网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Fluid flow and mass transport properties in geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste considering fracture networks  PDF

  • MA Guowei
  • XU Man
  • CHEN Yun
  • LI Tuo
  • WANG Huidong
School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, P. R. China

CLC: TU452

Updated:2023-03-07

DOI:10.11835/j.issn.2096-6717.2021.271

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

Fractures significantly influence fluid flow and mass transport in projects of radioactive waste disposal in deep geological formations. This work investigated the mechanism of nuclide migration in fractured rocks by considering fracture roughness based on a unified pipe-network method (UPM). The processes of adsorption and decay were incorporated into the UPM framework to capture the nuclide migration in a rock mass with rough-walled fracture networks. Benchmark tests were attempted against analytical results of the concentration distribution along a single fracture. An equivalent method to approach the hydraulic fracture aperture in fractured rocks by considering fracture roughness was also demonstrated. The influences of the fracture-roughness distribution, the rock matrix adsorption capacity and the transport properties on the process of nuclide migration were investigated. The results show that the breakthrough curve for the nuclide migration moved toward a longer time with increasing fracture roughness. The increased diffusion coefficient and retardation factor in the rock matrix greatly enhanced the matrix retardation effect on nuclide migration. Furthermore, the nuclide featured longer half-life results in a higher relative nuclide concentration of the domain. A hydraulic gradient with a relatively low value greatly impacted the relative concentration's distribution.

1 Introduction

As a clean energy source, nuclear energy provides an excellent way for optimizing the energy structure and promoting sustainable development. However, the high-level radioactive waste that is produced by nuclear energy generation is one of the main factors that restrict the nuclear industry's development. In projects of radioactive waste disposal in deep geological formations, the natural fracture network is a remarkable feature and has complex geometries and properties. Furthermore, numerous fractures with varying sizes are also created in the rock surrounding the disposal repository because of excavation blasting or earthquakes[

1-3]. Since the permeability of fracture is larger than that of the rock mass matrix, fractures play a key role in fluid flow and nuclide migration (deep underground) and threaten the safe disposal of radioactive waste.

An idealized single-fracture model is commonly used to study the mechanism of fluid flow and mass transport in fractured porous media. A cubic law was derived by regarding the single fracture as two smooth, straight, and infinite parallel plates. On this basis, the fluid flow and mass transport in both single fractures and in fracture networks were analyzed[

4-7]. However, natural fractures feature rough-walled properties with varying apertures and complex geometries. The assumption of parallel plates ignores the fracture roughness and the tortuous flow path, thereby overestimating the fracture's velocity, which are not valid for fluid flow in a more realistic fracture[8-11]. Rasouli et al.[12] established a relationship between hydraulic aperture and mechanical aperture by incorporating the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) of rough-walled fractures. The applicability of the correlation was suggested by comparison to the fluid-flow test results of nine actual fractures in granite rocks. Zhang et al.[10] improved the seepage model in a single rough-walled fracture by considering the parameters of tortuosity and the joint roughness coefficient. The reliability of the updated flow prediction model, compared with the previous modified model that only considered one factor, was demonstrated by evaluating the flow patterns in four rough-walled fractures. In addition to JRC, the parameter Z2 and fractal dimension D were also commonly used to quantitatively evaluate the fracture roughness. Li et al. [13] directly solved the Navier-Stokes equation to simulate fluid flow in a series of two-dimensional fracture models with a different fracture roughness (Z2 is from 0 to 0.5). It was found that the hydraulic aperture was inversely proportional to Z2. Dimadis et al.[14] proposed a correction model for the hydraulic aperture related to Z2. The feasibility of this model was demonstrated by comparing flow velocities obtained from seepage tests. Luo et al.[15] established an equivalent permeability model using fractal dimensions to evaluate the influence of fracture roughness on the flow patterns. The fracture permeability measured by the seepage test proved the accuracy of the proposed model, which was then used in the study of coalbed methane storage and transportation.

Nuclide migration is an extremely complex process involving: convection of solute along fractures and diffusion in the matrix, mechanical dispersion of solute in fractures, adsorption by the matrix, and radioactive decay of nuclides[

16]. Numerous efforts have been devoted to finding corresponding analytical solutions to investigate the mechanisms of these complex processes[17-20]. However, although analytical solutions have high accuracy, they are difficult to apply when solving complex practical problems, because they use oversimplified models. Numerical methods are powerful tools for approaching fluid flow and mass transport in rock masses with complex fracture networks. Continuum-based models can be applied to investigate the multi-physical coupled process in fractured rocks. Tsang et al.[21] used a single-porosity model to represent fractured porous media as a single random continuum and simulated the three-dimensional transmission of point tracers at hundreds of locations in the medium. The resultant statistical distributions of transport parameters quantified the uncertainty in predicting flow and mass transport based on a limited amount of field data. A dual-porosity model indicated that the fractured rock mass was a unit composed of a fracture system with poor porosity and strong water conductivity, a pore system with good porosity and weak water conductivity. Suresh et al.[22] used the dual-porosity model to comprehensively consider the permeability of both the fracture and the rock matrix and simulated the fluid flow and mass transport in a coupled fracture-matrix system. The effects of matrix diffusion and dispersion on the concentration distribution in a typical dual-porosity system were discussed in detail. Yan et al.[23] proposed a general multiporosity model to simulate the process of seepage and mass transport in fractured rock masses with more than two porosity systems. The multiporosity model was then extended to analyze the contaminant migration behavior of porous fractured aquifers in sandstone formations[24]. It was demonstrated that a detailed description of the heterogeneous fractured aquifer was necessary to understand and simulate the distribution of pollutant concentrations.

However, continuum-based models homogenize the fracture properties, such as fracture permeability and diffusion coefficient, into the rock matrix. The discontinuity and complex geometries of the fracture are neglected, which greatly impacts the local distributions of pressure and concentration in fractured rocks[

25]. Discontinuum-based models explicitly consider the distribution of fractures and their effect on the processes of fluid flow and mass transport and well describe the anisotropy of the multi-physical coupled process in a fractured rock[26]. Blessent et al.[27] employed three-dimensional and two-dimensional elements to represent the rock matrix and fractures, respectively, for the simulation of groundwater flow and pollutant transmission in fractured rocks. Verification was performed by combining the geological model and the numerical technique. Hyman et al.[28] proposed a scheme to solve the flow and mass transport in three-dimensional fracture networks. The detailed geometry of fractures was simplified, and the connected pipe networks representing the discrete fracture network (DFN) topology were retained. Sherman et al.[29] simulated the solute transport process in a fractured rock mass based on a DFN model. The particle tracking method was used to analyze the influence of different cross-mixing rules on the transport properties in a three-dimensional discrete fracture network system. Li et al.[30] used the finite element method to simulate fluid flow and solute transport in both a rock matrix and fractures. The main factors that affect the solute concentration distribution in the fracture network were investigated, and strategies for the design of radioactive waste repositories were proposed. A unified pipe-network method (UPM) was developed to investigate the coupled processes of fluid flow, mass transport, and chemical reaction in complex fracture networks[31]. The UPM was further extended to capture the mechanism of nuclide migration in highly fractured rocks by incorporating the effects of chemical convection and dispersion. The influences of the radioactive material’s half-life, the fracture length and aperture, and the geometric fracture configuration on the transport of radioactive contaminants in fracture networks were numerically analyzed[32]. Fractures with complex geometries greatly impact the concentration distribution in fractured rocks, and the presence of adsorption and radioactive decay also affect nuclide migration in the formation[33]. A more comprehensive model based on UPM, therefore, must be developed to capture the mechanism of nuclide migration in fractured rocks.

The main contribution of this study was the investigation of the mechanism of nuclide migration in fractured rocks by considering fracture roughness based on the unified pipe-network method. The processes of adsorption, decay and dispersion were incorporated into the UPM framework to capture the nuclide migration in a rock mass with rough-walled fracture networks. Firstly, mathematical models and the discrete process of UPM were introduced. Benchmark tests against analytical results of the concentration distribution along a single fracture were then attempted to verify the numerical model. An equivalent model that representing a rough-walled fracture aperture was incorporated into the UPM framework, and the influences of fracture roughness distribution, the rock matrix adsorption capacity, and the transport properties on the process of nuclide migration were investigated. Finally, conclusions were drawn, and limitations were discussed.

2 Mathematical model and numerical method

2.1 Governing equations

It is assumed that mass transport in rock fractures is mainly controlled by convection and dispersion, and the governing equation for an incompressible diluted solution is expressed as follows[

31]

(φξCξ)t=φξDξCξ-vξCξ (1)

where the superscript ξ is the medium type (i.e., ξ=m is rock matrix, ξ=f is fracture); φ is the porosity; C is the solute concentration, mol/L; v is the fluid velocity, m/s; D is the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient, m2/s; and t is the time variable, s. The left side of the equation is the time-varying term. The first term on the right side of the equation is the dispersion term, representing the molecular diffusion and mechanical dispersion in the process of mass transport. The second term on the right side of the equation is the convection term, which is related to the fluid flow velocity.

The migration of nuclides in a fractured rock is controlled by many physical and chemical processes. In addition to the convection and dispersion described above, the adsorption and reaction of the delayed effect should also be incorporated to capture the process of nuclide migration. Therefore, Eq. (1) can be rewritten as[

32]

Rξ(φξCξ)t=φξDξCξ-vξCξ-λRξφξCξ (2)

where R is the retardation factor; λ is the decay constant, 1/s. The effects of adsorption on the fracture surface and the rock matrix are represented by retardation factors, which yields[

32]

Rf=1+Kfb (3)
Rm=1+Km (4)

where Kf is the distribution coefficient of the fracture, m, defined as the mass of solute adsorbed in unit volume of rock matrix divided by solution concentration; Km is the distribution coefficient in the rock matrix, defined as the mass of solute adsorbed in unit volume of rock matrix divided by solution concentration[

34]; b is half of the fracture aperture. The relationship between the decay constant λ and the half-life t1/2 is written as[35]

λ=ln 2t1/2 (5)

2.2 Unified pipe-network method

Comparing with the finite element method (FEM), the unified pipe-network method had merit in satisfying the mass conservation by obtaining the pressure and concentration field, achieving numerical stability and convergence in the condition with a large Péclet number. Therefore, this method was used in this work to investigate the mechanism of nuclide migration in fractured rocks. In UPM, fractures and the rock matrix in a fractured model were discretized as triangular elements and line elements, respectively. A pipe-equivalent method was used to obtain the pipes for the process of fluid flow and mass transport in each element. Both fracture pipes and rock matrix pipes were then combined to generate a pipe network system[

32]. A two-dimensional fractured rock is shown in Fig.1(a). The bold red line represented a fracture, and the remainder was the rock matrix. Fig.1(b) shows a triangular element abc of the rock matrix obtained from the fractured model in Fig.1(a). The point o was the circumcentre of Δabc; oi, oj and ok were the vertical lines from the circumcenter to each side of the triangle. Based on pipe equivalence, ab, bc, and ac were equivalent to matrix pipes. Specifically, the process of fluid flow between region oibj and region ojck was equivalent to the flow in matrix pipe bc, and the flow rate was recorded as Qoj. Similarly, the flow between region ojck and region okai were equivalent to the fluid flow in matrix pipe ca, and the flow between region okai and region oibj was equivalent to the fluid flow in matrix pipe ab. Fig.1(c) shows a fracture pipe bc, and the flow rate in the pipe was Qbc. The matrix pipe and the fracture pipe were combined, based on the superposition principle, and thus, the total flow rate at the fracture-matrix interface could be obtained as Qoj+Qbc, as shown in Fig.1(d). The process of fluid flow and mass transport was finally solved using an implicit time scheme. A detailed derivation of the discrete form based on UPM can be found in references [31-32].

(a)  A discretized model for a fractured rock

(b)  Pipe equivalence in matrix element

(c)  Pipe equivalence in fracture element

(d)  Combination of matrix pipe and fracture pipe

Fig. 1  Discretization of unified pipe-network method

3 Fluid flow and mass transport in a single-fractured rock

3.1 Model verification

A fractured rock model embedded with a horizontal fracture is shown in Fig. 2. The fractured model with dimensions of 5 m (x) × 2 m (y) was meshed with 1 918 elements and 1 015 nodes.

Fig. 2  Mesh generation for a fractured rock model

The upper and lower boundaries of the area were impervious. The solute was injected into the fracture at a constant concentration from the left side, and the fluid freely flowed out at the right end. The velocity of fluid in the fracture was 0.01 m/d. The initial boundary was expressed as C(x,0)=0. The simulation parameters for the process of fluid flow and mass transport are shown in Table 1.

Table 1  Simulation parameters for model verification
ParametersSymbolsValuesUnits
Fluid density ρf 1 000 kg/m3
Fracture aperture b 1×10-3 m
Fracture porosity φf 1
Matrix porosity φm 0.2
Matrix permeability km 1×10-15 m2
Fracture diffusion coefficient Df 5.9×10-8 m2/s
Matrix diffusion coefficient Dm 1.6×10-10 m2/s
Retardation coefficient in matrix Rm 1.27
Retardation coefficient in fracture Rf 1.5
Decay constant of nuclide λ 1.78×10-9 s-1

The numerical model was verified by comparison with the analytical solution for the concentration evolution in a single fracture with constant aperture. In a single-fractured model that considers the processes of convection and diffusion, the analytical solution of mass transport in the fracture can be expressed as[

18]

CC0=erfctwbDeDa/2(t-tw) (6)

where c0 is the source comcentration at the inlet, mol/L; tw is the water residence time, s; t is the solute transport time, s; De is the effective diffusion coefficient, m2/s, and Da is the apparent diffusion coefficient, m2/s.

The relative concentration distribution curves along the single fracture at different times (200, 2 000 and 10 000 d) are displayed in Fig.3. The concentration in the fracture was negatively correlated with the migration distance, and the concentration at the same position increased with increasing simulation time. Good agreement was achieved between the results obtained from the UPM and the analytical solutions.

Fig. 3  Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for the processes of convection and diffusion in asingle-fractured model

If the adsorption and reaction of the delayed effect are incorporated in the process of mass transport, the analytical solution can be expressed as[

17]

CC0=expv-v2+ψDf1/2x (7)

Fig.4 shows the relative concentration distri-bution curves along the single fracture at 200, 2 000 and 10 000 d. The concentration of nuclides in the fracture decreased with increasing migration distance. The nuclide migration speed, considering the effect of adsorption and decay, significantly decreased. The results obtained from the numerical model were consistent with the analytical solutions, which indicated the reliability of the UPM in the simulation of chemical convection, diffusion, adsorption and decay in a fractured model.

Fig. 4  Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions considering the processes of convection, diffusion, adsorption and decay in a single-fractured model

3.2 Fracture roughness characterization and equivalent hydraulic aperture

The joint roughness coefficient (JRC), fractal dimension (D), and parameter Z2 are widely used in rock mechanics to quantitatively evaluate fracture roughness. The parameter Z2, which is conceptually clear and computationally simple, represents the fracture roughness in a two-dimensional rock mass in this study[

36].

z2=1Lzi-1-zixi-1-xi2xi-1-xi1/2 (8)

where xi and zi are the coordinates of the fracture surface profile, m; L is the fracture length, m. The correlations between JRC and Z2 can be found based on the analysis of Barton's standard profile curve[

37].

Mathematical and empirical models have been proposed to connect hydraulic apertures with mechanical apertures[

12-13, 38-39]. The established correlation between these apertures and Z2 is employed[40].

e=E1+Z22.25 (9)

where e is the hydraulic aperture, m; E is the mechanical aperture, m. The above correlation is applicable to fluid flow with a Reynolds number less than 1.

SynFrac[

41-42] was used to generate the rough-walled fracture embedded in a rock mass, as shown in Fig. 5. The fracture aperture followed a normal distribution with a mean value of 0.1 mm. The parameter Z2 of this rough-walled fracture was 0.3, as obtained from Eq. (8). Thus, the equivalent hydraulic aperture could be calculated as 0.094 mm by substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (9).

Fig. 5  A rough-walled fracture generated based on SynFrac

3.3 Transport properties in a single-fractured model

A rough-walled fracture with parameter Z2 of 0.3 and an average aperture of 0.1 mm was generated in a two-dimensional fractured model. A smooth-walled fracture with an equivalent hydraulic aperture of 0.094 mm was then obtained based on Eq. (9). The simulation parameters and boundary conditions can be found in Section 3.1. The simulated results indicated that the average flow rate in a rough-walled fracture was 3.46×10-13 m3/s, while the average flow rate in a smooth-walled fracture was 4.60×10-13 m3/s. The flow rate in a rough-walled fracture was 24.8% less than that in a smooth-walled fracture.

Breakthrough curves and relative concentration distribution curves were obtained and plotted in Fig.6. As shown in Fig. 6(a), the increase rate of nuclide concentration in the smooth-walled fracture was obviously faster than that of the rough-walled fracture. As shown in Fig. 6(b), it was indicated that the migration distance required for the smooth-walled fracture to reach the same relative concentration was longer than that required for the rough-walled fracture. Table 2 lists the time required to reach the identical relative concentration at outlets for the two models with different types of fractures. It was illustrated that 500 d was required for the smooth-walled fracture model to reach a relative concentration of 0.05, which was 1 600 d earlier than that for the rough-walled fracture model. The time difference between these two models to reach relative concentrations of 0.1 and 0.15 at the outlets was 2 800 d and 5 400 d, respectively, which indicated that the impact of fracture roughness was enhanced as the migration process continued. Therefore, the effect of fracture roughness should be considered in the investigation of nuclide migration in fractured rocks.

(a)  Breakthrough curves

(b)  The relative concentration along the x-direction after 10 000 days

Fig. 6  The evolution of relative nuclide concentration in a fractured rock with different fracture properties

Table 2  The time required for a single-fractured model to reach different relative concentrations
Fracture typeTime/days
0.05 C00.1 C00.15 C0
Rough-walled fracture 2 100 3 700 6 800
Smooth-walled fracture 500 900 1 400

4 Transportation of high-levelradioactive waste in rough-walled fracture networks

4.1 Description of the model

Two groups of fractures were randomly generated in the region of 50 m (x) × 50 m (y). The fracture dip angle in each group followed a normal distribution with mean values of 45° and 135°, respectively, and the variance was 5. The fracture length followed a normal distribution with an average value of 10 m and a variance of 6. The fracture aperture conformed to the normal distribution with an average value of 0.5 mm in the study of radioactive waste's deep geological disposal in fractured rocks. The total fracture number was 100 in the current simulation, and the model diagram is shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7  A rock model with fractured networks for nuclide migration

The hydraulic gradient was commonly distributed in the range of 0.008-0.016 based on previous investigations[

43]. The hydraulic gradient was assigned as J=0.01 in the current simulation. The fluid at the right end of the area freely flowed out, and the upper and lower parts were impermeable boundaries, as shown in Fig. 7. The solute was injected at a constant concentration along the x-direction from the left boundary and flowed out at x=50 m. Here, the nuclide Th-232 was employed to simulate a migration process in the fractured system. The simulation parameters are listed in Table 3.

Table 3  Simulation parameters for the fluid flow and mass transport in fracture network
ParametersSymbolsValuesUnits
Fluid density ρf 1 000 kg/m3
Average fracture aperture E 0.5 mm
Fracture porosity φf 1
Matrix porosity φm 0.2
Matrix permeability Km 1×10-15 m2
Fracture diffusion coefficient Df 8×10-5 m2/s
Matrix diffusion coefficient Dm 1.6×10-10 m2/s
Retardation coefficient in matrix Rm 1.27
Retardation coefficient in fracture Rf 1.5
Decay constant of nuclide λ 4.93×10-11 a-1

4.2 Effect of fracture roughness distributions on nuclide migration

The fracture roughness is determined by the aperture and tortuosity of a fracture. The process of nuclide migration in fracture networks with different roughness distributions was studied in this section. Each fracture in the fracture network system featured a specific fracture roughness. Cases with different distributions of fracture roughness (constant roughness, uniform distribution of roughness and normal distribution of roughness) were numerically simulated to investigate the effect of fracture roughness on the process of nuclide migration in rough-walled fracture networks. Two values of Z2 (Z2=0 and Z2=0.5) were assigned in cases with constant roughness. The fracture roughness in cases of uniform distribution and normal distribution were in the range of 0 and 0.5. An average value of 0.25 and a variance of 0.1 was assigned in the normal distribution case.

Breakthrough curves for the nuclide concentration along the exit of the domain in different cases related to fracture roughness are shown in Fig.8. The breakthrough curve moved towards a longer time with increasing Z2. The concentration at the outlet boundary decreased with increasing overall roughness. The breakthrough curve of the roughness uniform distribution model was close to that of the normal distribution model.

Fig. 8  Comparison of breakthrough curves of different distributions of roughness

4.3 Effect of rock matrix properties on nuclide migration

The water storage capacity of a fractured rock mass depends on microcracks or pores (rock matrix), while the water conductivity depends on larger fractures. Therefore, both fractures and the rock matrix were considered in the simulation of nuclide migration in fractured rocks. Two aspects related to the influence of the rock matrix on the processes of fluid flow and mass transport were investigated. The first was the diffusion coefficient of the matrix (Dm), and the second was the blocking factor of the matrix (Rm) when nuclides were adsorbed.

The influence of matrix diffusion on the process of nuclide migration in a fractured system was analyzed using four different diffusion coefficients: 0, 1.6×10-12, 1.6×10-11 and 1.6×10-10 m2/s. The breakthrough curves for different cases are plotted in Fig. 9. The average concentration of nuclides in the fractures at the outlet boundary tended to be stable after 300 a, and it decreased with increasing Dm. Fig.10 presents the distribution of nuclide concentration with different matrix diffusion coefficients. The concentration distribution at the outlet boundary indicated that the concentration of nuclides in the fractures decreased with increasing Dm. It has been demonstrated that enhanced matrix diffusion greatly slowed the process of nuclide migration and weakened the peak value of the breakthrough curve.

Fig. 9  Comparison of breakthrough curves of different Dm

(a)  Dm=0

(b)  Dm=1.6×10-12

(c)  Dm=1.6×10-11

(d)  Dm=1.6×10-10

Fig. 10  Distribution of nuclide in fracture network

Different Rm values were used to analyze the effect of adsorption on the processes of nuclide migration in fractured rocks, and the breakthrough curves are shown in Fig. 11. The relative concentration of nuclides at the outlet decreased with increasing Rm. The enhanced adsorption effect in the rock matrix extended the breakthrough time as the nuclide continuously migrated in the domain.

Fig. 11  Comparison of breakthrough curves of different Rm

4.4 Effects of decay on nuclide migration

The radioactive decay of nuclides also impacted the mass transport process in the domain. Nuclides, including Th-232, U-238 and Cs-135, which have large differences in half-lives (Table 4), were used to characterize the nuclide migration in fractured rocks. Fig. 12 illustrates the distribution of nuclide concentrations after 50 a. Th-232 diffused the fastest in the same domain compared with the other two nuclides.

Table 4  The half-lives and decay constants of different nuclides
NuclideHalf-life t1/2 /aDecay constant λ/a-1
Th-232 1.41×1010 4.93×10-11
U-238 4.50×109 1.54×10-10
Cs-135 2.30×106 3.01×10-7

(a)  Th-232

(b)  U-238

(c)  Cs-135

Fig. 12  Distribution of the concentration of different nuclides in a fractured rock

The relative concentrations of the three nuclides at the outlet of the fractured rock were calculated. The corresponding breakthrough curves and the relative concentrations along the x-direction are shown in Fig. 13.

(a)  Breakthrough curves

(b)  The relative concentration along the x-direction after 50 a

Fig. 13  The evolution of relative nuclide concentrations of different nuclides

The breakthrough curves in Fig. 13(a) indicated that the relative concentrations of all nuclides at the outlet boundary increase with time. The nuclide Cs-135, which has a shorter half-life, featured the lowest relative concentration at the outlet compared with the other two nuclides. The concentration built up at an exponential rate before 100 a and tended to be stable after 200 a. The time required to reach a stable state was longer for nuclides with longer half-life. Fig. 13(b) illustrates the relative concentrations of three nuclides migrating along the x-direction in the fractured domain after 50 a. The relative concentration in fractures decreased with increasing migration distance. The nuclide Cs-135 was characterized by a smaller half-life and presented a smaller migration distance. Correspondingly, the nuclide Th-232 had a longer half-life and tended to have a lower radiation intensity and a longer migration distance. The decay of a radionuclide emitted and transformed particles into other elements. A more active radiation reaction resulted in a faster decrease in the nuclide concentration and shorter penetration distance[

44]. Therefore, the nuclide's radioactive decay strongly impacted the distribution of the nuclide concentration in fractured rocks.

4.5 Effects of hydraulic gradient on nuclide migration

Different hydraulic gradients (0.008, 0.01, 0.012 and 0.015) were used to investigate nuclide migration in the fractured domain. The distributions of nuclide concentration after 50 a in the four cases are shown in Fig. 14.

(a)  J=0.008

(b)  J=0.010

(c)  J=0.012

(d)  J=0.015

Fig. 14  Distribution of nuclide concentration in different hydraulic gradients

The breakthrough curves in Fig. 15(a) indicated that the relative concentration at the outlet increased with increasing hydraulic gradient throughout the simulation. In addition, the relative concentration increased by 30.4% when the hydraulic gradient changed from 0.008 to 0.01 (increased by 25%). Nevertheless, the relative concentration only increased by 22.0% when the hydraulic gradient changed from 0.012 to 0.015 (increased by 25%). The results indicated that the concentration variation was greatly influenced by the hydraulic gradient when J was a relatively low value. Fig. 15(b) shows the relative concentration along the x-axis after 50 a with different hydraulic gradients. The maximum migration distance of the nuclide increased with increasing hydraulic gradient.

(a)  Breakthrough curves

(b)  The relative concentration along the x-directionafter 50 a

Fig. 15  The evolution of relative nuclide concentration considering different hydraulic gradients

5 Conclusion

This work was used to investigate the mechanism of nuclide migration in fractured rocks when considering fracture roughness based on UPM. The influences of the fracture roughness' distribution, the nuclide decay effect, the rock matrix adsorption capacity and the transport properties on the process of nuclide migration were investigated. The results showed that different distributions of roughness had an effect on the nuclide concentration in fractured rock and that the breakthrough curve moved toward a longer time with increasing Z2. However, the migration patterns between the case with the uniform distribution of Z2 were close to the case with the normal distribution of Z2. The increase of Dm and Rm in the rock matrix greatly enhanced the matrix retardation effect on nuclide migration. The half-life of the nuclide also greatly influenced the distribution of nuclide concentration in the fractured rock. A longer nuclide half-life led to a higher level of relative nuclide concentration in the domain. Furthermore, the hydraulic gradient greatly impacted the distribution of the relative concentration, especially when the hydraulic gradient was relatively low. The relative concentration increased by 30.4% when the hydraulic gradient changed from 0.008 to 0.01 (increased by 25%). Nevertheless, the relative concentration only increased by 22.0% when the hydraulic gradient changed from 0.012 to 0.015 (increased by 25%).

The current numerical model provided a theoretical basis for the optimization of high-level radioactive waste disposal in fractured rocks. However, improvements are still required in future work. A more realistic geological model should be established to perform safety assessments in the deep geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste based on field data. Furthermore, the influences of temperature and fracture filling on the process of nuclide migration should also be considered.

References

1

WANG X, QIN Y, YIN Z H, et al. Historical shear deformation of rock fractures derived from digital outcrop models and its implications on the development of fracture systems [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2019, 114: 122-130. [Baidu Scholar] 

2

FAN L F, GAO J W, DU X L, et al. Spatial gradient distributions of thermal shock-induced damage to granite [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 12(5): 917-926. [Baidu Scholar] 

3

FAN L F, YANG K C, WANG M, et al. Experimental study on wave propagation through granite after high-temperature treatment [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2021, 148: 104946. [Baidu Scholar] 

4

SISAVATH S, AL-YAARUBY A, PAIN C C, et al. A simple model for deviations from the cubic law for a fracture undergoing dilation or closure [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2003, 160(5/6): 1009-1022. [Baidu Scholar] 

5

KONZUK J S, KUEPER B H. Evaluation of cubic law based models describing single-phase flow through a rough-walled fracture [J]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40(2): W02402. [Baidu Scholar] 

6

BODIN J, POREL G, DELAY F, et al. Simulation and analysis of solute transport in 2D fracture/pipe networks: The SOLFRAC program [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2007, 89(1/2): 1-28. [Baidu Scholar] 

7

PENG H, ZHAO Z H, CHEN W, et al. Thermal effect on permeability in a single granite fracture: Experiment and theoretical model [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2020, 131: 104358. [Baidu Scholar] 

8

BRIGGS S, KARNEY B W, SLEEP B E. Numerical modelling of flow and transport in rough fractures [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 6(6): 535-545. [Baidu Scholar] 

9

WANG L C, CARDENAS M B, SLOTTKE D T, et al. Modification of the local cubic law of fracture flow for weak inertia, tortuosity, and roughness [J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(4): 2064-2080. [Baidu Scholar] 

10

ZHANG G, TIAN Y, LI Y J. Numerical study on the mechanism of fluid flow through single rough fractures with different JRC [J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2019, 49(1): 014701. [Baidu Scholar] 

11

CRANDALL D, BROMHAL G, KARPYN Z T. Numerical simulations examining the relationship between wall-roughness and fluid flow in rock fractures [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(5): 784-796. [Baidu Scholar] 

12

RASOULI V, HOSSEINIAN A. Correlations developed for estimation of hydraulic parameters of rough fractures through the simulation of JRC flow channels [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011, 44(4): 447-461. [Baidu Scholar] 

13

LI B, JIANG Y J. Quantitative estimation of fluid flow mechanism in rock fracture taking into account the influences of JRC and Reynolds number [J]. Journal of the Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan, 2013, 129(7): 479-484. [Baidu Scholar] 

14

DIMADIS G, DIMADI A, BACASIS I. Influence of fracture roughness on aperture fracture surface and in fluid flow on coarse-grained marble, experimental results [J]. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 2014, 2(5): 59-67. [Baidu Scholar] 

15

LUO Y F, XIA B W, LI H L, et al. Fractal permeability model for dual-porosity media embedded with natural tortuous fractures [J]. Fuel, 2021, 295: 120610. [Baidu Scholar] 

16

DING X H, FENG S J, ZHENG Q T, et al. A two-dimensional analytical model for organic contaminants transport in a transition layer-cutoff wall-aquifer system [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 128: 103816. [Baidu Scholar] 

17

TANG D H, FRIND E O, SUDICKY E A. Contaminant transport in fractured porous media: Analytical solution for a single fracture [J]. Water Resources Research, 1981, 17(3): 555-564. [Baidu Scholar] 

18

ZHAO Z H, JING L R, NERETNIEKS I, et al. Analytical solution of coupled stress-flow-transport processes in a single rock fracture [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2011, 37(9): 1437-1449. [Baidu Scholar] 

19

ZHU Y H, ZHAN H B, JIN M G. Analytical solutions of solute transport in a fracture-matrix system with different reaction rates for fracture and matrix [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 539: 447-456. [Baidu Scholar] 

20

OGATA S, YASUHARA H, KINOSHITA N, et al. Modeling of coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical-chemical processes for predicting the evolution in permeability and reactive transport behavior within single rock fractures [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2018, 107: 271-281. [Baidu Scholar] 

21

TSANG Y W, TSANG C F, HALE F V, et al. Tracer transport in a stochastic continuum model of fractured media [J]. Water Resources Research, 1996, 32(10): 3077-3092. [Baidu Scholar] 

22

SURESH KUMAR G. Mathematical modeling of groundwater flow and solute transport in saturated fractured rock using a dual-porosity approach [J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2014, 19(12): 04014033. [Baidu Scholar] 

23

YAN B C, ALFI M, AN C, et al. General Multi-Porosity simulation for fractured reservoir modeling [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 33: 777-791. [Baidu Scholar] 

24

LAGENDIJK V R, VOGEL T, KÖNGETER J. Contaminant transport modeling in multi-porosity fractured systems using a multi-continuum approach[M]//Geoecology and Computers. London; New York : Routledge, 2018: 497-502. [Baidu Scholar] 

25

MA G W, WANG Y, LI T, et al. A mesh mapping method for simulating stress-dependent permeability of three-dimensional discrete fracture networks in rocks [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 108: 95-106. [Baidu Scholar] 

26

HADGU T, KARRA S, KALININA E, et al. A comparative study of discrete fracture network and equivalent continuum models for simulating flow and transport in the far field of a hypothetical nuclear waste repository in crystalline host rock [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 553: 59-70. [Baidu Scholar] 

27

BLESSENT D, THERRIEN R, MACQUARRIE K. Coupling geological and numerical models to simulate groundwater flow and contaminant transport in fractured media [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2009, 35(9): 1897-1906. [Baidu Scholar] 

28

HYMAN J D, KARRA S, MAKEDONSKA N, et al. dfnWorks: A discrete fracture network framework for modeling subsurface flow and transport [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2015, 84: 10-19. [Baidu Scholar] 

29

SHERMAN T, HYMAN J D, BOLSTER D, et al. Characterizing the impact of particle behavior at fracture intersections in three-dimensional discrete fracture networks [J]. Physical Review E, 2019, 99(1): 013110. [Baidu Scholar] 

30

LI X X, LI D Q, XU Y, et al. A DFN based 3D numerical approach for modeling coupled groundwater flow and solute transport in fractured rock mass [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 149: 119179. [Baidu Scholar] 

31

CHEN Y, MA G W, LI T, et al. Simulation of wormhole propagation in fractured carbonate rocks with unified pipe-network method [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 98: 58-68. [Baidu Scholar] 

32

MA G W, LI T, WANG Y, et al. Numerical simulations of nuclide migration in highly fractured rock masses by the unified pipe-network method [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 111: 261-276. [Baidu Scholar] 

33

CHUGUNOV V, FOMIN S. Effect of adsorption, radioactive decay and fractal structure of matrix on solute transport in fracture [J]. Philosophical Transactions Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 2020, 378(2172): 20190283. [Baidu Scholar] 

34

FREEZE R A, CHERRY J A. Groundwater [M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1979. [Baidu Scholar] 

35

LIESER K H. Nuclear and radiochemistry: Fundamentals and applications [M]. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [Baidu Scholar] 

36

MYERS N O. Characterization of surface roughness [J]. Wear, 1962, 5(3): 182-189. [Baidu Scholar] 

37

TSE R, CRUDEN D M. Estimating joint roughness coefficients [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1979, 16(5): 303-307. [Baidu Scholar] 

38

XIONG X B, LI B, JIANG Y J, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(8): 1292-1302. [Baidu Scholar] 

39

OLSON J E. Sublinear scaling of fracture aperture versus length: An exception or the rule? [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2003, 108(B9): 2413. [Baidu Scholar] 

40

ZHAO Z H, LI B, JIANG Y J. Effects of fracture surface roughness on macroscopic fluid flow and solute transport in fracture networks [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(6): 2279-2286. [Baidu Scholar] 

41

BABADAGLI T, DEVELI K. Fractal characteristics of rocks fractured under tension [J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2003, 39(1): 73-88. [Baidu Scholar] 

42

SCHWARZ J O, ENZMANN F. Simulation of fluid flow on fractures and implications for reactive transport simulations [J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2013, 96(3): 501-525. [Baidu Scholar] 

43

HIBIYA K, INABA T, SHIOGAMA Y, et al. A study on groundwater flow in Japan: JNC TN7400 99-004 [R]. Tokai, Japan: Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Insitute (JNC), 1999. [Baidu Scholar] 

44

GALETTI D, MIZRAHI S S. The delimiting/frontier lines of the constituents of matter [J]. arXiv2019: 1909.07223. [Baidu Scholar]