MICP加固砂土方法对比研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.重庆市地质灾害防治中心,重庆 400015;2.重庆大学,土木工程学院;3.重庆大学,山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室;4.重庆铁路投资集团有限公司,重庆 400023

作者简介:

张锦程(1986- ),男,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害防治研究,E-mail:88659503@qq.com。

通讯作者:

吴焕然(通信作者),男,博士,E-mail:hwucqu@163.com。

中图分类号:

TU441

基金项目:

重庆市规划和自然资源局科研项目(KJ-2021048);重庆英才计划优秀科学家项目(cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0051);国家自然科学基金(41831282、52108303)


Comparative study on MICP-treatment schemes for sands
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Geohazard Prevention Center of Chongqing, Chongqing 400015, P. R. China;2. School of Civil Engineering;3. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P. R. China;4.Chongqing Railway Investment Group Co. Ltd., Chongqing 400023, P. R. China

Fund Project:

Chongqing Planning and Natural Resources Bureau (No. KJ-2021048); Chongqing Talents Program (No. cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0051); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41831282, 52108303)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀(MICP)技术是新兴的岩土工程绿色加固技术,在散粒土加固方面具有良好的应用前景。MICP加固砂土的均匀性和力学表现是目前存在的重要问题,为优化MICP加固方法,改善加固后砂土的综合表现,开展MICP加固砂土方法对比试验研究。详细介绍了传统两相法、pH法及温控法MICP加固方案,利用传统两相法、pH法及温控法开展砂柱试样的MICP加固试验,从加固试样的碳酸钙分布均匀性、反应液中钙离子利用率及加固试样的无侧限抗压强度等3个方面对比分析3种MICP加固方法的综合表现。结果表明:在试验条件下,传统两相法在3方面均表现最差;pH法和温控法整体表现较好,其中温控法反应液利用率较高,在高加固程度时强度略高,综合表现最优。

    Abstract:

    Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a new green ground improvement technique in geotechnical engineering and has a promising prospect in reinforcing granular soils. The uniformity and the mechanical performance of MICP-treated sands are important issues in the MICP method. To optimize the MICP-treatment scheme and improve the overall performance of MICP-treated sands, a comparative experimental study on different MICP-treatment schemes for sands was carried out. Firstly, the MICP-treatment schemes, including the conventional two-phase method, the pH method and the temperature-controlled method, were introduced in detail. Then, a series of MICP-treatment experiments on sand columns were conducted, following the three different schemes, respectively. Finally, the three different schemes were compared in terms of the distribution of CaCO3 in the post-treatment specimens, the utilization rate of reaction solutions and the unconfined compressive strength of the post-treatment specimens. Under the testing conditions in this paper, the conventional two-phase method has the worst performance in the three aspects; the pH method and the temperature-controlled method generally perform well; in comparison with the pH method, the temperature-controlled method has a higher utilization rate of reaction solutions and a higher strength under high-treatment conditions; the temperature-controlled method has the best overall performance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张锦程,李俊,肖鹏,刘汉龙,吴焕然.MICP加固砂土方法对比研究[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2023,45(6):151-157. ZHANG Jingcheng, LI Jun, XIAO Peng, LIU Hanlong, WU Huanran. Comparative study on MICP-treatment schemes for sands[J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING,2023,45(6):151-157.10.11835/j. issn.2096-6717.2022.125

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-23
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-13
  • 出版日期: