环境侵权因果关系判断标准的理论歧向与体系建构
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The Innovation Research on Validation of Causation in Environmental Tort
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    由于环境侵权的特殊性,致使环境侵权因果关系的认定困难重重,运用盖然性、疫学、经验法则理论来推定因果关系,有利于保护受害人,实现法的正义价值。但是,这些学说仍然存在适用范围较窄、对法官素质要求较高以及需要判例支持等问题。中国应确定以正义、秩序和效率为主要价值目标,以相当因果关系为基础,以因果关系推定为原则,遵循较低的盖然性证明标准,构建“一横一纵”式包含各种标准和方法的环境侵权因果关系判断标准体系。

    Abstract:

    Owing to the particularity of environmental tort, it is very difficult to deduce the causation of environmental tort. So the use of probability, epidemiology and empirical rules in validation of causation is benefit for the protection of victims and realizing the value of justice of the law. But all of these theories have their defects, such as these theories’s applicable scope is quite narrow, the high requirement of judges, needs the legal precedent to support and so on. We should build “a horizontal and a vertical” type which contains a variety of standards and methods of the rule of validation system of causation about environment tort. In this system, we should make the justice, order and efficiency as the main value of the pursuit for the rule of validation, take the correspondious causality as the foundation, take the causality presumption as the basic principle, and follows the lower probability standard of proof.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宋宗宇.环境侵权因果关系判断标准的理论歧向与体系建构[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2009,15(1):91-95.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: