Comparative study on MICP-treatment schemes for sands
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Geohazard Prevention Center of Chongqing, Chongqing 400015, P. R. China;2. School of Civil Engineering;3. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P. R. China;4.Chongqing Railway Investment Group Co. Ltd., Chongqing 400023, P. R. China

Clc Number:

TU441

Fund Project:

Chongqing Planning and Natural Resources Bureau (No. KJ-2021048); Chongqing Talents Program (No. cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0051); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41831282, 52108303)

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a new green ground improvement technique in geotechnical engineering and has a promising prospect in reinforcing granular soils. The uniformity and the mechanical performance of MICP-treated sands are important issues in the MICP method. To optimize the MICP-treatment scheme and improve the overall performance of MICP-treated sands, a comparative experimental study on different MICP-treatment schemes for sands was carried out. Firstly, the MICP-treatment schemes, including the conventional two-phase method, the pH method and the temperature-controlled method, were introduced in detail. Then, a series of MICP-treatment experiments on sand columns were conducted, following the three different schemes, respectively. Finally, the three different schemes were compared in terms of the distribution of CaCO3 in the post-treatment specimens, the utilization rate of reaction solutions and the unconfined compressive strength of the post-treatment specimens. Under the testing conditions in this paper, the conventional two-phase method has the worst performance in the three aspects; the pH method and the temperature-controlled method generally perform well; in comparison with the pH method, the temperature-controlled method has a higher utilization rate of reaction solutions and a higher strength under high-treatment conditions; the temperature-controlled method has the best overall performance.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

张锦程,李俊,肖鹏,刘汉龙,吴焕然.MICP加固砂土方法对比研究[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2023,45(6):151~157

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:August 23,2022
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 13,2023
  • Published:
Article QR Code