Research on the cultivation path of innovative thinking of architecture major from the perspective of high level research university:A comparison and reference of Chinese and Korean universities
CSTR:
Affiliation:

Soochow University

Clc Number:

G40

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [18]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The innovative thinking training system of Architecture Specialty in high-level research university is the education system to construct the basic teaching training. Combined with the characteristics of the current preliminary education stage of architecture major, this paper expounds several basic principles of architectural basic teaching, and emphasizes the importance of cultivating the spatial creative thinking ability of architectural students. We should combine the training of first-class architectural talents in high-level research universities with social needs, and fully understand the social employment standards. We should strengthen the cultivation of students" innovative ability and practical ability, and cultivate high-quality architectural innovative professionals with professional quality, self-improvement ability and lifelong learning ability to meet the social needs. This study focuses on the comparison and reference of Chinese and Korean universities, and constructs the method and path of "innovative thinking training system of Architecture Specialty in high-level research university".

    Reference
    [1] H. M. Lee. The Strategy of Learning-based HRD for Making Strong Organization [J]. Seoul, Korea: Central Economy,2013.
    [2] 赵立恒. 建筑设计基础课程教学改革的探索与实践研究[J]. 黑龙江科学,2019,10(17): 56-57.
    [3] Youngse Kim. Basic Designers Qualities Education in Creative Engineering Design Course [J]. The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006(6): 3209-3213.
    [4] Youngmi Kim. The Development of Competency-Based Extracurricular and its Operating System for developing creative-convergent talent [J]. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 2016, 20(10): 1987-1993.
    [5] 冯华. 建筑设计基础课程体验式教学研究[J]. 装饰,2018(11): 132-133.
    [6] 李翔,钟浩. 面向设计创新教育变革的设计思维与方法课程混合式教学实践探索[J]. 设计艺术研究,2019,9(5): 37-43.
    [7] 丁鼎,薛小杰,陈静. 校园“微建筑”设计启蒙—设计基础体验式教学与实践研究[J]. 建筑与文化,2020(3): 174-176.
    [8] 常工,王珉,蒙小英. 跨学科建筑设计基础课程教学模式研究[J]. 高等建筑教育,2011,20(1): 70-74.
    [9] 郑建启,黄雪飞,汤军,李翔. 论工业设计教育之再设计[J]. 设计艺术研究,2017,7(3): 1-6.
    [10] 伍立峰. 教学设计创新与设计思维能力的培养[J]. 装饰,2007(1): 47-48.
    [11] 王琼,张宁,金诗曼. 知行合一(中):设计色彩-苏州大学建筑学院基础教学平台造型基础课程探索与实践[J]. 室内设计与装修,2019(8): 130-133.
    [12] 荀振芳,李双辰. “双一流”建设背景下高水平行业特色型大学的资源配置与发展[J]. 高等教育研究,2019,40(5): 40-48.
    [13] 卢曼萍. “双一流”背景下地方高水平大学“一流本科”建设探析[J]. 高教学刊,2019(25): 6-9.
    [14] Choi Donghyeog. A Study on the Architectural Design Education as a Basic Design Education in Terms of Creative Thinking Training - Focused on the Formative Procedure in the Basic Architectural Design Studio [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL INSTITUTE OF KOREA Planning Design, 2012, 28(9): 123-130.
    [15] ???. 20?? ??? ??? ????? ??? ?? ??[J]. ??????, 1998, 18(2): 331.
    [16] Edward de Bono. The Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) Thinking Program [J]. Thinking Development Research, 1991, 1(2): 105-117.
    [17] ???. ????? ?????? ??????? ?? ??[J]. ?????????, 211, 27(10): 213.
    [18] ???. ??? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ?? ??1 ?? ??????? ????? ????[J]. ?????????, 212, 28(9): 123-130.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:132
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:December 16,2020
  • Revised:January 12,2021
  • Adopted:March 24,2021
Article QR Code