古建筑木结构偷心造和计心造斗力学性能数值分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU366.2

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51208427);中国工程院咨询研究项目(2010-ZD-4)


Numerical analysis of mechanical behavior of Tou-xin-zao and Ji-xin-zao tou-kung in Chinese ancient timber structures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    古建筑木结构的斗栱做法有偷心造和计心造两种基本形式,为研究这两种斗栱力学性能的差异,以饶益寺大佛殿的偷心造与计心造斗栱为研究对象,建立偷心造与计心造斗栱的有限元模型,用某斗栱的试验数据验证了有限元模型的正确性,并分析这两种斗栱在竖向荷载和水平低周反复荷载作用下的力学性能。研究结果表明:在竖向荷载作用下,由于计心造斗栱的横栱比偷心造斗栱多,其竖向荷载位移曲线有一个明显的强化阶段,导致其极限承载力比偷心造斗栱大29.9%;在水平低周反复荷载作用下,两种斗栱的滞回曲线都比较饱满,均表现出较好的耗能能力,但二者相差不大。

    Abstract:

    Tou-xin-zao and ji-xin-zao are the two basic forms of tou-kung in Chinese ancient timber structures. To study the mechanical performance of the two types of tou-kung, finite element models are established for the typical tou-xin-zao and ji-xin-zao tou-kung in Raoyi Temple. The models are verified with previous experimental results and then subjected to vertical loading and horizontal low frequency cyclic loading, respectively. The finite element analysis shows that under vertical loading, the ji-xin-zao tou-kung experiences a strength hardening stage, with the ultimate bearing capacity 29.9% higher than that of tou-xin-zao tou-kung. It was found that the additional structural members (heng-gong) in ji-xin-zao tou-kung contributed to the higher bearing capacity. Under horizontal cyclic loading, the two tou-kung types behave equally well in terms of energy dissipation performance and both exhibite relatively plump hysteresis loops.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

潘毅,袁双,王慧琴,王晓玥,林拥军.古建筑木结构偷心造和计心造斗力学性能数值分析[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2017,39(5):9-15. Pan Yi, Yuan Shuang, Wang Huiqin, Wang Xiaoyue, Lin Yongjun. Numerical analysis of mechanical behavior of Tou-xin-zao and Ji-xin-zao tou-kung in Chinese ancient timber structures[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2017,39(5):9-15.10.11835/j. issn.1674-4764.2017.05.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-26
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-10-11
  • 出版日期: