Analysis of evaluation standards of labor education practice based on Nvivo12 Plus
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

G40-015

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [17]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Labor education is an important part of fostering human all-round development. The evaluation standard of labor education practice base plays an important guiding role in the construction of labor education base. This paper uses Nvivo12 Plus to encode and classify the evaluation standards of labor education practice bases in 7 provinces and finds that the evaluation standard systems have some common advantages such as emphasizing safe operation as the focus of labor education practice base construction, complete facilities as the center of labor education practice base construction, and educating people as the core of labor education practice base construction. However, there are also some problems such as ignoring the evaluation of teaching feedback, the content is too general and not comprehensive, ignoring the evaluation of the base teachers, and the convergence of indicators in various provinces which lacks directivity. Therefore, in order to better play the leading role of the evaluation standard system, the teaching feedback of the education base should be included in the evaluation standard system, the composition of the teaching force should be clearly listed as the evaluation index, the educational content of emerging labor form should be increased, and the characteristics of various places should be highlighted in the evaluation standard, so that the evaluation standard system of the labor education practice base can better serve the needs of the development of labor education.

    Reference
    [1] 徐长发. 新时代劳动教育再发展的逻辑[J]. 教育研究, 2018, 39(11): 12-17.
    [2] 教育部关于印发义务教育课程方案和课程标准(2022年版)的通知[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版集团, 2022: 58.
    [3] 伍多·库卡茨, 著. 质性文本分析: 方法、实践与软件使用指南[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2017: 36-59.
    [4] 刘世闵, 李志伟. 质性研究必备工具: NVivo之图解与应用[M]. 北京: 经济日报出版社, 2017: 4.
    [5] 任国友. 劳动教育风险类型与安全保障机制的构建[J]. 人民教育, 2020(8): 27-29.
    [6] 位涛, 刘铁芳. 劳动意涵的历史演变与劳动教育的当代实践[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2022(3): 77-86, 95.
    [7] 许瑞芳, 张宜萱. 具身认知视角下的劳动教育审视: 基础、价值与路径[J]. 教育发展研究, 2021, 41(22): 54-61.
    [8] 中共中央国务院关于全面加强新时代大中小学劳动教育的意见[M]北京: 人民出版社, 2020: 8-9.
    [9] 康翠萍, 龚洪. 新时代中小学劳动教育课程的价值旨归[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2019, 191(6): 69-74.
    [10] 任平. 德国劳动教师教育课程体系构成、特征及其启示——以柏林工业大学为例[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2020(5): 91-99.
    [11] 田立君. 学习评价的理论与应用[M]. 长春: 东北师范大学出版社, 2015: 151.
    [12] 付红军. 劳动教育新样态的区域探索[J]. 人民教育, 2021(22): 56-58.
    [13] 苏日娜, 王连喜. 不断提高劳动教育的系统性、科学性、时代性[J]. 人民教育, 2021(Z2): 85-86.
    [14] 习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2017: 31.
    [15] 檀传宝. 劳动教育的概念理解——如何认识劳动教育概念的基本内涵与基本特征[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2019(2): 82-84.
    [16] 田友谊, 韩雪童. 信息化时代创造性劳动的发生机制及其课程实践[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 60(6): 164-173.
    [17] 牛瑞雪. 中小学如何构建劳动教育特色课程体系——落实《关于全面加强新时代大中小学劳动教育的意见》的实践策略[J]. 课程. 教材. 教法, 2020, 40(5): 11-15.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

吕进,易双.基于Nvivo12 Plus的劳动教育实践基地评定标准分析[J].高等建筑教育,2022,31(5):206~215

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:292
  • PDF: 576
  • HTML: 598
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Revised:August 30,2022
  • Online: November 01,2022
Article QR Code