大断面隧道原位扩挖围岩力学特征试验研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中电建路桥集团有限公司;2.中电建(广东)中开高速公路有限公司;3.北京科技大学土木与资源工程学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(52278326);国家高层次人才计划(SQ2022QB03353);北京市杰出青年科学基金项目(JQ21028);中电建路桥集团有限公司科技项目(LQKY2021-01)


Study on the Mechanical Response Characteristics of Surrounding Rock during In-Situ Excavation of Large-Section Tunnel
Author:
Affiliation:

1.China Power Construction Road and Bridge Group Co., LTD;2.China Power Construction (Guangdong) Zhongkai Highway Co., LTD;3.School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278326); National Youth Talent Support Program of China (SQ2022QB03353); Beijing Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project (Grant No. JQ21028); Science and Technology Program of Power China Road Bridge Group CO.,Ltd (KY2021-01)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    大断面公路隧道原位扩挖过程围岩扰动大,施工风险高,然而,对于隧道原位扩挖围岩力学特征的研究尚不深入。本文基于物理模型试验和围岩应力简化模型,研究了不同隧道扩挖工法下围岩的力学特征。隧道扩挖物理模型试验结果表明,单侧毛洞扩挖法的位移量变化最大,单侧台阶扩挖法的围岩压力聚集在拱肩,单侧CD扩挖法的位移量最小且围岩压力分布更均匀;围岩应力简化模型分析得出,拱脚的位移量大于拱顶,围岩的损伤程度越大,位移量越大;工程实测结果显示,模型试验中的围岩压力和位移量的试验值与实测值高度匹配,其位移变化过程也呈现出相同趋势,当损伤系数D为0.2时,两种扩挖工法下的模型值能够全面反映实测值,单侧CD扩挖法更有利于围岩的长期稳定,研究结果可为同类大断面隧道扩挖施工提供理论依据。

    Abstract:

    The in-situ excavation process of large-section highway tunnels causes significant disturbance to the surrounding rock and poses high construction risks. However, research on the mechanical characteristics of the surrounding rock during in-situ excavation of tunnels is still limited. This paper investigates the mechanical characteristics of surrounding rock under different excavation methods using physical model experiments and a simplified stress model. The results of the tunnel excavation physical model test show that the displacement variation is the largest in the single-sided borehole excavation method, the surrounding rock pressure accumulates at the arch shoulder in the single-sided step excavation method, and the displacement is the smallest with a more uniform surrounding rock pressure distribution in the single-sided CD excavation method. The simplified model analysis of surrounding rock stress indicates that the displacement at the arch foot is larger than at the crown, and the greater the damage degree of the surrounding rock, the larger the displacement. Field measurements confirm that model test values of rock pressure and displacement align closely with measured values, showing similar displacement trends. When the damage coefficient D is 0.2, model values under both methods accurately reflect the measurements. Moreover, the single-sided CD method is more favorable for long-term rock stability. These findings provide theoretical guidance for similar large-section tunnel projects.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-27
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-03
  • 录用日期:2025-03-05
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码