Construction of Strategy for Civil Engineering Based on Accreditation Engineering Education
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Hainan University;2.College of Engineering,State University of New York Polytechnic Institute,Utica ,USA

Clc Number:

G642.0

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [16]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Due to the accreditation of Civil Engineering in Hainan University, the educational objectives, graduation requirements, practical curriculum, teaching pedagogy and some other aspects are deeply researched and practiced based on the core ideology of Accreditation Engineering Education. Meanwhile, the similarities and differences in program setup and objectives of Civil Engineering for undergraduate education are compared and analyzed between State University of New York Polytechnic Institute (SUNY Poly) and Hainan University. The merits of the SUNY Poly program are reflected and noted for potential beneficial aspects one can adopt in the future. The ultimate goal of strategy for Civil Engineering is to cultivate talent Civil Engineering graduates with distinctive regional characteristics and meets the thriving market demand of Hainan province.

    Reference
    [1] 毕家驹. 中国工程专业认证进入稳步发展阶段[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2009, 25(1): 1-5,120.
    [2] 李国强, 熊海贝. 土木工程专业教育评估国际互认的探索与实践[J]. 高等建筑教育, 2013,22(1):5-12.
    [3] 王瑞朋, 王孙禺, 李锋亮.论美国工程教育专业认证制度与工程师注册制度的衔接[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2015,36(1): 34-40.
    [4] 徐晓飞, 沈毅, 钟诗胜, 等. 新工科模式与创新人才培养探索与实践[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2020(2): 19-26.
    [5] 江学良, 胡习兵, 陈伯望, 等. 专业认证背景下土木工程专业人才培养体系探索与实践. 高等建筑教育[J], 2015, 24(1): 29-35.
    [6] 徐锋, 范剑, 许晨光. 新工科背景下地方高校材料力学金课建设路径与探索[J]. 力学与实践, 2020, 42(2): 226-231.
    [7] 袁焕鑫, 杜新喜, 郭耀杰. 约翰.霍普金斯大学土木工程专业课程设置与教学分析[J]. 高等建筑教育,2020, 29(1) :102-109.
    [8] 罗丹, 李峻. 中美创新人才培养衔接比较研究——以四所大学土木工程专业为例[J]. 高校教育管理, 2015, 9(6): 35-40.
    [9] 叶志明, 汪德江, 赵慧玲. 课程、教书、育人——理工类学科与专业类课程思政之建设与实践. 力学与实践[J], 2020, 42(2): 214-218.
    [10] Spady WG, Marshall MJ. Beyond traditional outcome-based education. Educational Leadership[J], 1991(2): 65-74.
    [11] 王孙禺, 赵自强, 雷环. 中国工程教育认证制度的构建与完善——国际实质等效的认证制度建设十年回望[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2014,(5): 23-34.
    [12] https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/E001-20-21-EAC-Criteria-Mark-Up-11-24-19-Updated.pdf.
    [13] 余天佐, 刘少雪, 杨聚鹏. 如何迎接专业认证——对美国伍斯特理工学院认证历程的考察. 高等工程教育研究[J], 2015(2): 121-127.
    [14] 章建石. 课程评估:澳、英高校教学质量保障的新动向[J]. 中国高等教育, 2007(22): 62-63.
    [15] 祝怀新, 毛红霞. 南非“以结果为本的教育”课程模式探析[J]. 外国教育研究, 2006, 33(4): 34-38.
    [16] 韩雁, 冯兴杰, 梁志星. 基于学生学习成果的国际工程教育专业认证[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2014,(4): 77-83,119.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:514
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:November 18,2020
  • Revised:December 26,2020
  • Adopted:February 25,2021
Article QR Code