A Comparison of Four Methods of Water Quality Assessment
DOI:
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

X824

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In this paper, a back propagation network, a Hopfield network, Fuzzy comprehensive index method and classification of gray are compared in application for water quality assessment. The comparison result shows that the BP network is the best one of these four methods.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

郭劲松 龙腾锐.四种水质综合评价方法的比较[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2000,22(4):6~12

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online:
  • Published:
Article QR Code