EPS垫层及轻量填土挡墙的墙后土压力及其减载效应
作者:
作者单位:

1.三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌443002;2.宜昌富强工程有限责任公司, 湖北 宜昌443000

作者简介:

许晓亮(1989- ),男,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程可靠性分析及库岸边坡灾害防治研究,E-mial:sichuan106@ctgu.edu.cn。
XU Xiaoliang (1989- ), PhD, associate professor, main research interests: reliability analysis of geotechnical engineering and disaster prevention and control of reservoir bank slope, E-mail: sichuan106@ctgu.edu.cn.

通讯作者:

乔素云(通信作者),男,正高级工程师,E-mial:1357249766@qq.com。

中图分类号:

TU432

基金项目:

湖北省自然科学基金创新群体项目(2020CFA049);湖北省交通运输厅科研项目(2022-11-6-4)


Lateral earth pressure and load-reducing effect behind retaining wall with EPS cushion and light-weight soil
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering & Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang443002, Hubei, P. R. China;2.Yichang Fuqiang Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Yichang44300, Hubei, P. R. China

Fund Project:

Innovative Group Project of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2020CFA049); Scientific Research Project of Department of Transport of Hubei Province (No. 2022-11-6-4)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [3]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    挡墙后铺设柔性垫层或回填轻量土,对其优化设计和降低成本有着重要的工程意义。通过开展不同级别荷载下的挡土墙物理模型试验,分析墙后铺设EPS柔性垫层、回填泡沫轻量土及二者同时施加时的墙后土压力大小及分布特征,并探讨相应的减载效应。结果表明:挡土墙铺设柔性垫层、回填轻量土或二者同时施加时,墙后土压力均随埋深呈先增大后减小的“鼓肚”状非线性特征,土压力最大值多出现在1/2墙高处;同等荷载作用下,仅回填轻量土的减载效果相对较弱,减载率为10%~25%,而铺设柔性垫层的最大减载率较之提高了1.5倍,当二者同时施加时,减载效果最佳,最大减载率相应提高了近3倍;柔性垫层减载效果随着厚度的增加逐渐降低,但泡沫掺量对墙后回填轻量土的减载率影响更为敏感。工程中可考虑采用中等厚度的垫层,若墙后填土附加荷载较大,可适当提高回填泡沫轻量土的掺量。

    Abstract:

    Laying a flexible cushion or backfilling lightweight soil behind the retaining wall has important engineering significance for its optimized design and cost reduction. By carrying out model tests of retaining walls under different level of loads, the magnitude and distribution characteristics of the lateral earth pressure when laying EPS flexible cushion, backfilling lightweight soil and applying it simultaneously are analyzed, and the load-reducing effect is discussed. The result shows: when the retaining wall is paved with flexible cushion, backfilled with lightweight soil, or both applied, the lateral earth pressure exhibits a “bulging” nonlinear feature that increases first and then decreases with the burial depth, and the maximum value of earth pressure generally appears at half of the wall height; under the same loading, the load-reducing effect of backfilling lightweight soil is relatively weak, achieving a reduction rate of 10%-25%, the maximum load-reducing rate of laying a flexible cushion is increased by 1.5 times compared with lightweight soil, when both are applied, the load-reducing effect is the most significant, and the maximum load-reducing rate is increased by nearly 3 times; the load-reducing effect of the flexible cushion decreases with the variation of thickness, the foam content is more sensitive to the load-reducing rate of the backfill lightweight soil. In the engineering project, a medium-thickness cushion is an optimal choice, if the applied load of the backfill is large, the content of the backfill lightweight soil can be appropriately increased.

    参考文献
    [1] 张颖钧. 裂土挡土墙模型试验缓冲层设置的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1995, 17(1): 38-45.ZHANG Y J. Study on the buffering cushion installed in retaining wall model test with expansive soil as backfill [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 17(1): 38-45. (in Chinese)
    [2] 徐光黎, 杨银湖. 轻量土及其在工程中的应用[J]. 地质科技情报, 2005, 24(4): 94-98.XU G L, YANG Y H. Light-weight soils and their applications [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2005, 24(4): 94-98. (in Chinese)
    [3] 顾欢达, 顾熙. 塑料发泡颗粒轻质填土的土压力计算[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2008, 34(5): 93-98.GU H D, GU X. The calculation of earth pressure of foamed beads light soil by slice method [J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2008, 34(5): 93-98. (in Chinese)
    [4] 董金梅, 刘汉龙, 高玉峰, 等. 聚苯乙烯轻质混合土抗压强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(12): 1964-1968.DONG J M, LIU H L, GAO Y F, et al. Study on compressive strength properties of light heterogeneous soil mixed with expanded polystyrene [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(12): 1964-1968. (in Chinese)
    [5] 李明东, 朱伟, 马殿光, 等. EPS颗粒混合轻质土的施工技术及其应用实例[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(4): 533-536.LI M D, ZHU W, MA D G, et al. Construction technology and application in situ of expanded polystyrene treated lightweight soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(4): 533-536. (in Chinese)
    [6] 王超, 高洪梅, 王志华, 等. EPS混合土处理桥台软土地基模型试验[J]. 南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6): 118-123.WANG C, GAO H M, WANG Z H, et al. Model test of abutment on soft soil retaining EPS composite soil [J]. Journal of Nanjing Tech University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 39(6): 118-123. (in Chinese)
    [7] KANEDA K, HAZARIKA H, YAMAZAKI H. Examination of earth pressure reduction mechanism using tire-chip inclusion in sandy backfill via numerical simulation [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2018, 58(5): 1272-1281.
    [8] 高洪梅, 纪展鹏, 徐琪尔, 等. 基于直接位移的回填EPS混合土挡墙抗震设计方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2021, 41(5): 13-21.GAO H M, JI Z P, XU Q E, et al. Seismic design method of retaining wall filled with EPS lightweight soil based on direct displacement [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2021, 41(5): 13-21. (in Chinese)
    [9] 高洪梅, 卜春尧, 王志华, 等. 回填EPS混合土的防滑悬臂式挡墙地震稳定性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(12): 2278-2286.GAO H M, BU C Y, WANG Z H, et al. Seismic stability of anti-sliding cantilever retaining wall with EPS composite soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(12): 2278-2286. (in Chinese)
    [10] GAO H M, CHEN Y M, LIU H L, et al. Creep behavior of EPS composite soil [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 55(11): 3070-3080.
    [11] 侯天顺. 淤泥发泡颗粒混合轻量土力学性质的试验研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2008.HOU T S. Experimental study on mechanical properties of foamed particle light weight soil mixed with silt [D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2008. (in Chinese)
    [12] 侯天顺, 杨凯旋. 挡土墙后EPS颗粒混合轻量土填料静止土压力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3249-3259, 3270.HOU T S, YANG K X. Model test on earth pressure at rest of light weight soil mixed with EPS particles behind a retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3249-3259, 3270. (in Chinese)
    [13] HOU T S. Influence of expanded polystyrene size on deformation characteristics of light weight soil [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(11): 3320-3328.
    [14] ROY N, BHARTI S D, KUMAR A. Seismic isolation of tunnels in blocky rock mass using expanded polystyrene (EPS) Geofoam [J]. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2019, 4(1): 1-17.
    [15] NI P P, MEI G X, ZHAO Y L. Displacement-dependent earth pressures on rigid retaining walls with compressible geofoam inclusions: Physical modeling and analytical solutions [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(6): 1-13.
    [16] BATHURST R J, ZARNANI S. Earthquake load attenuation using EPS geofoam buffers in rigid wall applications [J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 43(4): 283-291.
    [17] 王德玲, 沈疆海. 挡土墙振动台试验的EPS压缩变形数值模拟比较[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版)理工卷, 2010, 7(3): 140-142.WANG D L, SHEN J H. Comparison of EPS compression deformation numerical simulation for retaining wall shaking table test [J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition) Sci & Eng, 2010, 7(3): 140-142. (in Chinese)
    [18] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 等. 挡土墙后EPS板减压性能模型试验研究[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2020, 42(4): 1-9.ZHENG J J, SHAO A D, XIE M X, et al. Model test study on decompression performance of EPS boards behind retaining walls [J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 42(4): 1-9. (in Chinese)
    [19] 郑俊杰, 景丹, 谢明星, 等. 刚性挡土墙后设置EPS垫层的设计方法研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(12): 96-101.ZHENG J J, JING D, XIE M X, et al. Study on design scheme of installing EPS cushion behind the rigid retaining wall [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(12): 96-101. (in Chinese)
    [20] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 等. 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.ZHENG J J, SHAO A D, XIE M X, et al. Experimental study on retaining wall with EPS cushion under different backfill widths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 324-332. (in Chinese)
    [21] 土工试验方法标准: GB/T 50123—2019 [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.Standard for geotechnical testing method: GB/T 50123—2019 [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [22] 朱伟, 姬凤玲, 马殿光, 等. 疏浚淤泥泡沫塑料颗粒轻质混合土的抗剪强度特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(Sup2): 5721-5726.ZHU W, JI F L, MA D G, et al. Shear strength properties of lightweight bead-treated soil made from dredged silt [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(Sup2): 5721-5726. (in Chinese)
    [23] 公路桥涵设计通用规范: JTG D60—2015 [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015.General code for desigh of highway bridges and culverts: JTG D60—2015 [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [24] 陈页开. 挡土墙上土压力的试验研究与数值分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2001.CHEN Y K. Model test and numerical analysis of earth pressures on retaining wall [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2001. (in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

许晓亮,王鑫佩,曾林风,张庭风,乔素云.含EPS垫层及轻量填土挡墙的墙后土压力及其减载效应[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2025,47(1):54-62. XU Xiaoliang, WANG Xinpei, ZENG Linfeng, ZHANG Tingfeng, QIAO Suyun. Lateral earth pressure and load-reducing effect behind retaining wall with EPS cushion and light-weight soil[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2025,47(1):54-62.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2022.116

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:147
  • 下载次数: 91
  • HTML阅读次数: 42
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-20
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-18
文章二维码