L. Stability charts and reinforcement with piles in 3D nonhomogeneous and anisotropic soil slope [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2018, 14(1): 71-81.
    [6] 罗凌晖, 周建, 蔡露, 等. 各向异性成层边坡的稳定性分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 50(8): 1883-1890.LUO L H, ZHOU J, CAI L, et al. Layered slope stability analysis considering anisotropy [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2019, 50(8): 1883-1890. (in Chinese)
    [7] 曾铃, 李光裕, 史振宁, 等. 降雨入渗条件下非饱和土渗流特征试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(2): 191-199.ZENG L, LI G Y, SHI Z N, et al. Experiment on seepage characteristics of unsaturated soil under rainfall infiltration [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(2): 191-199. (in Chinese)
    [8] ZENG L, BIAN H B, SHI Z N, et al. Forming condition of transient saturated zone and its distribution in residual slope under rainfall conditions [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(8): 1866-1880.
    [9] 何晓莹. 胶凝砂砾石坝渗流场与应力场的耦合分析[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2020.HE X Y. Coupling analysis of seepage field and stress field of cemented sand and gravel dam [D]. Xi,an: Xi,an University of Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [10] 王正成, 毛海涛, 龙顺江, 等. 流固耦合的多元结构深厚覆盖层透水地基的力学特性[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2017, 39(3): 151-159.WANG Z C, MAO H T, LONG S J, et al. Mechanical properties of multiple-structure thick overburden pervious foundation based on fluid-solid coupling [J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 151-159. (in Chinese)
    [11] 史卜涛, 张云, 张巍. 边坡稳定性分析的物质点强度折减法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(9): 1678-1684.SHI B T, ZHANG Y, ZHANG W. Strength reduction material point method for slope stability [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(9): 1678-1684. (in Chinese)
    [12] NIE Z B, ZHANG Z H, ZHENG H. Slope stability analysis using convergent strength reduction method [J]. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2019, 108: 402-410.
    [13] 刘亚栋. 考虑土体强度各向异性的边坡稳定性研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2018.LIU Y D. An investigation of slope stability considering strength anisotropy in soils [D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [14] POTTS D M, ZDRAVKOVI? L. Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: Volume two- Application [M]. Thomas Telford Publishing, 2001.
    [15] 李广信. 高等土力学[M]. 2版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2016.LI G X. Advanced Soil Mechanics [M]. 2nd edition. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [16] 吴芳, 张璐璐, 郑文棠, 等. 基于随机多项式展开的流固耦合非饱和土坡概率反分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(12): 2215-2222.WU F, ZHANG L L, ZHENG W T, et al. Probabilistic back analysis method for unsaturated soil slopes with fluid-solid coupling process based on polynomial chaos expansion [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 2215-2222. (in Chinese)
    [17] 林姗, 郭昱葵, 孙冠华, 等. 边坡稳定性分析的虚单元强度折减法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(Sup2): 3429-3438.LIN S, GUO Y K, SUN G H, et al. Slope stability analysis using the virtual element method and shear strength reduction technique [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(Sup2): 3429-3438. (in Chinese)
    [18] 刘红, 冯永珍, 张吾渝, 等. 主应力方向角对重塑黄土各向异性的影响研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2021, 52(3): 155-161.LIU H, FENG Y Z, ZHANG W Y, et al. Study on influence of principal stress direction angle on anisotropy of remolded loess [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2021, 52(3): 155-161. (in Chinese)
    [19] 张奇莹, 徐盼盼, 钱会. 泾阳原状黄土—古土壤序列抗剪强度各向异性及其机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(11): 2365-2376.ZHANG Q Y, XU P P, QIAN H. Study on shear strength anisotropy of undisturbed loess-paleosol sequence in Jingyang County [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(11): 2365-2376. (in Chinese)
    [20] 吕擎峰, 潘松杰, 李策策, 等. 重塑黄土-混凝土接触面直剪试验研究[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 56(5): 601-605, 614.Lü Q F, PAN S J, LI C C, et al. Experimental study on direct shear of loess-concrete smooth contact surface [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2020, 56(5): 601-605, 614. (in Chinese)
    [21] 李宝平, 王智, 张玉. 关中地区重塑黄土强度特性三轴试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2017, 57(8): 78-82.LI B P, WANG Z, ZHANG Y. Triaxial test study on strength characteristics of remolded loess in Guanzhong area [J]. Railway Engineering, 2017, 57(8): 78-82. (in Chinese)
    [22] 杨世豪, 苏立君, 张崇磊, 等. 强降雨作用下昔格达边坡渗流特性及稳定性分析[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2020, 42(4): 19-27.YANG S H, SU L J, ZHANG C L, et al. Analysis of seepage characteristics and stability of Xigeda Formation slope under heavy rainfall [J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 42(4): 19-27. (in Chinese)
    [23] 李丞, 蔡立明, 张伟锋, 等. 初始渗流场对渣土场边坡降雨入渗特征及其稳定性的影响[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2021, 43(2): 1-9.LI C, CAI L M, ZHANG W F, et al. Influence of initial seepage field on rainfall infiltration characteristics and stability of municipal solid waste landfill [J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 43(2): 1-9. (in Chinese)
    [24] 赵尚毅, 郑颖人, 张玉芳. 极限分析有限元法讲座:Ⅱ 有限元强度折减法中边坡失稳的判据探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(2): 332-336.ZHAO S Y, ZHENG Y R, ZHANG Y F. Study on slope failure criterion in strength reduction finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(2): 332-336. (in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张帮鑫,贾剑青,赖远明,王宏图,辛成平.考虑分区各向异性和渗流作用的边坡稳定性研究[J].土木与环境工程学报（中英文）,2023,45(4):41-48. ZHANG Bangxin, JIA Jianqing, LAI Yuanming, WANG Hongtu, XIN Chengping. Slope stability considering zonal anisotropy and seepage effects[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2023,45(4):41-48.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2021.192

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:506
  • 下载次数: 841
  • HTML阅读次数: 72
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-14
文章二维码

您是本站第 10528762 访问者

通信地址：重庆市沙坪坝区沙正街174号，重庆大学A区     邮编：400044

电话：023-65111322；023-65111863     E-mail：xuebao@cqu.edu.cn

版权所有：土木与环境工程学报（中英文） ® 2025 版权所有