粉细砂地层双线盾构施工实测地表沉降规律分析与预测
作者:
作者单位:

1.东南大学 交通学院,南京 211189;2.中交隧道工程局有限公司南京分公司,南京 210000

作者简介:

廖赵胜(1997- ),男,主要从事盾构施工对周围环境影响研究,E-mail:220193199@seu.edu.cn。
LIAO Zhaosheng (1997- ), main research interest: influence of tunnel excavation on surrounding environment, E-mail: 220193199@seu.edu.cn.

通讯作者:

丁建文(通信作者),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:jwding@seu.edu.cn。

中图分类号:

U455.7

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51978159);中交隧道工程局有限公司项目(X-GD-SNJGS(S)-JIS-NT02-09-QT-21)


Investigation of surface settlement induced by twin shield tunelling in silty fine sand stratum
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, P. R. China;2.CCCC Tunnel Engineering Company Limited, Nanjing 210000, P. R. China

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978159); CCCC Tunnel Engineering Company Limited (No. X-GD-SNJGS(S)-JIS-NT02-09-QT-21)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    依托南通地铁二号线某区间盾构隧道施工,针对盾构穿越典型粉细砂地层条件,对双线盾构隧道施工引起的地表沉降开展现场测试和规律分析,对经典Peck公式在南通地区粉细砂地层中双线盾构施工的适用性进行探讨,并研究先行线和后行线土体损失率和地表沉降槽宽度系数的取值及影响因素。研究结果表明,在粉细砂地层中,后行线隧道施工对地层的二次扰动效应会引起先行线轴线上方地表沉降的显著增加,且二次扰动效应明显强于其他软土地层,但弱于砂土地层;相较于淤泥质土地层,在粉细砂地层中盾构停机对地表沉降的影响更为显著;先行线和后行线施工引起土体损失率比值η1/η2在1~5倍范围内,平均值为2.3,先行线和后行线地表沉降槽宽度系数比值K1/K2在1~2倍范围内,平均值为1.4;砂土、粉细砂和粉土地层中土体损失率比值η1/η2均大于1,η1/η2K1/K2与隧道覆土深度比(H/D)相关性较弱。

    Abstract:

    Field tests were carried out to observe surface settlement induced by twin shield construction in silty fine sand stratum, based on the project of Nantong Metro line 2. The applicability of the twin peck formula for silty fine sand stratum is examined through measured data. The ground loss rate, the width of the preceding tunnel and the rear tunnel were analyzed. The results show that in silty fine sand soil, the secondary perturbation effect of tunnel construction on the rear tunnel induces a significant increase in surface settlement above the axis of the preceding tunnel. The secondary perturbation effect in silty fine sand stratum is more obvious than that in other soft soil layers, but less than that for sand layer. Compared with silty soil layer, the impact of shield stoppage on ground settlement is more significant in silty fine sand stratum. The ratio of ground loss rate η1/η2 caused by the twin shield construction ranges from 1 to 5 with a mean value of 2.3, and the ratio of the surface settlement trough width parameter K1/K2 between the leading tunnel and the trailing tunnel ranges from 1 to 2 with a mean value of 1.4; The ratios of ground loss rate η1/η2 in sand, silty fine sand, and silt soil stratums all exceed 1. Furthermore, none obvious relationship can be found between ratios of ground loss rate η1/η2, width parameter K1/K2 and the ratio of cover depth to diameter (H/D).

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

廖赵胜,相龙胜,高顺宇,丁建文,刘慧刚.粉细砂地层双线盾构施工实测地表沉降规律分析与预测[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2024,46(2):79-88. LIAO Zhaosheng, XIANG Longsheng, GAO Shunyu, DING Jianwen, LIU Huigang. Investigation of surface settlement induced by twin shield tunelling in silty fine sand stratum[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2024,46(2):79-88.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2021.249

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-08
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-20
  • 出版日期: