+Advanced Search
Home > Archive>Volume 42, Issue 6, 2019 >55-68. DOI:10.11835/j.issn.1000-582X.2019.06.007
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Effects of cross-seam borehole layout on gas extraction in the Pansan mine
CSTR:
[cstr]
Author:
Clc Number:

TD712

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [20]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The layout of cross-layer boreholes is one of the important factors affecting the efficiency of gas extraction. In order to study the effects of the layouts of cross-seam boreholes on gas extraction, gas control roadway 2121(1) in the Pansan mine was taken as the research object in this paper to analyze the effects of the three kinds of layouts of cross-seam boreholes, 10×5, 8×6 and 7×7, on gas extraction. The gas-solid coupling model of coal seam based on fracture-pore dual media was established, and the gas extraction processes of the three kinds of borehole layouts were simulated numerically by using finite volume method and Newton iteration method. And the engineer quantity of boreholes and the average pure gas flow volume extracted in the 30 days were investigated at the field. The results show that the "blank zone" area of the borehole layout 8×6 and that of 7×7 are smaller obviously than that of 10×5 under the same time of gas extraction. And the extraction time required for the elimination of "blank zone" is less than that of the borehole layout of 10×5. So, the borehole layout of 10×5 is bad for eliminating gas outburst. The engineer quantity of the borehole layout of 8×6 is the smallest and that of the borehole layout of 7×7 is the largest. The average pure flow volume daily by single borehole of the borehole layout of 7×7 is larger slightly than that of the borehole layout of 8×6, and that of the borehole layout of 10×5 is the smallest. The results of the numerical simulation and the field experiments considered, it is obtained that the borehole layout of 8×6 is the optimal. The result of this study provides a good guidance for the design of cross-seam boreholes in a coal mine.

    Reference
    [1] 周福宝,王鑫鑫,夏同强,等.瓦斯安全抽采及其建模[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(8):1659-1666.ZHOU Fubao, WANG Xinxin, XIA Tongqiang, et al. A model of safe drainage of coal seam gas[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(8):1659-1666. (in Chinese)
    [2] Karacan C Ö, Diamond W P, Schatzel S J. Numerical analysis of the influence of in-seam horizontal methane drainage boreholes on longwall face emission rates[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2007, 72(1):15-32.
    [3] Wu B, Hua M, Feng X Y, et al. Study on methods of determining gas extraction radius with numerical simulation[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 45:345-351.
    [4] Zhang C, Xu J, Peng S, et al. Dynamic behavior of gas pressure and optimization of borehole length in stress relaxation zone during coalbed methane production[J]. Fuel, 2018, 233:816-824.
    [5] 卢平, 李平, 周德永, 等. 石门揭煤防突抽放瓦斯钻孔合理布置参数的研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2002, 27(3):242-248.LU Ping, LI Ping, ZHOU Deyong, et al. Study on proper layout parameters of the gas drainage drills of outburst prevention in rock cross-cut coal uncovering[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2002, 27(3):242-248. (in Chinese)
    [6] 王旭锋, 张东升, 李国君, 等. 铁法矿区高瓦斯低透气性煤层群卸压煤层气抽采钻孔布置[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(8):1296-1301.WANG Xufeng, ZHANG Dongsheng, LI Guojun, et al. Boreholes layout of coal mine methane drainage for high gassy and low permeability coal seams in Tiefa coalfield[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(8):1296-1301. (in Chinese)
    [7] 秦伟, 许家林, 吴仁伦, 等. 基于CFD模拟的邻近层穿层钻孔瓦斯抽采优化设计[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2012, 29(1):111-117.QIN Wei, XU Jialin, WU Renlun, et al. Gas extraction optimum design of layer-through borehole in adjacent seam based on CFD simulation[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2012, 29(1):111-117. (in Chinese)
    [8] 刘军, 王兆丰, 李学臣, 等. 消除矿井瓦斯抽采空白带方法的研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2012, 40(12):59-61,87.LIU Jun, WANG Zhaofeng, LI Xuechen, et al. Study on the methods of eliminating blank zone of mine gas drainage[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2012, 40(12):59-61,87. (in Chinese)
    [9] 徐青伟, 王兆丰. 预抽煤层瓦斯消除空白带钻孔布置方式的优化[J]. 煤矿安全, 2015, 46(8):152-155.XU Qingwei, WANG Zhaofeng. Optimization of borehole layout to eliminate drainage blind by pre-pumping coal seam gas[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(8):152-155. (in Chinese)
    [10] 李胜, 毕慧杰, 范超军, 等. 基于流固耦合模型的穿层钻孔瓦斯抽采模拟研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(5):121-127.LI Sheng, BI Huijie, FAN Chaojun, et al. Simulation study of gas drainage with borehole passed through strata based on fluid-solid coupling[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2017, 45(5):121-127. (in Chinese)
    [11] Liu Z D, Cheng Y P, Jiang J Y, et al. Interactions between coal seam gas drainage boreholes and the impact of such on borehole patterns[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 38:597-607.
    [12] 吴世跃. 煤层中的耦合运动理论及其应用:具有吸附作用的气固耦合运动理论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2009.WU Shiyue. Theory and application of coupling behavior in coal-gas-solid coupling motion theory of adsorption[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
    [13] Kong X, Wang E, Liu Q, et al. Dynamic permeability and porosity evolution of coal seam rich in CBM based on the flow-solid coupling theory[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 40:61-71.
    [14] 司鹄, 郭涛, 李晓红. 钻孔抽放瓦斯流固耦合分析及数值模拟[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2011, 34(11):105-110.SI Hu, GUO Tao, LI Xiaohong. Analysis and numerical simulation of fluid-structure coupling of gas drainage from boreholes[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2011, 34(11):105-110. (in Chinese)
    [15] Wang J G, Liu J, Kabir A. Combined effects of directional compaction, non-Darcy flow and anisotropic swelling on coal seam gas extraction[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 109/110:1-14.
    [16] 王登科, 彭明, 付启超, 等. 瓦斯抽采过程中的煤层透气性动态演化规律与数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(4):704-712.WANG Dengke, PENG Ming, FU Qichao, et al. Evolution and numerical simulation of coal permeability during gas drainage in coal seams[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(4):704-712. (in Chinese)
    [17] Saad Y, Schultz M H. GMRES:a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 1986, 7(3):856-869.
    [18] 唐明云, 施安峰, 王晓宏, 等. 含轻质组分稠油油藏蒸汽注采过程自适应网格法[J]. 力学季刊, 2013, 34(1):25-31.TANG Mingyun, SHI Anfeng, WANG Xiaohong, et al. Adaptive mesh refinement method for thermal recovery of heavy oil with light component using steam injection[J]. Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics, 2013, 34(1):25-31. (in Chinese)
    [19] Laguna A A, Ozak N, Lani A, et al. Fully-implicit finite volume method for the ideal two-fluid plasma model[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2018, 231:31-44.
    [20] 辛明. 利用SF6示踪技术测试煤层瓦斯抽采半径[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 32(1):64-66.XIN Ming. Determination of gas extraction radius in coal seams by tracer technique with SF6[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2012, 32(1):64-66. (in Chinese)
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

唐明云,秦汝祥,戴广龙,胡祖祥,周亮,杨应迪.潘三煤矿11-2煤穿层钻孔的优化布置[J].重庆大学学报,2019,42(6):55~68

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:689
  • PDF: 862
  • HTML: 523
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:March 01,2019
  • Online: June 20,2019
Article QR Code
You are the1698960 visitor
ParentUnit：Ministry of Education
Unit：ChongQing University
Address：重庆市沙坪坝正街174号
Fax： ServiceTel：023-65102302
® 2025 All Rights Reserved