加筋土桥台柔性复合结构设计方法研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.太原理工大学土木工程学院;2.武汉大学土木建筑工程学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU431; U455.7

基金项目:

国家自然科学(52008285, 52178341), 山西交通控股集团有限公司科技项目(18-JKKJ-23)


Study on Design Method of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge System
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering,Taiyuan University of Technology;2.School of Civil Engineering,Wuhan University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    加筋土桥台柔性复合结构(简称“GRS-IBS”)作为加筋土的一种改进技术,可有效控制路-桥过渡段差异沉降以减少“桥头跳车”现象的发生。但由于其设计方法仍不完善,目前GRS-IBS结构多参照加筋土挡墙进行设计。本文基于山西省晋城市太行一号风景道K43+175处工程背景,借鉴国内外相关规范或标准开展GRS-IBS结构设计,并采用FLAC3D建立有限差分数值模型进行数值模拟,分别对桥台变形、筋材和墙面板受力状况进行分析验算以保证设计方法的合理性和工程结构安全。研究结果表明:由于与传统加筋土挡墙在结构形式和承载方式上的差异,GRS-IBS结构设计除需进行结构内部和外部稳定性验算外,还需采用FHWA提供的计算公式对结构承载力进行验算,筋材拉力验算同样建议采用FHWA推荐的计算公式;采用现浇混凝土墙面板的GRS-IBS结构能够满足相关规范中对路桥过渡段不均匀沉降控制的技术要求,但为保证工程结构安全,需对墙面板顶部进行局部加强设计;GRS-IBS结构墙面板最大拉应力位于桥台中部偏下位置,建议在现浇混凝土墙面板受拉一侧配置一定数量的钢筋分担部分拉应力,以避免墙面板混凝土材料的开裂破坏。

    Abstract:

    As an improved technology of reinforced soil, the geosynthetic reinforced soil-integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS) could reduce the differential settlement between the abutment and the bridge approach embankment to avoid "bridgehead bump " effectively. However, the design approach of GRS-IBS has not yet been comprehensive that it could only refer to the similar geotechnical structure such as the reinforced retaining wall so far. Considering this, relying on the demonstration project of GRS-IBS in Taihang No.1 Tourism Road K43+175 in Jincheng City, Shanxi Province, a project design was presented referring to the domestic and foreign relevant specifications, and a numerical model at the same condition was also established using FLAC3D to analyze the abutment deformation, the geogrid tensile force and the panel stress respectively to confirm the rationality of design method as well as the structural safety. The results show that not only the internal and external stability of GRS-IBS should be calculated, but also the bearing capacity should be checked using the formula recommended by FHWA because of the differences with the traditional reinforced retaining wall in both the structural form and the bearing mode, and the geogrid tensile force should also be calculated using the formula recommended by FHWA; the GRS-IBS structure with cast-in-place concrete panel could meet the requirement for the differential settlement between the abutment and the bridge approach embankment in relevant specifications, but the top of the panel should be strengthened locally to ensure the safety of engineering structure; the maximum tensile stress of the panel of GRS-IBS was located in its lower part, and it was suggested that a certain amount of reinforcement was necessary to share the tensile stress on the tension side of the panel to avoid cracking.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-07
  • 最后修改日期:2022-06-21
  • 录用日期:2022-06-22
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: