低屈强比高强钢箱形柱抗震性能试验研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.重庆大学,土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2.重庆大学,山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点试验室,重庆 400045;3.中国人民解放军陆军勤务学院 军事设施系,重庆 401331;4.河钢集团钢研总院,石家庄 050023

作者简介:

聂诗东(1974- ),男,博士,副教授,主要从事钢结构研究,E-mail:nieshidong@cqu.edu.cn。
brief: NIE Shidong (1974- ), PhD, associate professor, main research interest: steel structure, E-mail: nieshidong@cqu.edu.cn.

中图分类号:

TU391

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51578089);河钢集团研发项目(H20200688)


Experimental analysis on seismic behavior of low yield ratio high strength steel box-section column
Author:
Affiliation:

1. School of Civil Engineering;2.Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cites in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P. R. China;3.Department of Military Installations, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing 401331, P. R. China;4.Iron and Steel Technology Research Institute, He Steel Group Co. Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050023, P. R. China

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51578089); R & D Project of HBIS Group (No. H20200688)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [16]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    钢结构的材料高强化是发展趋势,目前高强钢存在屈强比过高的问题,限制了高强钢在建筑结构中的抗震设计应用。对低合金高强度结构钢进行材性改良,研发出一种新型低屈强比Q620E高强钢。对此新型高强钢的抗震性能进行试验研究,根据壁板宽厚比等级设计截面尺寸不同的箱形截面柱,对轴压比为0.2和0.35的高强钢箱形柱进行低周往复加载试验。通过观察试件的破坏模式、提取滞回曲线和骨架曲线,从承载力、延性、耗能性能与损伤发展等方面对钢柱的抗震性能进行分析,并与Q690D普通高强钢柱抗震性能进行比较。试验结果表明,低屈强比高强钢柱具有良好的滞回性能和塑性变形能力;壁板宽厚比对构件承载力及延性影响显著;壁板宽厚比越大则刚度下降越快、损伤发展不连续;相较于Q690D普通高强钢,Q620E新型钢在力学性能与构件抗震方面均体现出较大的优势,可考虑在高强钢建筑结构中拓展应用。

    Abstract:

    The high strength of steel structure is the main trend. At present, the high yield ratio is the problem of the high strength steel, which limits the application of high strength steel in the seismic design of structures. A new type of high strength steel with a low yield ratio Q620E has been developed in HBIS Group by improving the material properties of low alloy high strength structural steel. In order to study the seismic performance of it, box-section columns with different cross-sectional dimensions were designed according to classes width-to-thickness ratio of steel columns. Low-cycle reversal tests were performed on box-shaped columns of high strength steel with nominal axial compression ratios of 0.2 and 0.35. The seismic performance of steel columns was investigated in terms of bearing capacity, ductility, energy dissipation performance and damage index by observing the damage modes, extracting hysteresis curves and skeleton curves of the specimens and comparing the seismic performance with that of Q690D ordinary high-strength steel columns. The test results show that the designed high-strength steel columns have good hysteresis performance and plastic deformation capacity; width-to-thickness ratio has a significant effect on the bearing capacity and ductility of the members; the larger width-to-thickness ratio is, the faster the stiffness dissipation capacity of the member decreases and discontinuous damage development occurs; compared with Q690D ordinary high-strength steel, Q620E steel shows greater advantages in mechanical properties and seismic design of the member, which can be considered for high-strength steel structures.

    参考文献
    [1] 施刚, 石永久, 王元清. 超高强度钢材钢结构的工程应用[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2008, 10(4): 32-38.SHI G, SHI Y J, WANG Y Q. Engineering application of ultra-high strength steel structures [J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2008, 10(4): 32-38. (in Chinese)
    [2] 施刚, 邓椿森, 班慧勇, 等. Q460高强度钢材工形压弯构件抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(10): 53-61.SHI G, DENG C S, BAN H Y, et al. Experimental study on the seismic behavior of Q460 high strength steel Ⅰ -columns [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(10): 53-61. (in Chinese)
    [3] 施刚, 邓椿森, 班慧勇, 等. 高强度钢材箱形柱滞回性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(3): 1-7.SHI G, DENG C S, BAN H Y, et al. Experimental study on hysteretic behavior of high strength steel box-section columns [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(3): 1-7. (in Chinese)
    [4] 陈素文, 陆志立, 李国强, 等. Q690D高强钢焊接截面柱低周反复加载试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35(12): 97-103.CHEN S W, LU Z L, LI G Q, et al. Cyclic loading tests of Q690D high strength steel welded columns [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(12): 97-103. (in Chinese)
    [5] 陈素文, 陆志立, 陈星, 等. Q690D高强钢箱形截面柱的滞回性能[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(8): 1135-1143.CHEN S W, LU Z L, CHEN X, et al. Hysteretic behavior of Q690D high strength steel box-section beam columns [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(8): 1135-1143. (in Chinese)
    [6] HAI L T, LI G Q, WANG Y B, et al. Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of Q690D high strength steel H-section beam-columns about strong axis [J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 189: 157-173.
    [7] HAI L T, LI G Q, WANG Y B, et al. Hysteretic model of Q690 high-strength steel beam-columns considering cyclic deterioration [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 172: 106158.
    [8] HAI L T, WANG Y B, LI G Q, et al. Numerical investigation on cyclic behavior of Q690 high strength steel beam-columns [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 167: 105814.
    [9] 宁克洋, 杨璐, 班慧勇, 等. 不锈钢焊接H形截面柱滞回性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(6): 215-222.NING K Y, YANG L, BAN H Y. Research on seismic behavior of stainless steel box-section column [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 53(4): 23-30, 49. (in Chinese)
    [10] 宁克洋, 杨璐, 班慧勇. 不锈钢箱形截面柱抗震性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(4): 23-30, 49.NING K Y, YANG L, BAN H Y. Research on seismic behavior of stainless steel box-section column [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(4): 23-30, 49. (in Chinese)
    [11] WANG Y B, LI G Q, CUI W, et al. Seismic behavior of high strength steel welded beam-column members [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 102: 245-255.
    [12] 高强钢结构设计标准: JGJ/T 483—2020 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.Standard for design of high strength stell structure: JGJ/T 483—2020 [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [13] 钢结构设计标准: GB 50017—2017 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.Code for design of steel structure: GB 50017—2017 [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
    [14] 建筑抗震试验规程: JGJ/T 101—2015 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.Specification for seismic test of buildings: JGJ/T 101—2015 [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015.(in Chinese)
    [15] 建筑抗震设计规范: GB 50011—2010 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.Code for seismic design of buildings:GB 50011—2010 [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
    [16] HWANG T H, SCRIBNER C F. R/C member cyclic response during various loadings [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1984, 110(3): 477-489.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

聂诗东,叶曦雨,王辉,李静尧,陈振业.低屈强比高强钢箱形柱抗震性能试验研究[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2023,45(6):29-37. NIE Shidong, YE Xiyu, WANG Hui, LI Jingyao, CHEN Zhenye. Experimental analysis on seismic behavior of low yield ratio high strength steel box-section column[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2023,45(6):29-37.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2023.031

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:425
  • 下载次数: 628
  • HTML阅读次数: 69
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-19
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-13
文章二维码