几种土建合同条件下争议处理方式的分析与讨论
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU723.1

基金项目:


Analysis and Discussion on Settlement of Disputes under Some Civil Engineering Contract Conditions
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对监理工程师实际工作中争议处理能力不足的问题展开讨论,分别分析了新版FIDIC合同条件及国内两种主要土建合同条件下争议处理方式的异同,指出了新版FIDIC合同中DAB和《水利水电土建施工合同》中争议调解组的科学性和必要性。

    Abstract:

    Firstly the incapability of supervising engineers in dealing with disputes is discussed. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between the methods of disputes settlement under the provisions of the new edition of FIDIC Conditions and the two main domestic civil engineering contract conditions.It is argued that the DAB proposed by the new edition of FIDIC Conditions and the dispute mediator suggested by the Irrigation Works, Water and Electrical Works and Civil Engineering Construction Contract are reasonable and necessary.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

丁大勇.几种土建合同条件下争议处理方式的分析与讨论[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2002,24(1):55-58. DING Da yong. Analysis and Discussion on Settlement of Disputes under Some Civil Engineering Contract Conditions[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2002,24(1):55-58.10.11835/j. issn.1674-4764.2002.01.012

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2001-05-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: